dark light

Whitley_Project

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 2,284 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Albemarle undercarriage parts? #912930
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Hi Richard – thank very much – that’s really kind. I’m in London – i’ll send you the details.

    All the best
    Elliott

    in reply to: ID to factorystamp #913114
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Yes, the 57 in this case is not related to the aircraft type i’m afraid. If you clean the part up a bit more maybe the first letter would be clearer?

    in reply to: Albemarle undercarriage parts? #913328
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Hi Richard

    I had a look and the access panel you have (68781) was also used on the Whitley cowling. We are looking for one and I wondered if you would consider letting it go? I sent you a pm/email. The AW47 number is just an inspectors stamp and doesn’t relate to the aircraft model – it’s a bit of a red herring.

    All the best
    Elliott

    Sorry I cannot help with your item but I also have some parts from RAF Hampstead Norris, mine were just lying in a ploughed field and I picked them up about thirty years ago, always thought they were Albamarle.
    They are a small access panel with AW47 68781 2 and inspectors stamps RC28 and RC3 and the end of a control rod p/n AW10046 and AW10044. I have always been puzzled as to why it has AW47 on it as the Albamarle was AW41 and the AW47 was never built. I didn’t know some were scrapped there.

    Richard

    in reply to: Albemarle undercarriage parts? #913331
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Your best bet is to contact Automotive products precision hydraulics (APPH) – they are still going and manufactured this part. They did make undercarriage units during the war. The LH stamp could suggest it was made at their Leamington Spa factory.

    in reply to: Dornier Do 17 Two Years On Lecture (12/05/2015) #844516
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    I also think it would look great right side up. Would be a pity if it ended up upside down again.

    in reply to: Beach Find #846964
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    It says Lanc to me too

    in reply to: Beach Find #847267
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Hi – the clamp is a fire extinguisher holder – mid to late WW2. Any part numbers there junk collector?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay (2016) #847425
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Yes, it’s the same item. I moved it on last year.

    in reply to: Stirling Project Update #859179
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Nice work boys!

    in reply to: 'World War II- Battlefield Recovery'…UK Channel 5 TV #861668
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Compare it to this – a completely different league – why would you not take this approach?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTpAXE4WIJM

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #861682
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    A very murky business…

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #862203
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Pat1968 has presented us with some broad, but credible figures for the cost of recovering the P-40 and I would agree with the amounts and his approach. Both Mark12 and Bruce have gone on record to say that £120,000 is a fair price for the P-40 recovery.

    Perhaps they could put their heads together as let us know how they would have spent the remarkable amount of £120,000 to recover this aircraft?

    Just to add, it is not my intention to embarrass anyone but as this deal involved a public assest this figure deserves scrutiny at the very least.

    You are avoiding answering the question. Your cost breakdowns re the P-40. Just broad brush will be fine.

    Just the one email at the weekend to the party that wanted me to recover the Afghan Hinds…that would have been ahead of you.

    I, or rather my wife, turned it down but I recommended he use a current or former service man with connections, to at least arrive in Kabul to a friendly face and a secure base.

    I was invited to look at the containers and photograph the contents on his property when they arrived.

    I published a couple of shots on his behalf some time later, if that was your concern. I think he wanted to show them off minimally as he was proud of the result.

    If you were the sole financier, recoverer, importer, container procurer, transporter and owner, then that was not mentioned to me at that time.

    Mark

    in reply to: 'World War II- Battlefield Recovery'…UK Channel 5 TV #864115
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Some commentry here on the program and its background with some humerous posts:

    How fitting a fate for “Nazi War Diggers”… they hastily buried the program amidst the battle raging around it, allowed it to rest for a while in anonymity, let a little grass grow over it, then dug it up again, dusted it off and now it’s back as “Battlefield Recovery”: New title, same great product!

    http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/battlefield-history-relics/nazi-war-diggers-back-again-607924/

    I should say I have had dealings with Steve in the past through the EU relics forum and he has always been very helpful and a real gent.

    I think C5 had a great opportunity to make a very interesting and classy series of documentaries but sadly went down the tabloid route.

    in reply to: Projects Wants And Trades 2015 #864158
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Any history on those bits Garry?

    in reply to: Halifax Cockpit Project #864502
    Whitley_Project
    Participant

    Are you getting restless again Cees?

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 2,284 total)