An interesting interview of a great testpilot and aviator. I recently read “Wings on my Sleeve” as well as “Wings of the Luftwaffe” and was immediately impressed by Captain Brown´s skill as an author but even more so as an extraordinary pilot with excellent and literally unique experience. He surely is one of a kind.
Michael
This single seater is coded DV + C-P, could these be the initials of a double barrelled officer? It is my favourite shot in the collection!
@SMS88: Thanks for posting those unique pictures. I can fully understand why this one is your favourite shot. Really great. What would that flightline of Fw 190´s be worth today? Shame only so few of this type survived…..
Michael
I flew to Stansted on Friday morning, going to the hotel at Cambridge by train. I was in Duxford by around 11 a.m., I think Friday was the perfect day, much sun, few people, very good training flights and quite few people in the hangars. Very good performance by Patrouille de France and Red Arrows as well, very good Hurricane formation and display. Stunning were the 16 Spitfires, very impressing. I liked the Sea Fury and Bearcat, you could hear all those horses under the cowling running…. Nice display of the 2 Bückers as well, especially liked the Jungmann, the silver one. Astonishing tight turns and display in a quite narrow space, just turning on it´s heels… It was all in all the very best airshow I have ever seen. Thanks to everybody involved, who made this show possible, especially organisers and pilots. Very well done, I enjoyed every minute.
Michael
[QUOTE=Mark12;1600691]……
Connie has written Me109G Ser. No. 220 on the reverse. ……..
Hello Mark,
have a look here: http://www.messerschmitt-bf109.de/
Overview > Current list of the spanish license build Bf 109 > Factory number 220 (Marking: Winkel Dreieck, Service no. C.4K-152)
Loosely translated the “Curriculum Vitae” says:
“After end of service with Spanish Air Force this airplane flew in the BoB film with registration No. G-AWHR from 14.05.1968 on, shall have flown with markings “White 5″. Afterwards it was shipped to the US, owner Mr. Wilson Edwards. Registered as N4109G on 09.04.1969 in the experimental category. Nowadays stored in a hangar, not in airworthy condition.”
Text with additional infos (pics) says:
“Pics taken in the early 70 ies at Sheppard AFB, Texas”
It seems to be with ´Connie´ Edwards still.
I hope the information is correct, I do not know anything else.
Michael
Very nice, as Bruce says they are reasonably common, would love to see one running however and would like to restore one myself so if your looking to offload it 😉
There is a possibility Hafner has a manual for it if you have a search (it may be contained within the 262 manual), sorry if he doesnt!
http://www.luftfahrt-archiv-hafner.de/
All the best
Matt
@Tom: Matt is right, Hafner has a manual for the “Riedel-Anlasser” (Riedel-starter) it´s called: Riedel-Anlasser Technische Unterlagen, for 19 €, you will find it listed under Junkers Motorenwerke JUMO, scroll down to JUMO 004, second last item above Junkers Verstelluftschrauben VLS (variable pitch propellers).
Michael
Shows what a superb landing he pulled off…
Question – I think the Ash engines are transport engines, and designed for essentially long periods at the same settings, in company with three others doing the same thing.
How do they react when transferred into a fighter aircraft, and being asked to deliver their power in a very different way, at constantly changing throttle settings?
I dont know the answer here – just interested!
Bruce
Hi Bruce, there were Russian fighters with ASh 82 engines as well, for example the Lavochkin La 5,
http://www.world-war-2-planes.com/Lavochkin-La-5.html
La 7,
http://www.world-war-2-planes.com/lavochkin-la-7-russian-aircraft.html
La 9
http://www.kiwiaircraftimages.com/la9.html
They do refer to the engine either as Shvetsov M-82 or ASh 82, the A being Shvetsov´s first name abbrevation.
Michael
Flugwerk provided the fuselage / wings for the restoration of the 190/A-8, so is the D-9 following the same path ?
this would be the third / fourth D-9 built by Flug-Werk
As far as I know Flugwerk at least provided large parts for this rebuild. I don´t know if they counted it as one of the D-9`s in their production log, or only as parts. There are 3 Doras I know of:
Tom Blair´s at Kissimmee,
Eric Vormezeele´s at Brasschaat,
and 1 with Flugwerk at Gammelsdof, as they want to keep one Dora for themselves, they intend to operate it as well.
