dark light

redvanner

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 338 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Any Nord 1001 or 1002 projects available #904420
    redvanner
    Participant

    Chippie51: Did you see / know of this one at Platinum? Seems to be a perfect project as they come.

    Michael

    http://www.platinumfighters.com/#!me-108/p2emq

    in reply to: CR.42 Restoration #849149
    redvanner
    Participant

    Beau, Many thanks for the detailed data. I have always had an affinity for this type due to its ops against Oz pilots in North Africa. Such an amazing machine. I think it was Winkle Brown who described it as, “… remarkably fast, brilliantly manoeuvrable, an aerobatic gem but under gunned…” That quote has always stuck in my mind and those to whom I have spoken here who had them as adversaries had a very great respect for them. I look forward to more news in future and hope that your search for parts is fruitful.

    I read a book some 3 – 5 decades ago regarding the airwar in Africa. I do not remember the title nor who was cited. But -if I remember correctly- a former German ace from that theater said: “The Italian biplane pilots (CR-32 and CR-42) were more famous for their aerobatic than for their gunnery skills.” Maybe it just seemed to be like this, due to few guns per plane.

    Michael

    in reply to: What does "Schrage Musik" really mean? #849948
    redvanner
    Participant

    I thought that it was meant to mean

    Side to side

    IE when the Me110s came up under lets say a bomber who was making gentle side to side movements along the track so as not to be in a straight flight path the Me110 night fighter would mimic the side to side motion and once he had or flow and ebb and once he had got the flow and ebb let go with his upward facing gun.
    As massive blind spot on a lot of RAF bombers.

    TA: No, nothing to do with it. K5054NZ has got it right, though my explanation might give an even better background.

    Michael

    in reply to: What does "Schrage Musik" really mean? #850051
    redvanner
    Participant

    “Schräge Musik” in context with jazz might come from the derogative meaning (use) of “schräg” describing jazz by German propaganda. Maybe due to the improvisation in performing jazz in contrast to classical music, where you have to play your part by strict rules. And also that it might have sound unconventional, schräg. In other context “schräg” has no derogative meaning at all, just sloping, slanted. So in fact it was playing with words, 1. using their actual meaning (slanted guns),, and 2. their unusual, unconventional aspect, not playing by strict rules (like jazz), and 3. it could as well be a tongue in cheek reference to the unloved (by the officials) so called “Negermusik” (negro music). So it was not the reference to jazz itself, but the meaning that was imposed officially. But maybe someone else has a better explanation 😉
    Michael

    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #892915
    redvanner
    Participant

    Right. To cite from his “Wings of the Luftwaffe”: “I was interested to ascertain what sort of view the instructor had for landing. The answer was none!” But there are several aspects to consider: 1. Usually no one would fly the G-12 from the rear seat solo. Only a very experienced testpilot like Eric Brown would have even considered it. 2. The primary use of the G-12 was to get the pupils accustomed to the 109 when converting from Arado 96 (or similar AT). 3. It was a lot better than let the pupil alone in the 109´s, as done before, and risking even more lifes and a/c due to reduced training. 4. When converting, the pupils should be able to land, especially with hints and advice from the instructor. BTW: In late 1944 the rookie pilots coming to an operational unit had ~ 102 hours training, including conversion traing on 109´s. Well, nowadays a pilot getting conversion training on the 109 will definitely have more than 102 hours under his belt. There is no need to hurry, instructors might have more hours than those in late war (contrary to the Allies, experienced German pilots loathed to be instructors, avoided it as long as possible, so those instructors were not the most experienced 109 pilots). So vision is zil from the rear seat when landing. But you should have some confidence in the pilot in the front seat. If not, don´t get into the rear. It´s that simple.

    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #893701
    redvanner
    Participant

    Interestingly there is a different solution. I do not know why Messerschmitt / Blohm & Voss (B+V did the conversion) did not go that way, I guess (nothing but a guess) there were not enough “blown” canopy parts available due to production capacities. The G-12 canopy takes a lot of work, it´s not just take 2 single seater ones. The solution I´m talking of is the one used in the (late) Avia CS series (99 and 199). On the early ones they just used the parts (canopies) available (already produced). The late 2 seater Avias used a canopy very similar to the one fitted to the Arado 96 (also produced by Avia). IMHO the second best looking one, the best being the 2 seater Buchons ones.
    Avia CS-199
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]240227[/ATTACH]
    Buchon
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]240228[/ATTACH]

    Michael

    redvanner
    Participant
    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #907517
    redvanner
    Participant

    Volvo powered? What´s the story on finding the engine? Swedish Airforce surplus?

