Any navy planning to operate outside the range of its own shore-based aircraft, & within the range of enemy aircraft, needs a good AAW capability. Is the IN still thinking in terms of local operations only?
I very much doubt if BAe was thinking in terms of selling Type 45 to India. It was probably a case of trying to boost its visibility as a possible source of expertise in the development & production of Indian AAW ships.
I don’t think IN can see any hostile nation in the IOR which require more than the projected capability(the ships work with the two fleets).
That is what i was saying the market in consulting, systems and and other types of naval vessels is too huge for a major player like BAE to ignore.
Both engines matched the technical requirements of DRDO, and one of them costs less than the other, now you may say that the other engine was better, more advanced, however as far as the DRDO is concerned, both matched the capability it required.
And that is how the MMRCA will be judged, the lowest bidder which satisfies all the technical/operational requirements of the Indian Air Force, not the best plane in the competition.
Indeed. The IN lacks real AAW ships. Hence BAe showing off Type 45.
The Indian Navy does not need any AAW ships, the planned capability in the 7 kolkata+15-b(probably another city-class) is what they plan till 2020 (barring any changes in the IOR climate).
Might as well try an sell the Carrier (chances of buying would be the same).
The ddg 1000 can provide a good AAW capability, it has the sensors, the weapons and the systems to preform that role, along with the guns and missiles to have a good land attack capability, the project in itself had/has a number of innovations that add to the current technology.
However i think now the program is being limited to 3 ships or so and the more Burke class III will be inducted instead of more DDG 1000.
So the any comparison should be between the new Burke class (Flight III?) and the Type-45. Which shouldn’t matter, as both ships serve different naval forces with different requirements.
The DDG 51 could add a new superstructure, evolved BMD capability, and if they like increase the size to accommodate a bigger new active radar, new systems and more VLS, it will however not be what the RN requires for its future, same goes for the USN w.r.t the T-45.
Another bid wrested by the Americans over the Europeans using political games…the Indian govt used “life cycle” costs to show that the GE engine is cheaper. I am guessing the EJ-200 was per unit cheaper.
Baring a major surprise the MRCA will be the Hornet..
The government can not do that.
Once you call for a price bid, you have to include all the factors for the decision, and once you take a decision on the price bid (when all participants meet the technical bid), you make your decision very easy to analyse (price A is lower than price B).
Once you open the bids up, they can be reviewed in a legal proceeding (if required, lets say Eurojet files a case).
No government or DRDO will manipulate the contract, when they could have straight away gone for the engine.
Probably much cheaper than building new, & unlike USS Trenton, the minesweepers are relatively new, & in good condition.
USS KINGFISHER (MHC 56)
Commissioned: October 26, 1996
Decommissioned: December 1, 2007
USS Cormorant (MHC 57)
Commissioned: April 12, 1997
Decommissioned: December 1, 2007
http://www.navysite.de/ships/mhc56.htm
http://www.navysite.de/ships/mhc57.htm
A lot of ships with the Indian Navy were commissioned before these ships.
All the Pondicherry class minesweepers, for e.g.
These may be to fill in till the new MCMVs arrive
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3794043
Even if that is so, it doesn’t mean it will be a worldclass AAW ship (which I think the original discussion was about).
The Kolkata class is a generational development of IN designs, AAW that the Indian navy needs, and is cutting edge in that respect, with a 15-B follow up to the design (as the current one dates back to near 2000), an entire generation of ships displaying designs built to the Indian Navies requirements, instead of it being the other way around.
Kolkata (P15A) is a redesigned Delhi (P15, which is modelled after the Sovremenny concept), much in the same way the Talwar is a redesigned Krivak III. P-15B should probably be viewed more as a P17 relative to a Krivak III or P-17A relative to Talwar.
Of course, P-17A may well be a non-Indian product. From Bharat-Rakshak:
This means it is by no means a given it will be a development of the current P17.
P-15B is still shrouded in mystery, there is no way of telling how cutting edge it is or isn’t.
WTH
Not sure what point or points you are actually trying to make now.
P-15B same as P-15A with minimal possible changes.
P-17A designed and built in India with consulting utilized wherever required.
If there has been news about it, let’s see some references to sources that have proven reliable in the past. CGs that are about P15A are not cutting it.
which source have proven reliable in the past?
The Project 15A and B ships are nearly identical in all aspects. They use the hull form of Project 15 ships but feature a completely changed superstructure and enhanced sound and infrared signature suppression measures to appear smaller on enemy radar.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_QKkSf03VuFY/S60QNOHPKvI/AAAAAAAACXA/yA5tTupF2hk/s1600/DSC02248.JPG
Photo: INS Kolkata– Suman Sharma, Defexpo-2010
Kolkata class models and drawing over the last decade have changed their superstructure and work was done on heat, sound and radar emissions as the project progressed, more work will be done on the project, priority will be given to build time first and cost, its not that hard to see that, the navy needs these ships.
So?
“A Request for Information (RFI) was reportedly issued to about 12 international firms, mostly in Europe and Russia. By soliciting tenders from so many foreign firms, and insisting on improved stealth requirements, India is implicitly creating the option of having Project 17-A ships use a very different base design than the Project 17 Shivalik class frigates.”
