dark light

gaofrank

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • gaofrank
    Participant

    Indi, Off the top of my head….

    1. 052B – 2 (168/169)
    2. 052C – 2 (170/171)
    3. 051C – 1 confirmed (115), whether the above 2 are additional ones or 115s twin is still unclear

    4. 054 – 2 (525/526)
    5. Sovremenny:
    — Type 956E – 2 (136/137)
    — Type 956EM – 2 being built

    3. There are definitely 2 of those. A few days ago, our friends on the Chinese boards have confirmed that 115 was towed back to the docks again.

    6. The FACs? 2208/2209/2210/2211, are those being considered as deep water assets?

    7. 527/528, 053H3 class frigates. Built after 525/526.
    8. Around 8-10 new Yuting III class tank landing ship
    9. 804 the new mine sweeper
    10. two new 15000 ton class supply ship

    gaofrank
    Participant

    I think these are gas tanks as the original author pointed out.

    gaofrank
    Participant

    Can some one identify the type of the PAR

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 7 #2631417
    gaofrank
    Participant

    I see 6-7 J-10s in pic 1. But surprised that PLAF didn’t build solid bunkers for the J-10s

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 6 #2641551
    gaofrank
    Participant

    As far as I know, the Lavi project was first funded by the US. Then they realized with the creation of Lavi, Israel would not buy US fighter jets, instead the US stopped funding lavi as well as the technical transfer.

    Now IF China has learned anything from Lavi is a mystery and will most likely remain to be a mystery until Israel becomes an ally of PRC, very unlikely! However, let’s say China did indeed get help from Israel on J-10, it really would not be more than using a few israli designers (they might have used Russian engineers as well), since J-10 finally rolled out with different engine, different radar, different weapon systems and supposed to be used for a different role. I am just wondering, by looking at the two planes from outside, how could u draw the concluding that one is based on the other, just because it’s rumored so? How else would a 4th generation(actually 3.5) figher with canards and air-intake under the fuselage look like?

    in reply to: China's new Yuan-class submarine #2072328
    gaofrank
    Participant

    😉 Frank, you really ought to learn the art of lip-reading. It’s fun! 😉

    Too bad. English is not my first language. In fact, it’s not even my second.

    in reply to: China's new Yuan-class submarine #2072414
    gaofrank
    Participant

    oh?

    So this PLA soldier dude is PSed?

    in reply to: China's new Yuan-class submarine #2072441
    gaofrank
    Participant

    Yuan Pic

    Don’t really know if any one has posted this pic before. But it’s been taken out of major Chinese boards already.http://www.armysky.com/bbs/UploadFile/2004-9/200491519339800.jpg

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)