dark light

Rajan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 623 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2554088
    Rajan
    Participant

    errm I dont see that written in the document so where do you got that is the cockpit for Naval Tejas? :confused:

    They did not directly mentioned its for Naval Tejas but if you read the article carefully…

    The Flight Mechanics and Control Division is engaged in R&D and Technology pursuits in the areas of modelling and parameter estimation, flight simulation, flight control, multi-sensor data fusion, and air traffic man-agement and simulation. The flight test programme of DRDO/ADA’sTEJAS aircraft, for which NAL is lead-ing the flight control law develop-ment activity, has been progressingwell and a total of 127 flights weresuccessfully carried out by NFTC, ADA on five prototypes of the aircraft during the year. The fly-by-wire con-trol laws and air data algorithms were also redesigned/ updated tomatch the aerodynamic configura-tion of the Airforce two-seater variant. The distributed PC based ELS(DELS) system was released for evaluation with the installation of actual pilot controls (Figure 8). The simulator is also being enhanced to facilitate naval control law development.

    http://www.cmmacs.ernet.in/nal/pdf/dr07.pdf

    Its clearly mentioned that this PC based ELS(DELS) system is installed with ‘actual pilot controls’ and being enhanced to facilate ‘naval control law’, now every one knows only one fighter is under-development in India for Navy that is Naval Tejas, which is going to fly next year. Other than this, there is no fighter for which such a cockpit/sim NAL/DRDO/ADA could develop….

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2554179
    Rajan
    Participant

    Naval LCA simulator

    Naval LCA cockpit cum simulator with the installation of actual pilot controls and also being enhanced to facilate the naval control law development.

    Looks futuristic………..

    http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/6247/cockpitix0.jpg

    😎

    from the report of the NAL Director

    http://www.cmmacs.ernet.in/nal/pdf/dr07.pdf

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2555351
    Rajan
    Participant

    lca radar

    good job……..the video is excellent. this LCA reminds me the Rafale. btw as far as radar is concerned the last news i have read………. “the phased array radar been mounted on the LCA.” 😀

    in reply to: Indian navy – news folder July 2007 #2045121
    Rajan
    Participant

    I’ld take that with a BIG grain of salt. There would have been news coverage.
    Besides, that wiki post says “the ship is expected to be commissioned into service by October 2007″, not that is actually was commissioned.

    Shivalik was scheduled as followed (from Bharat Rakshak);
    Laid Down – 11 July 2001
    Launched – 18 April 2003
    Commissioning – September 2007.

    Yet, on April 18 2003 the Beeb already reported
    “India trials stealth frigate”, thus confusing launch (=hull hitting the water) with commissioning (=entering service).

    See: http://www.wikimapia.org/#lat=18.969184&lon=72.849028&z=18&l=0&m=a&v=2

    Why do you think there was a follow up order for 3 more Talwar class ships? Because the P17s were coming along as planned?

    more P17 infos: http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=73443

    yeah, but than also i think four years are enough for launch-to-commission. But i have read in an interview that MDL director told that they have done alot of changes in design from the projected one.

    The pics from the wiki/google earth are very old i have seen them 3 years ago……the latest pics are from NDTV but not INS Shivalik, they were INS Satpura and INS Sahyadri.

    The 3 more Talwar class ships were ordered because Indian shipyards cannot fulfil IN’s fleet req……..ie no of ships…

    Rajan
    Participant

    excellent! want to know more about these missiles. what is the launcher in last image? PAC-3?

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2504310
    Rajan
    Participant

    Militarily India doesn’t have any relation or has very little with Syria or Iran. Palestinians need to first sort out their internal issues. I had heard rumors of pilot exchanges a few years back but never expected it to come out in the open.

    i think India shouldnt really care about her so called ‘good relation’ with Iran. Iran have huge reserve of gas and oil, thats good, and we really need them, not not compromising the question of national security. Israel is the most important nation for India after Russia……as far as security is concerned…. dont know how many projects going on with them…….. 😀

    BTW i think the PAK FA deal signed is the most important news for IAF in some years after the Phalcon.

    So far this year we had one good news (confirmed) for army, navy and air force each…

    Army–> AGNI-III
    NAVY–> AKULA-II and ATV
    AIR FORCE–> FGFA (PAK FA)

    :diablo:

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2504455
    Rajan
    Participant

    ^^ but isnt that will cast shadow over India-Syria or India-Iran relations??? What about India’s long time support for ‘free Palestine’!!!

    in reply to: Indian navy – news folder July 2007 #2045498
    Rajan
    Participant

    P-17?

    P-17

    Any news about P-17? Wiki reports that first ship, “INS Shivalik has been handed over to the Indian Navy for sea trials and the ship is expected to be commissioned into service by October 2007”. Any news? any pics?

    in reply to: An IAI Phalcon video #2504547
    Rajan
    Participant

    Thats not Phalcon afaik, but the American program to combine AWACS, C4ISR etc into one aircraft..

    this is taken from IAI website……..

    http://www.iai.co.il/ELTA.aspx?docID=26538&FolderID=33785&lang=en&res=0&pos=0

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2504562
    Rajan
    Participant

    FGFA

    MOD press release

    INDIA AND RUSSIA SIGN LANDMARK AGREEMENT FOR JOINT DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION OF FIFTH GENERATION FIGHTER AIRCRAFT

    TALKS TO EXTEND MILITARY COOPERATION AGREEMENT BEYOND 2010 WITH RUSSIA HAS STARTED: ANTONY
    ——————————————————————————–

    20:4 IST

    India and Russia today signed a landmark Intergovernmental Agreement for the joint development and joint production of the Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA), marking the beginning of cooperation in the development of state of the art new technology major weapon systems. The agreement was signed by the Secretary Defence Production Mr KP Singh and Deputy Director of the Federal Service for Foreign Military Cooperation Mr. Vyacheslav Dzirkaln in the presence of the Defence Minister Mr. AK Antony and his Russian counterpart Mr. Anatoly Serdyukov in Moscow today. The watershed agreement was signed at the conclusion of the Seventh Meeting of the India- Russia Intergovernmental Commission for Military and Technical Cooperation. Mr Antony and Mr Serdyukov also signed a Protocol which envisages a ‘new strategic relationship’ based on greater interaction at various operational levels.