The one with German Luftwaffe is not intended to fly, just static example. Luftwaffe does not operate any historic planes, neither itself, nor through a club or company. It´s a shame, but I believe they fear problems regarding history might occur.
Michael
Sad news but at least the pilot is OK – this was one of the highlights of FL2009 for me – hope it can be recovered and returned to flight soon….
“The pilot, French of about sixty years, is unscathed.” – Marc ‘Leon’ Mathis?
Yes Bob, have a look, it´s him.
Michael
Thats two damaged now is there a connection??
It´s bad news the plane is ditched, but the priority is the pilot is safe.
@Peter: Don´t think so. In another forum a member quoted a french paper, that it is believed to be engine failure during performing a roll. The other accident of the four bladed version happened during a highspeed taxirun.
Michael
Glad to see that the pilot was unhurt and the aircraft appears not to be in too bad a condition. BTW: Does anybody know the registration for this example?
Cheers
Peter D Evans
LEMB Administrator
Yes Peter, N190BR.
Have a look at the second flight of it here:
http://www.youtube.com/user/bobrussellairshows#p/a/u/0/9nZjLQpD2-I
PIC on the 2 first flights is Dave Morss, have a look here:
http://www.davemorss.com/work2.html
Michael
Absolutely corking shots Brian, nice work! Love the Spit/Buchon shots especially, thanks for sharing them.
Excellent shots yet again, Brian. Love the Spitfire/Buchon formation shot in particular.
@AdlerTag;@DazDaMan:
You are both absolutely right, I have nothing to add but stating that I fully agree with you.
Michael
Great pictures as usual. 😀 Caviar for the eyes.
Thanks for posting your “first tries”, lol. Better still than others can do at all.
Can´t wait to see more of your pics.
Michael
….. the 262 was better in just about every way except it’s engines.
The 262’s engines needed to be replaced after just 10 flight hours due to putting the limited amount of quality metal Germany had into tank production, the engines couldn’t withstand their own heat. Not to mention they’d catch fire if they were powered up too quickly. …….
…Germany didn’t have enough materials to build them, which resulted in the ones that were built having engines which needed to be replaced pretty much on a per-flight basis, making the material problem even worse…
Bottom line (as far as I know): They very well did know how to build quality jetengines, but the required raw material to produce the right steel alloys just were not available, at least not as much as needed. They did know their material were “Ersatz”, maybe even crap, but couldn´t do any better. I have read, they used iron fan blades when at the end of war nothing else was available, though I personally doubt it. I think it was just some kind of quite inferior low grade steel.
Good thing it did work out as it did in the long run, or I might not be able to visit Britain for holiday vacation. Otherwise I might have to stay there on duty. :diablo:
Michael
Yes, the weight issue definitely doesn’t mean much – after all, if they were describing a 1000lbs allied bomb in Germany, I’m sure they’d say “approximately 500kg”, which might get re-converted as 1100lbs.
As far as I can imagine, nobody in Germany would refer to an allied bomb as a 1000 lbs bomb. All British or American bombs are referred to as for example 500 kg bomb, or 250 kg bomb, never as 450 + – something kg or 225 + – something kg bomb. Lbs would not be used at all, except maybe when a defusing experts is talking with one of his colleagues.
I am not saying it could not be a German bomb, but the weight differences are simply neglected, so I am quite convinced they would not even say “approximately 500 kg”.
Michael
P.S.: “Zehn Zentner Bombe” as mentioned in the video clip means 500 kg bomb, one “Zentner” being an (old) weight unit mainly used in agriculture related context, (like grain or potatoes) for 50 kg. Using the “Zentner” sounds very old fashioned to me, but might still be used in agricultue and farming, I simply do not know.
I’m sure the ARCo boys did their homework on the Buchon’s paintscheme…. 😉
However, if you think about it, the Buchons in the film started off nice and clean. A few months of hard film work would certainly put paid to that! 😉
Thanks, of course you are right about that. I never even thought about it…. 😮
Michael