dark light

Jinan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 544 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2032944
    Jinan
    Participant

    Philippines Seeks More US Navy Ships Amid China Threat

    Perhaps OHPs are better than Hamilton WHECs….

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2032948
    Jinan
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224614[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]224615[/ATTACH]

    I would cut the numbers to 32 but purchase more capable LCS’s.

    You may yet see a variant of the United States Coast Guard’s National Security Cutter (NSC) ….

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2032952
    Jinan
    Participant

    Jinan,
    I have been studying the development of the new units of MM to take over the Soldati, Minerva, and Cassiopea classes from years now, and it happens that I have read years ago the outdated document you just posted here.

    Thx for clarification of this. Is there some sort of CG or pic or model for the UPAD as you discussed it?

    in reply to: Iskander-K anti-ship role ? #2032956
    Jinan
    Participant

    No, Novator has nothing whatsoever to to do with Iskandar-K cruise missile.

    Well, enlighten us as to the cruise missile then: you know this how?

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2033005
    Jinan
    Participant

    Not properly OPVs, but more similiar to frigades, they should be divided in 2 sub-classes: UPAD Light and UPAD Combat.

    UPAD = Unità Pattugliamento Altura Duale = dual role (OPV / Light frigate) patrol unit = Maritime Security Ships to replace Comandanti, Minerva, Cassiopea & Sirio classes

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224563[/ATTACH]
    See page 22 of http://www.marina.difesa.it/conosciamoci/notizie/Documents/2013/06/Linee_programmatiche_Marina_Militare.pdf

    in reply to: São Paulo status? #2033014
    Jinan
    Participant

    I understand that the two-seat Skyhawk was unable to operate from a colossus/majestic class aircraft carrier, so two part question: did Brazil purchase any two-seat Skyhawks and if so are they able to operate from São Paulo?

    1998: authority to operate carrier based fixed wing aircraft for the Navy was granted by Presidential decree No. 2538.
    1999: acquisition of 20 A-4KU Skyhawks and three TA-4KU trainer aircraft from the Kuwait Air Force
    2000: The first AF-1 (A-4KU) flight in Brazil, first touch-and-go on the Brazilian Navy carrier Minas Gerais
    2001: The first arrested landing and catapult launch from Minas Gerais of an A-4

    Minas Gerais remained in service until 2001, when she was replaced by NAe São Paulo. The São Paulo was purchased while still operational, an unusual process for such a large ship. She was received by the Brazilian Navy and was incorporated into the Brazilian Navy on 15 November 2000. Since 2001, by Brazilian invitation, pilot qualification tests of the Argentine Navy’s Dassault-Breguet Super Étendards and S-2T Turbo Trackers take place on the Brazilian Navy carrier São Paulo, as Argentina now lacks a carrier of their own. 12 singleseat and 3 twoseat Skyhawks to be modernized and kept in service through 2025.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2033016
    Jinan
    Participant

    Well, since I’ve been “out” since June 1989, I’ve gotten used to the civilian life.

    Roger wilco. (silly me :o)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224874[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2033089
    Jinan
    Participant

    After commissioning and on return voyage, the most visible item missing is the ‘duplicate’ white dome that used to be there at the stern. Its missing now and nothing underneath, so maybe it was probably a dummy stuff?

    You mean that small dome, at the starboard stern corner? Doubt that was a dummy (why a dummy?)
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224416[/ATTACH]

    http://www.wrk.ru/forums/attachment.php?item=362501&download=2&type=.jpg

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224418[/ATTACH]

    Read also
    http://trishul-trident.blogspot.nl/2011/11/more-naval-updates.html

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2033105
    Jinan
    Participant

    Similar scenes happened scores of times in the 1960s-90s… with differing USN fighters escorting the Bear.

    While I don’t have a photo available, in October 1987 I was aboard CV-61 Ranger in the Arabian Sea, when a Bear flew over us at low altitude. Since we were stood down from air operations for a “steel beach party”, it was escorted by a F-8E(FN) from Clemenceau (we were conducting joint exercises).

    Aren’t you bored, now that you’re out?

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2033168
    Jinan
    Participant

    The Izumo is a destroyer capable of carrying helicopters or is simply as a helicopter carrier?.

    Despite appearances, Japan insists Izumo is not an aircraft carrier

    http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/AJ201401070039

    The Invincible class has its origins in a sketch design for a 6,000 ton, guided-missile armed, helicopter carrying escort cruiser intended as a complement to the much larger CVA-01-class fleet aircraft carrier. In February 1963, the Hawker P.1127 VTOL (vertical take-off and landing) aircraft had landed and taken-off from the carrier Ark Royal and the subsequent Hawker-Siddeley Kestrel had undergone trials from the “Commando carrier” (an aircraft carrier operating helicopters) HMS Bulwark. It was therefore perfectly possible that the new “cruisers” could be used to operate VTOL aircraft. The new ships were called “through-deck cruisers” and not “aircraft carrier”. Economic problems in the UK in the early 1970s delayed progress on the new ships, but the design continued to evolve. The order for the first ship was given to Vickers (Shipbuilding) on 17 April 1973. By now, the design was for a 19,000 ton “CAH” (helicopter carrying heavy cruiser, styled after the US Navy hull classification symbols) with up to fourteen aircraft and a Sea Dart missile launcher on the bows. The class also had, since 1976, a secondary role as an helicopter carrier, or LPH. The “aircraft carrier” name did not officially appear in association with the ships until 1980….

