dark light

cvrle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #9, for Pictures and Discussion. #2507988
    cvrle
    Participant

    A small addition from Croatia:

    Soko J-20 kraguj, impressed into CroAF service for a short while after being captured from Serb separatists.

    Sorry for the crappy quality, but that was the first time I had a decent camera and was just learning the ropes.

    http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e22/katar26/Kraguj_1.jpg

    And the PC-9M which was delivered only a few months prior:

    http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e22/katar26/PC-9_CroAf.jpg

    Cheers!

    cvrle
    Participant

    Hmmm… While the proposal has merit, I think that the main two problems were the lack of sufficient maneuverability (it was designed as a strike aircraft, after all) and the fact that despite some projects, the US never had the tradition of big interceptors with lotsa missiles – unlike the Soviet Union (Tu-128 et al)…

    Also in service at the time was the Phantom, which was a very, very good airplane…

    in reply to: CroAF Open day at 91st AB Zagreb #2531561
    cvrle
    Participant

    It was decided that the PC-9M satisfies all training requirements…

    Here’s some more:

    Mi-8 in the old camuflage scheme:

    http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e22/katar26/Mi-8_1.jpg

    Mig-21Bis unbuttoned for the 100h hour check:

    http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e22/katar26/Mig-21Bis_121_1copy.jpg

    http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e22/katar26/Mig-21Bis_121_3copy.jpg

    http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e22/katar26/Mig-21Bis_121_4copy.jpg
    Cheers!

    in reply to: CroAF Open day at 91st AB Zagreb #2532102
    cvrle
    Participant

    Three more pics of the Checker -21UM

    The In Flight photo is crappy because it’s cropped…

    http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e22/katar26/Mig-21UM_165_2.jpg

    http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e22/katar26/Mig-21UM_165_1.jpg

    http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e22/katar26/Mig-21UM_165_FlightCrop.jpg

    in reply to: Libya making big ticket weapons purchases #2535360
    cvrle
    Participant

    Not a bad selection, though it looks a little odd buying a dozen each of Flankers and Fulcrums, it would be interesting to see how much cheaper the Fulcrums really are! It might also be interesting to see how they replace their old Yugoslav aircraft, G-2s if memory serves, along with a load of old L-39s. It might be nice to see them getting some new build L-59s or L-159s!

    The Yugoslav press recently made some noise that Yugoslavia is preparing to sell a modernized G-4 to Libya… (24 pcs IIRC). This is a modernized version of the G-4 that isn’t even produced yet, as I understood it – all the aircraft in YAF inventry would be modernized and 24 then ceded to Libya who would fund the programme…

    Keep in mind this is my retelling of a memory of a news article! 😀

    in reply to: Croatian corvette design #2063461
    cvrle
    Participant

    “We had almost total support”

    And who is this “we”?

    It’s obvious that for you this is about ideology and for me it’s about history. This is common with ex-patriate Croats and their descendants – they continue to live in the past, black or red…

    re: moderators. Please keep a close eye on this topic.

    in reply to: Croatian corvette design #2063477
    cvrle
    Participant

    OK, this might get the therad locked and me banned, but I think it has to be said.

    Ustasa, calling your choice of nick as being unfortunate would be an understatement, a well as your position on ustase:

    “because theyre the only ones who actually fought for croatia”

    For the Record – the Ustase movement Never had any widespread support among the Croatian populace. The main Croatian political party at the time (From the end of the WW I to the fall of the 1st Yugolsavia) was “Hrvatska Seljacka Stranka”, HSS – directly translated as “Croatian Peasant Party”. It was a democratic christian organization deeply rooted in villages and agrarian regions. The Ustase movement was a terrorist organization. Why terrorist – because any organization that advocates the use of arms and assasinations for achieving a political gain can be clled terrorist. They CAN NOT under any circumstances be called “freedom fighters” simply because most of Croatians at the time didn’t even hear of them or care about them, much less supported them. Croatians in 1941 stood behind the HSS which gained large concessions from Belgrade in terms of autonomy – a new administrative unit called “Banovina Hrvatska”.
    When Germans attacked Yugoslavia (and even before) they attempted to get the leader of the HSS, dr. Vlatko Maček, to form an “independent” Croatian government. He refused, because he was an anti-nazi. Furthermore, he went on radio and asked the people to submit so there would be no unecessary loss of life. He was somewhat of an idealist, possibly not really grasping the reality of the situation. He was interned during the war by the Ustashe puppet regime, and later fled Communist Yugoslavia.

    here endeth the history lesson.

