dark light

Jinan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 544 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2285645
    Jinan
    Participant

    Most likely shot down by pro Russian separatists. Obviously a mistake, but is this going to draw others directly into the conflict?

    300 passengers, 200 Dutch. I’m pissed!

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2285648
    Jinan
    Participant

    Looks like a smaller missile if it was. 70kg HE (Buk) would surely make a larger hole. I mean some anti-ship missiles, like MARTE, only have 70kg warheads.

    You would have to ask, how the hell can anyone possibly know that a Buk shot it down? They don’t even know who fired it yet. Almost as soon as ‘SAM’ was heard, ‘Buk’ was heard too.

    This is what a 74kg warhead does (1:08):

    HEIGH/DISTANCE of engagement.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2028636
    Jinan
    Participant

    I see. Well, it no launchers are mounted (yet), then that is a good use of the space. Perhaps IAI/Barak isn’t out of the corruption woods yet. A similar sysem appears missing on P15a Kamorta
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_lk70Jq3Pgw/U8OEnJCnbmI/AAAAAAAAy_w/zgudANXAahc/s1600/INS+Kamorta.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2028696
    Jinan
    Participant

    I am hard pressed to figure out where the Baraks would go.

    Well, if she was built the way she was modelled, then they are to port and starboard of that particular radar position.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Images/Project28b.jpg

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-h5I24kOMW04/T3mgRhjhiAI/AAAAAAAABGA/SmUq4esoGv4/s1600/Project+28+ASW+corvette+with+bow-mounted+sonar.JPG

    Question is whether the VLUs were actually installed…

    http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/3365/shipep.jpg

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-d7KslCJbEek/U6lzLPg8kSI/AAAAAAAAGYI/JZ1BMKoGW6g/s1600/ASWC+at+FOJ.jpg

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2028714
    Jinan
    Participant
    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2028716
    Jinan
    Participant

    More Ships, At Least On Paper, In New Fleet Plan

    Under new rules by which the Navy counts ships in its battle force, the ship totals have changed compared with previous years. The changes allowed the Navy, among other things, to count its two hospital ships and deployed coastal patrol vessels in the battle force. The changes are somewhat controversial, as some feel the Navy is inflating its ship count.

    A chart using the old counting methods is included at the end of the report. A comparison with the new counting rules shows a number of differences. The fleet in 2015, according to the new rules, has 284 ships. Under the old rules, that would be 274. The new rules show about 10 ships more per year than the old rules, although that margin drops to single digits in 2019 and continues to drop.

    What is a 3-4% difference, that declines over time, to a navy this size?
    This is SOOOOOO BOGUS, it is not worth the ruckus.
    Besides, support vessels have always been counted, see Reagan’s 600-ship navy
    If your mission changes (e.g. more humanitarian missions or offhore support of land combat) then perhaps it is wise to modify what you count.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2028826
    Jinan
    Participant

    Hi, how is the IN going to employ ASW? For example, will IN be sending out ASW corvettes to the ocean looking for PN subs, or will it primarily use it for defensive patrol against attack on strategic targets? Or maybe an escort in a naval task force?

    It will have to protect its key bases, harbors, trade routes. And provide fleet escorts.

    in reply to: Indian Missiles News #1788742
    Jinan
    Participant

    Maitra?

    in reply to: Pakistan Navy #2028929
    Jinan
    Participant

    As per Alan Warnes tweet just now, PN looking at aqquring two more ATR72s in addition to the two already aqquired

    ATR-72 replaces Fokker F-27, of which there were 7 in PN service. Will there eventually be 7 ATR?

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2028991
    Jinan
    Participant

    As anyone can plainly see flight operations are not being conducted. During flight operations when aircraft are moving around the deck full safety gear is mandatory. Otherwise you will die. Here are a couple of videos that hopefully will educate you of how dangerous the flight deck really is

    Yeah, but it does show how misrepresentative some pics can be. Also, I think you missed a quote. “Providing the right clothing and protective wear for the right environment is essential and although this sounds obvious, few navies think this through. Temperate wear in a hot environment saps strength, is uncomfortable and has a huge effect on morale. “

    IN has been at this game for decades, you would think they have an incling. Or perhaps they make different trade-offs. Which may be valid.

