dark light

V1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 240 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: British Charter #732733
    V1
    Participant

    RE: British Charter

    It sounds like quite a dramatic saga with what happened to Oasis, I often wondered what happened to them. As for Spanair and their cramped aircraft, the worst I ever flew on was Britannia onboard a 757-204. If I remember rightly, the config was a maximum density layout of 228 passengers. I have read that the 757 can seat up to around 239, but I shudder to think what sitting in those conditions would be like. I myself am quite tall at 6ft 3inches, so I really suffer when flying charter.

    However, I have flown on a Continental B757 from Birmingham to Newark and that had a lot more room onboard, as you would expect from a scheduled carrier. I think the example I flew on had a layout for 159 passengers, far less than a charter configuration!!

    Regards,
    V1

    in reply to: British Midland #732739
    V1
    Participant

    RE: british midland

    Nobody really knows what their new name will be, but I have been told that it will be unveiled when they take delivery of their first A330. I think a 2001 delivery is scheduled, is it not?

    Regards,
    V1

    in reply to: British Charter #732742
    V1
    Participant

    RE: British Charter

    It will be a shame if Air Europa does go, but I’m not surprised by this. I’ve noticed that some of their aircraft are in full Iberia colours when they have arrived at Birmingham. As for Spanair, I reckon they will improve as time goes by. They have just taken delivery of their first A321 and will eventually replace those rather cramped MD-83’s they currently use. Am I right in saying that Scandinavian Airline System (SAS) has a stake in them?

    Regards,

    V1

    P.S. – Talking of Spanish holiday carriers, who can remember Oasis?

    in reply to: British Charter #732751
    V1
    Participant

    RE: British Charter

    British charter airlines, eh? I have flown with most of them from my local airport, which is Birmingham International.

    I have seen that many charter carriers come and go over the past twenty years, it is sometimes difficult to see who is still in business and who is not!!

    Do you remember Air Europe? This was a Gatwick based charter carrier who I flew several times with in the eighties and they were really quite a good charter carrier. They won several awards within the industry and had a good all round reputation. AE itself was doing very well by around 1989/90 and had many aircraft on order including Fokker 100s, Boeing 737s and Boeing 757s. AE was the launch customer for the RR Trent powered MD-11, which it was to use on it’s long haul routes. I read somewhere that by around 1995, AE would have had around 90 aircraft in its fleet. Most people thought the airline would be a potential world beater, as it was also starting up several succesful scheduled services from its Gatwick base.
    Imagine my dismay when the airline ceased operations in March 1991. I was totally surprised by this, I thought it was a joke when someone first told me about it. AE was doing very well up until the day it ceased to be, but its parent company, the International Leisure Group was not, it would seem. ILG owned the tour operator Intasun, which also folded. Interestingly enough, AE was the only customer for the Trent powered MD-11, and the latter never materised.

    My point here is that no matter how well a charter airline is doing, it is the actions and what happens to their owners which will ultimately decide their future. Take overs and mergers are very common within the charter industry too. Who remembers tour operator Horizon and their airline, Orion? Thomson took Horizon over and Orion was integrated into britannia airways. Flying Colours and Caledonian megered to form JMC as a result of their parents changing their business strategy. Losing the Flying Colours name was a big mistake.

    How long before we see such famous names as Britannia and Monarch disappear I wonder. It was not long ago when Airtours and First Choice (who own Air 2000) were in the press regarding a possible merger, though this never did happen.

    One final point, the service offered by charter airlines is quite good nowadays, but those darn seats in charter config are still way too cramped!!!

    regards,
    V1

    in reply to: Web #732754
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Web

    Emirates has a nice website, and Continental have a quite advanced online booking system. I’ve never booked flights online, but I have used my credit card over the internet to order things such as mobile phones and the security is usually very good, as long as the website belongs to a reputable company. Airlines such as Emirates will have the financial resources to make sure that they have a very secure website.

    Regards,
    V1

    in reply to: Continental-Newcastle to Newark #732877
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Continental-Newcastle to Newark

    Newcastle could do with a transatlantic link, and I reckon it should do well. Continental seem to looking at quite a few UK regional airports to fly from. Expect to see a flight from Newcastle operated by the B757.

