He did not say he did not read it but he was pointing at the fact that India does not have it. Why do you guys try to it personal? think he does a great job. Keep on the good work.
lol Read the post perfectly. :rolleyes:
India-Japan joint air exercise
http://www.hindu.com/2009/12/30/stories/2009123054771000.htm
Well, if you look at the reality then you could do a lot without the SAMS. Just get your Ballistic/Cruise Missiles to blow away runways. Wat is the margin these days? With the load that would not matter a lot.
When one thinks about destroying with BM or CM, SAM like S-400 will keep him at bay. It will give an excellent self-defence capability. Then our own BM and CM can do rest of the job….. we need both… :dev2:
Rajan:
India needs S-400.Rimmer:
India does not have the S-400.we know that. he said India NEEDS it, not that India has it. learn to read. :rolleyes:
lol ‘learn to read!!!!’
he might be increasing number of posts with these types of posts. 😉
Rajan, these pics were taken during refueling trials late summer last year, though many have only been recently published. Which means they’re of the first batch.
This one’s my favourite, beautiful no? why aren’t those guys wearing their TopOwl-Fs? it was integrated ages ago.
😎
Thanks for clarification! India bought TopSight-E for the Mig-29K, but don’t know if it was supplied with the first batch.
…on the topic of ‘Game Changers’ :diablo:
:D:D
I love this missile. For long time I am talking about this! India needs it drastically. How much it costs? Any sale so far? Saudi Arabia got it?
Think like this…
S-400+Barak-NG+SPYDER+Akash……
I am surprised by how small LCA’s intakes are. If you look at J-10s or F-18E/F or Mig-29, those look huge in comparison.
Regards,
Ashish
J-10 one huge intake for single engine.
F-18 two large intakes for two engines.
Mig-29 two large intakes for two engines.
LCA two small intakes for single engine. 😀
Chandrayaan-II launch as per schedule: ISRO
Special Correspondent
The Hindu Mylswamy Annadurai, Project Director, Chandrayaan I and II.
The Chandrayaan-II will be launched as per schedule in the first quarter of 2013 and the design is getting finalised and the metal cutting will start this year, said Mylswamy Annadurai, Project Director, Chandrayaan-I and II of Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), Bangalore, here on Saturday.
Talking to The Hindu, the space scientist said that the Chandrayaan-II would have only a few additional equipments and not to the extent of 11 equipments attached to Chandrayaan-I that was launched recently. The Chandrayaan-II has been planned to land on the moon and make in situ chemical and mineral analysis to confirm the discovery of Chandrayaan-I.
He pointed out that Chandrayaan-II, a four-year project to be launched under Indo-Russia collaboration, would also carry out research on the moon and investigate the possibility of water through scientific study.
Referring to the success of the Chandrayaan-I launch, he said that it was mainly due to the combined efforts and team spirit of the scientists. He pointed out that the Chandrayaan-I launch was considered to be the greatest success in the space research programme.
http://beta.thehindu.com/news/national/article74559.ece?homepage=true
Among Indian forces Navy is doing best…… great days ahead….
Navy tests new waters with N-subs, Indigenous Carrier
Manu Pubby
Saturday , Jan 02, 2010 at 0153 hrs
Unlike the Army and Air Force, the Navy has its modernisation plans on track and the coming year will see a massive addition in capabilities of the country’s smallest armed force. On all fronts — underwater, on the surface, in the air and even outer space — the Navy is set to acquire and add new platforms and assets that will widen its edge over maritime forces of neighbouring countries.
While the Navy has reached blue water capabilities, the absence of a few vital assets has constrained it from showcasing its true potential. The biggest asset the Navy is set to get in 2010 is the Nerpa nuclear attack submarine on a 10-year lease from Russia.
After several delays and hiccups, the re-entry of a nuclear powered platform in the Navy (after the INS Chakra that was also leased from Russia in the 1980s) will be a massive force addition. Besides the obvious benefits of having a stealthy submarine that can stay underwater for several weeks and even give US warships a run for their money, the Nerpa will be a vital training platform. 😀
The Nerpa will help train Indian Navy personnel on nuclear submarine operations, a skill that will be needed to be imparted to a large number of officers and men who will operate the indigenous Arihant class of nuclear submarines in coming years.