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/india-issues-rfi-for-stealth-frigates-02866/… even if they were all to be build in India.
One argument put forward was that it would not be wise to manufacture the ship abroad as it incorporated advanced indigenously developed stealth features
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/navy-seals-45-000cr-deal-seven-warships/479132/2
The GRSE-DCNS-Vison comptech JV is expected to work with Directorate General of Naval Design for the design.
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/seven-new-stealth-frigates-to-be-built-in-india/365019/
Its another generation of naval design which includes institutions that designed the previous frigates and most of the people involved will be the same.
Kolkata (P15A) is a redesigned Delhi (P15, which is modelled after the Sovremenny concept), much in the same way the Talwar is a redesigned Krivak III. P-15B should probably be viewed more as a P17 relative to a Krivak III or P-17A relative to Talwar.
P-15B is still shrouded in mystery, there is no way of telling how cutting edge it is or isn’t.
There has been plenty of news about P-15B, nearly all suggests it is a follow on variant of P-15, will have the same propulsion, machinery systems, some weapon systems might be added/changed depending on their availability, the Israeli sensors, weapons and management systems will remain the same, their will be changes to the superstructure, much like their were changes made to the existing P-15A destroyers as new requirements were added (the design started out different).
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Images/P15a.jpg
http://i31.tinypic.com/23r41l.jpg
a completely new design will require the whole process to start again, and IN has issues with the build time and project costs.
Of course, P-17A may well be a non-Indian product. From Bharat-Rakshak:
“Project 17A (P17A) is the next generation of surface combatants, which form part of the ongoing Project 17 (P17) program of multi-role stealth frigates. A total of seven vessels is projected in this element of the program, with the Indian Navy having issued an RFI (Request for Information) in late 2006. The RFI has been issued to numerous European and Russian shipyards, with the plan involving the first vessel to be built in an international shipyard and the remaining six vessels to be constructed in India itself.”This means it is by no means a given it will be a development of the current P17.
Interestingly, also from Bharat-Rakshak:
“In March 2009, the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) which is the apex procurement body in the Indian Ministry of Defence (MoD) approved four vessels for construction at MDL. Production is slated to commence in 2010. No other details are available.”
Mod Edit: Please do not post substantial cut-and-pastes from external sources.
We have had complaints from other publishers about this practice.
A summary and a link is quite sufficient.
The design will be done in India, with consulting where ever it is required, that is the trend that can be followed back to the last few decades. All the institutions involved in defining, designing, and constructing the project will be the same ones that were involved with the Shivalik Class.
The construction will include new modular techniques and the navy wanted the first two to be built in shipyards with experience while the methods were absorbed into Indian shipyards, however now the Ministry of defence has decided that all of the ships will be built in India
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/seven-new-stealth-frigates-to-be-built-in-india/365019/
The Israeli Barak 8 and ER are still in the late developmental phase, the sensor and associated hardware software technology has a lot of work done through the generations, its not like this is the first project they are completing, and the program was selected after considering all available options.
The Kolkata class is a generational development of IN designs, AAW that the Indian navy needs, and is cutting edge in that respect, with a 15-B follow up to the design (as the current one dates back to near 2000), an entire generation of ships displaying designs built to the Indian Navies requirements, instead of it being the other way around. Of-course that also means utilising consulting where it is required, for example the work which will be done upon the Project-15B for signature management (sound, radar and infrared) will be worth good millions of pounds and the BAE with its experience can offer this consulting service.
I know what you are talking about, and i agree with it, India is a big defence market, and domestic orders are shrinking at an alarming rate, they need new customers and selling weapons to democratic India seems to be a very PC thing these days, as simple as that, a company trying to get some action in one of the worlds biggest market for weapons.
We have foreign companies flying Indian journalists to show them a new product, quite a common thing.
But your AAW example sucked big time, the Kolkata Class and the follow on project-15B are quite cutting edge, and there is a lot of room and money in critical components (engine, design, sensors etc. etc.) and consulting.
Mod Edit: Please do not post substantial cut-and-pastes from external sources.
We have had complaints from other publishers about this practice.
A summary and a link is quite sufficient.
http://www.brahmand.com/news/Indian-Navy-to-procure-17-Hawk-trainer-aircraft-from-HAL/4539/1/13.html
http://www.baesystems.com/Newsroom/SpeechesandPresentations/autoGen_11011184033.html
The military commanders left will take over and the state will become a military dictatorship instead of the whatever strange form of governance they have right now, the military will continue with the old repressive ways, however without a power hungry and mentally insane leader, their decisions will be better.
I think if the north falls their will be one Korea, some bonds run deeper than money.
The military commanders left will take over and the state will become a military dictatorship instead of the whatever strange form of governance they have right now, the military will continue with the old repressive ways, however without a power hungry and mentally insane leader, their decisions will be better.
I think if the north falls their will be one Korea, some bonds run deeper than money.
The original journalists article was regarding an invite to view a T45 launch. Now it may have escaped some Indian attentions, but, the IN has a gaping hole in its AAW capability.
Now, call me stupid if you wish, but, if we want to make wild speculations about Indian journalists brought over to view high-quality British defence products for sales purposes does it not make a great deal more sense that.
Kolkata Class- and follow up Project 15-B, no scope of a AAW destroyer for the next decade.