PDV-The New Interceptor, To Test Early Next Year : SA To RM
Its exo-atmospheric, and would intercept at an altitude of 150 kms, targets at range 2000 kms and mark the completion of the first phase of India’s BMD, said Dr Saraswat today.
Agni-III Inducted Into Services (SFC), Undergoing Production and Agni-V test before year end : Dr Saraswat
I wonder if they agreed for such a project, which platform will be the base platform? Russian, Indian or will they create a new platform for the new fighter? Is there going to be a Russian version or is it just an technical assistance agreement? In my opinion the best thing is to wait and see the details :confused:
I think it is AMCA, where India and Russia will cooperate on some technologies. FGFA based on PAK FA and this new aircraft will be based on AMCA concept.
A DRDO developed AESA radar Arudhra inducted in IAF
^^^Excellent shots. Specially Gripen and LCH one!!! Whoever taken it kudos to him.
Gripen don’t know that a fierce tiger approaching… :diablo:
I think Russia currently don’t have a FADEC engine but developing one for PAK FA but does China has any FADEC engine?
http://www.grandestrategy.com/2010/12/19203339391ucavs-future-of-air-warfare.html
Abstract:
The Indian Air Force is projected to induct a large number of 5th generation fighter aircraft within the timeframe of 2025. This poses serious challenges for the numerically smaller Pakistan Air Force (PAF). The paper suggests UCAVs as a possible solution in countering Indiaβs military aviation threat to Pakistan. Pakistan can develop UCAVs in the same manner they developed the JF-17. The argument is in favor of UCAVs to supplement 4th generation fighters and enumerates an active and specific solution for PAF.
You can scroll down on the link page to download a somewhat large pdf version.
Funny staff. Pakistan didn’t made JF-17, its build under tech transfer from China. No country will have enough mature technology for UCAV by 2020 and Pakistan is out of question. :rolleyes:
First Pakistani made helicopter….
so, if this is all genuine… figure by 2015 China should have 100-200 of these birds in service, plus more advanced version in works. How many Su-50s will Russia have in service by then?
At least 500. If China can manage to have 2015 than Russia can have more than 500.
Here Gripen is looking better because pics taken by better cameras! π Both fighters look good to me. π
All pics from BR….





can anyone here tell me which 3D radar is this on board Shivaik? is it EL/M-2238 STAR??…
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/S9p973qbzqI/AAAAAAAAKTU/8eRfNtUiYcY/s1600/P1000661-787091.JPG
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/S9kEv2aS-_I/AAAAAAAAKQ0/q7JRHD7XJgI/s1600/DSC00272-727945.JPG
Indian Navy’s New Fleet Tanker Launched in Italy

http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/02/photos-indian-navys-new-fleet-tanker.html
India’s ASAT Concept A Hybrid Of Agni And AAD
While India doesn’t have a formal anti-satellite weapon programme, the country’s top missile scientists revealed this week that they have gradually laid the groundwork for precisely this sort of weapon. In fact, Dr Avinash Chander, director of India’s Advanced Systems Laboratory (ASL), has revealed that if the government calls upon DRDO to deliver such a weapon, it would take less than three years to first test.
According to Dr Chander, “We have developed technology blocks that can be integrated to create an anti-satellite weapon. What we need is the technology to boost the munition into space, which we have proven very robustly with the Agni programme. And we need a kill vehicle of considerable energy and terminal phase accuracy, which our scientists have proven with the advanced air defence (AAD) interceptor tests. We can put these blocks together and finetune the weapon as an anti-satellite platform. If we are required to, we can deliver this.”
DRDO chief Dr VK Saraswat was more circumspect. “We already have a design study of such a weapon, but at this stage the country does not require such a platform in its strategic arsenal. Testing such a weapon also has a lot of repercussions which have to be taken into consideration. But testing is not an issue — we can always rely on simulations and ground test. We can see in the future if the government wants such a weapon. If so, our scientists are fully ready to deliver it.”
I was listening to Saraswat lecture on the old link given by Ab. The points which I found interesting were;-
Hellina = Helo launched Nag with range of 7km will have datalinks
AAD radar is 20kg, with 30km range against 0.3 sq meter target
AAD, Ad-1, AD-2 will also have anti cruise missile capability as these missiles are expected to cruise at heights from 10-20m to 1km which can be dealt with by them
Its Helina not Hellina.
I guess you mean AAD’s seeker not radar.
Its AAD and AD-1 that can be used as anti-cruise missile system not AD-2. AD-2 or PDV like PAD is a high altitude interceptor.