    During flight ops?
    http://i.imgur.com/IntQSRn.jpg

    How about

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-l4Q-sPBXU1s/TzywE4uepCI/AAAAAAAAOyg/kcYV4IgtwQo/s1600/SRKL4483-ed.jpg

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]229873[/ATTACH]

    http://www.livefistdefence.com/2012/02/exclusive-photos-indian-navy-tropex.html

    Helmet, earmuffs, gloves, shoes, vest ….

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]229874[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2029011
    Jinan
    Participant
    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2029017
    Jinan
    Participant

    What sensor is on that second mast?

    Elta EL/M 2221 STGR

    in reply to: Zumwalt taking shape……….. #2029019
    Jinan
    Participant

    Prototype testing… :angel:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]229710[/ATTACH]

    I´ll get me hat…

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-x8wIPdWFmUA/T4pEuS-ADzI/AAAAAAAADCo/2X3i3yVl-zU/s1600/DDG-1000%2BZumwalt%2B7%2Btesting.jpg
    Testing on a scale model of USS Zumwalt

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Advanced_Electric_Ship_Demonstrator.jpg
    1/5 powered scale model built and tested. This was a 133-foot model located at the Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, Acoustic Research Detachment in Bayview, Idaho and operated on Lake Pend Oreill.
    http://www.asiandefencenews.com/2012/04/cutting-edge-navy-warship-uss-zumwalt.html

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2029024
    Jinan
    Participant

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2029029
    Jinan
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]229860[/ATTACH]

    Any time there are preparations for flight operations flight quarters will be announced to all hands over the ship’s 1MC announcing system and the flight deck will be manned as prescribed by the watch, quarter, and station bill.

    Crewmembers not directly involved in flight operations are not permitted on the flight deck or in the catwalks.

    Safety Equipment

    Anytime a medical representative is required on the flight deck they will be issued the proper safety equipment. The required flight deck protective equipment (NA00-80T-105/106) will always include the following items:
    •Flight deck (steel-toed) safety shoes – All personnel assigned workstations on the flight deck, catapult and arresting gear, aviation fuels and ordnance spaces shall wear flight deck safety shoes.
    •Prescribed properly stenciled protective jersey – Those personnel assigned flight quarters stations on or above the hangar deck shall wear the prescribed, properly stenciled protective jersey.
    •HGU-24/P or -25/P cranial impact helmet – Flight deck personnel shall wear the HPG-24P/25P cranial impact helmet or equivalent during flight operations.
    •Protective Eye Goggles
    •Sound attenuators, which is usually incorporated into the HGU-24/P helmet
    •Flotation gear “Float Coat” with the accompanying equipment to include a dye marker, whistle and survival light.

    http://www.brooksidepress.org/Products/Military_OBGYN/Textbook/MilitaryOrganizations/NavalAviationMedicine/FlightDeckSafety.htm

    “Flight deck efficiency rests on a combination of equipment, procedures and training.”

    GE: How big a role does equipment play in the mix?

    KM: Equipment has to be well thought out and thoroughly tested for reliability. Providing the right clothing and protective wear for the right environment is essential and although this sounds obvious, few navies think this through. Temperate wear in a hot environment saps strength, is uncomfortable and has a huge effect on morale. The same can be said when operating in North Atlantic conditions and being cold and wet for an eight-hour watch. Lighting systems, both conventional and NVG, should reliable be too, and aid both aircrew and ground crew – and that’s not always the easiest of compromises.

    Changing and updating these systems can be both expensive and time consuming, particularly if the initial fit is not up to standard.

    http://www.naval-technology.com/features/feature122035/

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 544 total)