While Nerpa will shake things underwater, the Navy will also get longer legs in the coming year that will enable it to deploy ships for longer periods, in further waters than ever before. The induction of a modern tanker ship, which is currently being built by Italian firm Fincantieri, by the end of 2010 is being keenly watched by players in the region.
The tanker ship, which will Refuel and Replenish warships on the high seas, is a major force multiplier for any nation. Its induction in the Indian Navy will mark the entry of a modern tanker that will be used for overseas deployments and will be showcased at all forthcoming exercises.
Also on the surface, the coming year will mark the Historic Launch of India’s First Indigenous Aircraft Carrier. The first of the Vikrant class aircraft carriers, which is under construction in Kochi, will be Launched towards the end of 2010. This will be followed by Fitment of Weapon Systems, Sensors and other Equipment on the Warship.
While the induction will not take place before 2014, the launching of the warship itself will be a major feat, considering that it will be India’s first aircraft carrier as well as the first warship built on a Modular Design.
Corresponding with the carrier, the Navy will finally see its new fighter aircraft, the MiG 29 K flying in Indian skies. While four of the fighters were delivered a few weeks ago, the first flight is expected in early January once the aircraft have been assembled by Russian technicians.
Integrating all these platforms, and bringing the Navy a step closer to network centric warfare, will be the Navy’s first dedicated satellite that is set to be launched by the middle of next year. While the Navy currently relies on other channels of communication, the first ever dedicated military satellite to be launched next year will give it a vital communication link to bring all platforms — fighters, warships, aircraft carriers, submarines and even UAVs — on a common ground. Besides a secure communication channel, the satellite will make it easier to deploy and manage assets as part of the Navy’s network centric strategy.
While delays, hiccups and cancellations are common to all acquisitions in the armed forces, the Navy is set for a complete makeover in the coming year and decade, taking it to its rightful position as the deciding platform for military diplomacy.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/navy-tests-new-waters-with-nsubs-indigenous-carrier/562351/0
21Ankush, you’ve been a very naughty boy. The Pakitan Air Force’s ‘game-changers’ for Waziristan should not be any concern of yours!
Now occupy yourself with tons of MiG-29K/KUB pics:
http://pilot.strizhi.info/photos/v/in-flight_refueling/?g2_page=1
Otaku cool staff. Thanks for sharing….
If the date is accurate than these are the second batch of Mig-29 I guess, because first batch already in India.

[ATTACH]180235[/ATTACH]
What does that sign mean (inside the rectangle)?
the pic is a part of this larger image
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_zUe7sq7m3h0/R8TH7yMzRmI/AAAAAAAAADk/FxI7Q6qIigg/s1600-h/P1090802.JPG
“The canopy will open on this side?” 😀 It doesn’t seem to be on other aircrafts.
Pre 2006 doesn’t mean its not valid. The fact, it still stay there means the spec still valid. If its not valid, U go e-mail the webmaster and ask them clarify. That is an official Pakistan aeronautical complex webpage, not some tom dick , harry website u post.
Actually there are many other aircrafts those were designed to fly at high G condition but that doesn’t mean their operational capabilities will show the same results. I guess the JF-17 was designed to fly at -3 to +8.5 G but later they achieved lower results.
This is the only reply u can give me after misleading abt JF-17 capabilites?
😮 What I have to do with JF-17? I was not talking about JF-17!!! I was talking about parents!
The grammar indicates that info is pre-2006 while the picture is from IDEAS 2008.
The idea about the image being manipulated is kind of paranoid. Why don’t you confirm the manipulation before you accuse somebody of it.
Regards,
Ashis
Second that. I also think the info is old. If you watch various JF17 videos, you can look into it better.