    First ordered 17 April 1973
    First commissioned 11 July 1980

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible-class_aircraft_carrier

    “Through-deck cruiser: the new capital ship”, Michael A Cairl, US Naval Institute Proceedings, December 1978
    http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=8002.0

    USSR actually built aircraft carrying heavy cruisers (Kievs, Kuznetsov)

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2033169
    Jinan
    Participant

    INS Vikramaditya replenishment (small scale) at sea. It will give an idea of what the starboard area will mainly be used for.

    You can hardly call that replenishment at sea: she is not moving and within clear sight of land. Clearly, during her maiden trip to India, she will be taking spares and such along. That is stuff she would not normally carry. Unless perhaps e.g. on a humanitarian mission, or when used in helicopter assault role. Which would be exception rather than rule, imho.

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2033184
    Jinan
    Participant

    The “Enforcer” family is being offered in three different beams and different displacements ranging from 8,000 to 22,000 tons

    http://www.epicos.com/WARoot/News/AmphibiousAssaultPowerProjection.pdf

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2033186
    Jinan
    Participant

    Interesting pic, any details on where this happened and when?

    A U.S. Navy Grumman F-14A Tomcat from Fighter Squadron VF-111 Sundowners intercepting an Indian Navy Tupolev Tu-142MK-E (NATO reporting code “Bear F”) in 1988. VF-111 was assigned to Carrier Air Wing 15 (CVW-15) aboard the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70) for a deploymant to the Western Pacific and the Indian Ocean from 15 June to 16 December 1988.
    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:F-14A_VF-111_intercepting_Indian_Tu-142MK-E.JPEG

    Another here (probably same series) http://www.defenseimagery.mil/imagery.html#guid=18efe03b3cf0566c6821d070940492c448ff5f66
    DN-SN-89-06997
    An air-to-air right side view of an Indian Navy Soviet-made Tu-142 Bear F reconnaissance aircraft, right, and a US Navy F-14A Tomcat from Fighter Squadron 114 (VF-114), left.
    Photographer’s Name: UNKNOWN
    Location: UNKNOWN
    Date Shot: 5/5/1989
    Date Posted: unknown
    VIRIN: DN-SN-89-06997
    DNSN8909163

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2033188
    Jinan
    Participant

    Japan and India to collaborate on developing the Shin Meiwa US-2 amphibian..wonder what joint development means since its a developed product already..

    DefenseNews article

    It is a search and rescure plane, based on an MPA. Maybe India is seeking to get it back into an MPA version. Or maybe they are just going to modernize (glass cockpit, engines etc).

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #2033190
    Jinan
    Participant

    Er – it hasn’t. It’s selected a design based on it. It may be the Athlas 20000, a smaller (with no ski-jump) derivative of JC1, which fits the specification published by the Turkish authorities.

    JC1 is Athlas 26000. There’s also Athlas 20000 (LHD & LKA/LPA), Athlas 13000 (Galicia class LPD) & 8000 (LPD)
    In reality, however, there is not really a true family. JC1/BPE was developed separately. So was Galicia (is actually member of the Dutch Damen/Schelde Enforcer family). Perhaps Athlas 20000 is developed from JC1 (scaled down, just like the Thai carrier is a scaled down PdA). Coincidentally, the Dutch Enforcer familiy also has an 8000 ton LPD, so it stands to reason the Spaniards have their own version of that (just like Galicia is related to Rotterdam, and their AOR is almost identical to the Dutch Amsterdam AOR)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224347[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224350[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224349[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224348[/ATTACH]

    “ATHLAS 20000: The displacement range lies between 16,000 and 23,000 tonnes. LHD, LHA,
    LPD and LKA are foreseen. The Athlas LHD 20,000 and the Athlas LPA 20,000 are the designs
    that were proposed for the joint Belgium/Luxembourg, amphibious transport vessel, both with
    dock, one with flush deck for helicopter landing and take-off and the second one only with aft
    flight deck. The Athlas LHD 20,000 is offered as a variant of its big brother, the Athlas LHD
    26000, in amphibious programmes with flush deck.”

    http://www.infodefensa.com/wp-content/uploads/JCI_en_v2.pdf
    http://turkishnavy.net/2013/12/31/technical-specifications-of-turkish-lpd/

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 544 total)