    Regards,

    V1.

    in reply to: Canada to India….Direct #732881
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Canada to India….Direct

    Well, if CMM do start a service of this nature, then I’m sure they will use the A330-200’s they currently have in their fleet.
    I’ve heard rumours of this service floating around for quite some time now.

    If it is of any help, Turkmenistan plan to fly a four weekly service from Toronto to Ashgabad/Delhi via Birmingham (BHX). I have heard the B757 will be the aircraft type used on this service.

    Regards,
    V1

    in reply to: Air Transat Airbus query #732884
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Air Transat Airbus query

    Thanks very much for the info, it has been a great help.

    regards,
    V1

    in reply to: thanks for the 1.0 rating #732913
    V1
    Participant

    RE: thanks for the 1.0 rating

    Hi Brad,

    Try the following aviation links site, you may find what you are looking for, there are hundreds of aviation related sights listed…http://www.airnet.cwc.net/

    I hope this helps!

    V1

    in reply to: AIR 2000 IS CRAP! #733090
    V1
    Participant

    RE: AIR 2000 IS CRAP!

    I assume you’ve had a bad experience flying with Air 2000!! I’ve flown with them a couple of times and I reckon they are not as good as they used to be, they were very good in the late eighties and early nineties, but they have lost something in recent years.

    I still think Britannia is the best of the UK charter airlines.

    in reply to: Embraer, Avro, Bombardier and Dornier-Boring future? #733236
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Embraer, Avro, Bombardier and Dornier-Boring future?

    I don’t think this problem lies just with regional jets, but virtually all airliners.

    For example, the B757 and TU-204 look similar as do the Tristar and DC-10. The 777 just looks like a fatter 767 to me. This problem, if you want to call it that, is not just exclusive to aircraft, but other modes of transport such as saloon cars and trains.

    My main point is that all of the above have been designed in a conventional manner, a tried and tested method of design. It would cost a manufacturer a lot more money if they went down the road of designing something radical. Concorde anyone?

    in reply to: aeroplane smell #733238
    V1
    Participant

    RE: aeroplane smell

    I’ve been on quite a few 757’s (mainly British charter carriers) in my time and the majority had a very ‘sweet’ and damp smell, I think it may have been due to the air conditioning packs.

    I’ve flew on the 767 (Britannia -200ER) as well and that was the same sort of smell.

    The worst I’ve been on in terms of cabin smell was a Ryanair B737-204 flying Dublin to Birmingham, it smelt not too nice at all..

    in reply to: dangerous airlines #733259
    V1
    Participant

    RE: dangerous airlines

    I’m not sure how you came to your conclusions, but I would not be surprised if Aer Lingus was one of the safest. After all, it has a very small fleet compared to most other flag carriers, so the chances of one of their aircraft being involved in an incident are small when you compare it to a mega carrier with several hundred aircraft. I know Aer Lingus is also very good when it comes to maintaining their aircraft.

    As for Aeroflot, well before the break up of the USSR they had thousands of aircraft, so there would be more chance of their aircraft being involved in an incident of some nature. Plus, some of the aircraft still in use are getting a little long in the tooth….

    in reply to: Flight Simulations #733395
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Flight Simulations

    Airline Simulator 2 is an excellent package, but it retailed at £99.99. Rather expensive for most I would have thought, but such is the price you pay for software of such quality.

    in reply to: British Midland #733399
    V1
    Participant

    RE: british midland

    Looking at the replies to this post, several of you think EMA will make a better alternative for long haul services than say LHR or MAN. This is true, but I truly believe that if BM or any other airline introduce a transatlantic route, it would cease after 12 months. I just can’t see load factors being satisfactory.

    Not only this, but Birmingam International is now the designated Midlands gateway and it already has several long haul routes which have excellent load factors, eg, Chicago, Newark, Ashkabad and Karachi. BHX lies just under fifty miles from EMA. The latter airport does not handle enough passengers to warrant services of this nature. But, with air travel proving more popular as each year goes by, EMA could well have a daily transatlantic service just a few years from now.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 240 total)