U are too late, I post my source, what u have to say? 😉
Please don’t be personal. Don’t bring mum-dad here. Everyone has some soft feelings and respects for their parents. Just like you love your parents we Indians also do same but in different manner. We see our parents like God. Any disrespectful word about them is very very unfortunate. 🙂
Saab Erieye technologically a mid-range AE&W system as per Dawn article
Here’s why. First, the Airborne Early Warning & Control (AEW&C) system purchased from Sweden is actually a mid-range technology, better than the rival French technology currently in use by the Pakistan Navy but inferior to the much-sought-after-but-denied American Awacs.
article link
Which French AWACS Pakistan uses? Atl? BTW I guess Erieye have two blank points on the front and back side?!
Who told u that? Your mum did, is it? +8.5G is comfirm.
Why personal attack? If you don’t have source for you claim just stay away.
Army to seek 20 SuperCobra helicopters from US
ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Army is likely to seek US Foreign Military Financing (FMF) to acquire 20 Super Cobra helicopters to reinforce its fleet of ageing Cobra attack helicopters, which are being extensively used in operations against terrorists in tribal regions.
According to the Pakistan Assistance Strategy Report published by the US State Department, the army envisions acquiring the SuperCobra helicopters. The helicopters alone, it said, would cost at least $500 million and the total acquisition would cost up to $1 billion.
The report says that SuperCobra attack helicopters will not be available for foreign customers till 2015. Equipping the army with such helicopters earlier than 2015 will require either increased production or their diversion from the US Marine Corps.
The report says that Pakistan is likely to maintain its current force of Cobra helicopters, supplemented by armed Bell 412 aircraft. Pakistan currently has 32 Cobra attack helicopters. The sustainability of the current fleet of the helicopters is difficult but possible through commercial channels.
However, the US government is currently spending $75 million from the Pakistan Counter-insurgency Funds to update a portion of the existing Cobra fleet.
Pakistan army has received two squadrons of Cobras since 1983, later upgraded with the ‘C-NITE thermal imaging’ package.
Unlikely. They could achieve air superiority, but it would take them longer than a few hours.
That will be air dominance. 🙂
Pakistan has tried to maintain a minimum credible detterance ability, and their new acquisitions show that. A lot of these Indian capabilities exist on paper only for the time being, and who knows when they would materialise.
India’s does not get military aid from other countries, so they need to start development or float tender for the weapons thats why many times these weapons are on paper. But those ‘paper weapons’ does comes true, certainly with delay. But show me one of the India’s ‘paper weapons’ that didn’t came true or no indication of coming true.
who knows when they would materialise.
Which one you are talking about?
As for Pakistan, they would try to maintain their minimum credible detterance ability, and I assume they would seek the help of their chinese counterparts in this regard.
Depending on others for war time supply is not a good idea, you know. No country is your friend when they don’t need you any more…… I think you know in details about history of Sino-Pak relations.
PAF is simply taking the route it deems best. Unlike IAF PAF has to deal a lot of availability/affordability constraints, and I guess FC-20 is their logical answer. They said they would buy 36 to start with and (depending on the ground situation) the numbers might go to 150. While they could do so with FC-20, they cannot do the same thing with any western fighters because it would cost way too much. If they want more western fighters, they would simply go for more F-16s, and nothing else now.
Thanks for clarification. PAF did tried to get Gripen first!
Usman Shabir has posted info. regarding this on PakDef. I will try to dig out the relevant posts.
Who is Usman Shabir? Journalist?
It is in all likelihood a variant of Caesar, rather Captor E.
http://ajaishukla.blogspot.com/2008/02/tejas-lca-to-get-high-tech-aesa-radar.html
Note though that the prototype of the Captor E on the EF looks different:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_mDvQ8xYRdSI/SoVichxzo5I/AAAAAAAAADw/EU4mNhejpGw/s400/CAESAR.jpgEADS’s sensors specialist is Selex Galileo which makes the CAPTOR.
I dont recall Thales coming out with a mockup of any AESA radar for the LCA either.
Thanks for the links! It doesn’t matches with any of the existing radars! It might be CAESAR version, it’s elder brother.