    I apologize to the moderators for the extensive off-topic post, but these are tha facts, and I wanted to stop the tendency of this thread to go towards political debate, although I am fully concious that I may be adding fuel to the fire. If this post is felt to be imflammatory or inappropriate, delete it, but I felt obliged to point out some facts.

    edited for spelling

    in reply to: Serbian Air Forces After Divorce #2540651
    cvrle
    Participant

    I know they started overhauling the Mig-29s locally, but I don’t know if they will be upgraded as well.

    They seem quite cash-stripped, and their reorganization seems to be moving slowly forward.

    Someone from Serbia will know more.

    in reply to: Pictures of Croatian Armed Forces and their Equipment #2546597
    cvrle
    Participant

    Re S-300

    As far as the S-300 system is concerned, the only part of the system that was delivered were the launch containers with the missiles. No launchers or any other associated systema were delivered (to my knowledge). The only time they were shown in public was on a military parade and the containers were loaded onto a flatbed trailer towed by a MAN truck. Sorry, I don’t have a scanner to scan you the photo…

    The subject in Croatia is a highly political one, and Croatian authorities are currently attempting to extradite the retired general (who was a part of the deal) for embezzlement.

    in reply to: L-159 Alca #2548792
    cvrle
    Participant

    Slight O/T

    Further chance of L159A or B is in Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Greece, Thailand. Albania has a interest in used ex Czech Air Force L159A (but no money)

    A sale to Croatia is highly unlikely. Our training needs are covered by the PC-9 and our attack needs are to be filled by a new fighter that will replace the current Mig-21s. The requirement for the replacement fighter is geared towards an aircraft in the F-16/Gripen class.

    in reply to: How difficult it is to modify J-10 for carrier landing? #2555752
    cvrle
    Participant

    The rapm (Ski-jump) is decidedly lower tech than a catapult (way simpler). Usually when using a ski-jump, a conventional aircraft cannot carry as much fuel and/or armaments as when taking off from a conventional runway.

    The J-10 could, in all likelyhood, take off using a ski-jump, but the question is what kind of load it could carry, and what would be the stress on the fuselage/landing gear etc…

    I don’t believe the J-10 is capable of carrier use…

    Cheers!

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #8, for Pictures and Discussion. #2529978
    cvrle
    Participant

    Interesting… a very similar winch placement (IIRC, it was a little lower, almost directly over the door, and the upper door was removed) was used on one (that i know of, unfortunately I have no pictures, there’s a newspaper low-quality one floating around) Cro AF Mi-24. It was then used for MedEvac duties. Wonder if that’s the logic behind this winch as well?

    in reply to: Pictures of Croatian Armed Forces and their Equipment #2530402
    cvrle
    Participant

    By law, accoridng to the freedom of information act, any citizen of the Republic of Croatia can request any official document for viewing unless the document is classified (either the document itself or its contents).
    However, in practice, the state administration is very sluggish. Most of what does come up in the media are disposition of funds per ministry.
    Getting your hands on the actual budget disposition for the Ministry of Defense would be… difficult- Croatia’s government is not very open with its financial documents…

    As far as I know, tanks are not high on the list of priorities. This may change, of course after the next elections…

    in reply to: Pictures of Croatian Armed Forces and their Equipment #2530651
    cvrle
    Participant

    Missed the OR 😮

    in reply to: Pictures of Croatian Armed Forces and their Equipment #2530796
    cvrle
    Participant

    The T-34-85 was NOT used by the Ustashe regime. It was Yugoslav Army Stock (WWII/post WWII vintage) captured by Croatian forces at the beginning of the war for independence and subsequently used operationally by Croatian Army.

    Re UAVs

    The text does say that the deal for procurement is done/near done. However, if this is so, there is a possibility that laws regarding the procurement of military materials have been violated, since, by law, industrial offset is required for every contract.
    The budget for next year is about to come up, we’ll see if these are budgeted for.
    I, personally, am sceptical, since there were always rumours flying around that Croatia is buying something from the Israel, from Merkava tanks via assault rifles to Kfir fighters…

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)