    Speaking to reporters shortly after the signing ceremony, Mr Antony said the two countries have agreed to strengthen and expand relations in all areas especially in the areas of joint exercises and greater cooperation in the field of Research and Development. “Now the frequency and level of exercises will be higher”, Mr. Antony said. He said talkswith Russia have started to extend the Military Cooperation Agreement beyond 2010. The pact had been signed during the Russian President Mr. Vladimir Putin’s visit to India in 2000.

    The Defence Minister described the Agreement on FGFA as a ‘major landmark’ and said that the Indo-Russian relationship is on a trajectory to reach new heights. He hoped that the two countries would soon sign an Intergovernmental Agreement on co-development and co-production of Multi-Role Transport Aircraft. Mr. Antony expressed satisfaction at the outcome of discussions on other important projects e.g., supply and licensed production of T-90 tanks, SU-30 MKI aircraft and other strategic issues. He admitted that there has been a delay in the delivery of the repaired and refurbished aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov alongwith supply of deck-based fighter aircraft MiG-29-K and said it was decided that some more studies by technical groups would be done to go through the details. He appreciated the efforts made by the Russian side to resolve issues relating to life cycle support of equipment of Russian origin.

    On the question of Integrity Pact, he said, “the objective is neither to create problems for anybody nor to favour anybody. What India wants is transparency in all defence purchases. In the past, there have been a lot of controversies. We want to avoid it. We want speedy modernisation but with transparency. Integrity Pact is one of the safeguards for transparency”.

    The Defence Minister returns home tomorrow.

    in reply to: An IAI Phalcon video #2504563
    Rajan
    Participant

    phalcon

    this vid is quite old i have seen it many years ago, the Indian Phalcon will much more modern and with new Command Control and Operator Stations…….

    in reply to: The Indian MMRCA Saga #2510906
    Rajan
    Participant

    Rajan, Doesn’t Development costs come under R&D Budget seperately allocated in the defence budget?

    Procurements happen in next 5 to 10 years. And enough money will be allocated every year for new purchases as well older ones too. I guess its the problem of MOD, not the IAF. Still we spend around 2.2% of GDP, and babus are at freedom to increase.

    yes, but country’s defense R&D depends on total defense budget. look how many fighters IAF are going to buy, repair, upgrade as well as development of advanced UAV, UCAV, MCA, PAK FA they r tlking about.

    sometimes back i have read an article about IAF’s lack of strategic thinking/planning, it seems really correct. why we need a new MRCA, when we have huge number of MKI (230 totally)? If they need more fighters, why dont simply buy more MKI which is much cheaper than MRCA (126 for $ 10.4 bn)and put rest of the money in R&D of UCAV and MCA?

    OK, if they need something like next generation sensors, we can surely get some (15) F-18G or Rafale (with Spectra) to get advanced EW and sensor suite. Other things like 5th generation avionics, AESA, stealth we can get from Israel, France and Russia. There is no need for huge fighter aircraft deal………………

    in reply to: The Indian MMRCA Saga #2511328
    Rajan
    Participant

    I dont think IAF have so much money to invest on so much fighters and projects. like

    1. SU-30MKI production line
    2. Mig-29SMT/K upg and repair
    3. IJT production
    4. Mig-27 upg
    5. Jag production and upg
    6. LCA final developments and production
    7. Mirage-2000 upg
    8. LIFT development and production
    9. Hawk AJT production
    10. Dhruv ALH production
    11. LCH development and production
    12. CAT development and production
    13. MTA development and production
    14. Saras production
    15. Harrier upg

    And now

    1. MRCA production
    2. PAK FA development and production
    3. UCAV development (DRDO project)

    these will be big burden for HAL as well as IAF, it will be more complicated if an US fighter been choosen.now India will operate fighters from Russia, India, US, UK, France and many inputs from Israel. Current LCA progrogramme have pretty good upgrades with AESA radar, sophisticated Mayavi electronic warfare system, advanced weapons and stealthy structure. So IAF should go for atleast 400 LCA for the next decade. And rest of the money should be invested in PAK FA and UCAV (DRDO).

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2522788
    Rajan
    Participant

    MCA?

    This image is from ARDB (Aeronautics Research and Development Board), DRDO about future aerodynamic design of the fighter aircrafts. Is it the initial drwing of MCA. But MCA supposed to have tailles design….. 😮

    http://www.drdo.com/boards/ardb/images/aerodynamics_img.jpg

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2524479
    Rajan
    Participant

    Sad news for IAF, ‘Its not getting JF-17’. If IAF can get this bird we dont need PAK-FA, MRCA, SU-30 MKI, Mirage-2009, Mig-29SMT………….:D :p 😉

    Senator Dilawar Abbas, a committee member, said, “We have assured Chinese think tanks that we would not sell JF-17 aircraft to India.” He said Chinese think tanks wanted only Pakistan and China to manufacture JF-17 aircraft.

    http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C04%5C13%5Cstory_13-4-2007_pg7_14

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 623 total)