    I have no info about that, but you might want to visit MM´s homepage about the Volvo.

    http://www.meiermotors.com/index.php/aircraft/klassische-motoren/mercedes-benz-db605?showall=&start=4

    pic below taken from MM´s hp, copyright by Matthias.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]240016[/ATTACH]

    Michael

    in reply to: CAS Birds where made of steel?! Relevant today?! #907534
    redvanner
    Participant

    Another possible WWII airframe for a modern conversion that springs to mind is the Hs 129. Yes, the performance was less than expected, but that was a weight / power issue. Henschel intended to use the BMW 801 engines, but that was simply denied (if not outright forbidden) by RLM. So they had to use the low power Gnome-Rhone 14 M engines (~700 to 740 hp each, depending on version, compared to 1700 hp each of the BMW´s). Though severely hampered by lack of power and airspeed (if use of the BMW´s had been possible, the D version would have ~ 2000 hp more than the B version!), it was a very good design and proved its ability in the Russian theatre. If converted to powerful turboprops, modern electronics and modern weapons, it might be a good enough design.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henschel_Hs_129
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]240014[/ATTACH]

    Michael

    redvanner
    Participant

    If there ever was any gold on that train, I strongly doubt it is there any more. There is nothing more valuable (and in handable size) for any “normal” citizen than gold. I do not believe for a second that those people on the train would have filled their pockets first when leaving the site. So it might have been a gold train. But I doubt there is any gold left.Different of course for valuables too large to be taken away easily.

    Michael

    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #907567
    redvanner
    Participant

    That is what I would call a “Heavy Metal” canopy, lol. Watching the pictures just imagine the weight. Really sturdy. But on the other hand it might contribute to stiffen the fuselage in the part weakened by the cutout for the second cockpit. Thank you for the update, Matthias.

    Michael

    redvanner
    Participant

    A good outcome, all things considered.

    It was a mercy that this was not one of the joy-riding fleet two seaters which are now flying very frequently with various operators since the CAA granted approval.
    Twice the headcount equals twice the risk, of course.

    …. and if it were a Cessna C 172 fourth the risk? So what? Ok, a Merlin might have a higher possibility of malfunction than a Continental or Lycoming (though I have no idea if this is the case). Again: So what? Engine problems occur. Period. If it had been a 2-seater Spitfire out for a joyride, 2 most probably would have walked away with (minor) injuries. What are the chances of an accident in a Spitfire compared to a traffic accident on the way to or from the airfield? If you want total safety, you should not leave your bed, but beware: This is the most likely location you will (and most people by far) die in.

    Michael

    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #855064
    redvanner
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Michael,
    Sorry matey something still went wrong…..:D

    Geoff.

    Must have to do with facebook. Another try…

    https://video-fra3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hvideo-xtf1/v/t43.1792-2/11411529_720711451390284_2122687620_n.mp4?efg=eyJybHIiOjE3OTcsInJsYSI6NDA5Nn0%3D&rl=1797&vabr=1198&oh=618b98ad6719ca2bdb7b5e9c70baff65&oe=55AD644D

    If it also won´t work, go to Hangar10´s facebook site, scroll down to 4. July

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Hangar10/274625062665594?fref=ts

    Edit: I have no idea why the direct links via FB seem to work only for a day or so. Never encountered that problem before. The link on Hangar10´s FB site does work though, use that one.

    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #855750
    redvanner
    Participant

    Nice one Michael.
    Griffon Spits are totally bada$$!
    Really smart to operate her off of the grass as well.

    Congrats to all involved.

    Andy Scott

    AFAIK Hangar10 operates all of their planes off grass. I read somewhere – don´t know where – that they even put some of their own money in to improve the grass strip at Heringsdorf airport. IIRC they straightened some bumps and even extended it.

    Michael

    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #855871
    redvanner
    Participant

    Hi All,
    redvanner,
    SORRY, SOMETHING WENT WRONG is all that appears matey….:rolleyes:

    Geoff.

    Geoff, you are right. Didn´t work for me either. Deleted the link and pasted a new one, Now it works (at least for me). Please try again!

    Michael

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 338 total)