dark light

V1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 240 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Monoply in Engines #723049
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Monoply in Engines

    Does anybody know what kind of engines the A380 will be powered by? This aircraft is vast and I can see it being powered by four Trent powerplants. I think the A340-600 is powered by the Trent isn’t it? If so, I bet that bird can climb like a rocket. I always thought that the earlier A340 variants were a bit underpowered.

    Am I right in saying that Boeing 757’s powered by the PW2040 have slightly more thrust than their RR counterparts? I thnk the P&W engines deliver around 41,000lbs of thrust compared to the RB211-535E4’s 40,000lbs. Saying that, both are very powerful for the size of the aircraft.

    in reply to: BEA-LINKS TO THE US? #723053
    V1
    Participant

    RE: BEA-LINKS TO THE US?

    Well, according to a Birmingham Airport related website, the link up is with British Regional. Perhaps this web site is wrong…..From what you say, it does sound like British European. I’ll be quite glad if it is, BEA is a superb airline. I’ll have a look into this and I’ll let you know within the next couple of days.

    Regards,
    V1

    in reply to: Monoply in Engines #723288
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Monoply in Engines

    I don’t know enough about aero engine design to say which is best, but all of the major players such as RR and GE build good, proven engines such as the RB211 and CFM56.

    I find that a carrier will order engines as a polictical move. BA always orders RR powered aircraft, I’d bet because the engines are build in Derby, England. OK, I know BA have many GE90 powered 777’s, but the latest batch of -200ER’s are powered by the Trent.

    Then, most US airlines will buy aircraft with GE engines. The United 747 fleet are all powered by US built engines, and most P&W powered 757’s are operated by the likes of Delta and Northwest. On the other side of the atlantic, you’ll find such aircraft types powered by RR engines. I’m not saying that all European operators of the 747 fly RR powered examples, I know Air France and Lufthansa don’t, but how many US 747 operators use RR powered examples?

    in reply to: BEA-LINKS TO THE US? #723301
    V1
    Participant

    RE: BEA-LINKS TO THE US?

    By BEA, do you mean British European Airways? It is actually British Regional which has the tie up with Delta. I’ve only just found out about this new alliance so I don’t know too many details.

    British Regional may be used to connect smaller regional airports with larger ones so they can feed the DL services. In fact, DL have now made it clear that they want to fly Birmingham – Atlanta daily from 2002. British Regional already have a notable prescence at BHX…Not as much as Manchester of course…

    in reply to: Monoply in Engines #723304
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Monoply in Engines

    Rolls Royce engines are usually better with regards to the amount of fuel they consume, they do tend to be very durable as well. The RB211-535E4 (which powers the 757 series) is a notable powerplant which can last for a very long time before an engine change is required.

    Emirates will announce a huge 60 aircraft order at the Paris Air show, comprising of 777’s and the A330-200. All are going to be powered by the RR Trent.

    I seriously doubt other aero engine makers are ahead of RR in terms of technology.

    in reply to: decent viewing areas #723750
    V1
    Participant

    RE: decent viewing areas

    Birmingham has some good areas for viewing, although the majority of these are around the perimeter fences, one notable area being near the long stay car park area.

    There is a viewing lounge inside the main terminal, but recent terminal expanstion has blocked most of the views, and it is behind glass so it was never that good from a photography point of view.

    in reply to: Hollydays #724012
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Hollydays

    In September I’m off to Crete, flying from Birmingham in a JMC 757. Next year I’m off to Lanzarote on, yep, you guessed it, a JMC 757. Such variety eh?

    in reply to: Business Jets — Your Favourites? #724017
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Business Jets — Your Favourites?

    Biz jets eh? I like the HS 125, despite it’s advancing years, it still looks good. The Global Express is another good one as well.

    Most Biz jets look very sleek and well designed. Anyone remember the Lockheed Jetstar? A classic.

    in reply to: boeing or airbus #724047
    V1
    Participant

    RE: boeing or airbus

    Airbus led the way for years with it’s fly-by-wire contols. The latest Boeing, the 777, is also fly-by-wire, so Boeing obviously saw the advantages it had to offer.

    I can gaurantee you that all future Boeing aircraft will have fly-by-wire too.

    Both companies manufactur bloody good aircraft in my opinion.

    in reply to: Hollydays #724052
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Hollydays

    Hey Paul, Manchester-Paris Cdg is operated by leased 737-500 aircraft. They are all in full BA Union flag colours and will be based at MAN until the first of the new Airbus fleet arrives. Hope this helps!

    in reply to: BA gets rid of it's tacky tails! #724057
    V1
    Participant

    RE: BA gets rid of it’s tacky tails!

    It wouldn’t surprise me if they do go for a totally new livery and identity, the new Australian cheif executive seems to be changing quite a few things already…

    in reply to: Boeing safety bias #724062
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Boeing safety bias

    You raise an interesting point here. With regards to the Boeing 737, Boeing issued checking guidelines to all operators of 737-100/200/300/400/500 models once it was concluded that the United and US Air disasters may have been due to a rudder malfunction. Modifications were then carried out on aircraft and so far the problem appears to be resolved. It is interesting to note that the latest generation, the -600/700/800 and 900 all have redesigned, larger, tail fins with different rudders…

    The Boeing 767 has been victim to pylon cracks more than once. The British Airways fleet has been checked over in the past because of these and were then rectified.
    The biggest issue with the 767 however, is that concerning the Lauda Air disaster in Thailand a few years ago. The General Electric engines went into involuntary reverse thrust and caused the aircraft to break up in mid air. There is still much mystery as to why this happened. There are a large number of GE powered 767’s operating worldwide and none have been grounded….

    Could you imagine what would happen to world air travel if certification was withdrawn for the 737, 747 and 767? It would be a disaster. This could be why none have gone the same way as Concorde.

    Airbus itself had problems in the early days of the A320, mainly due to pilots not being used to fly-by-wire and the aircraft’s sophisticated computer management systems. The recent loss of a Gulf Air machine is still under investigation, yet none of these aircraft have been grounded either.

    Concorde was grounded because it is a very high profile aircraft and most of the general public recognise the aircraft easily. Most people couldn’t tell you the difference between a 737 and an A320, they are bread and butter aircraft which are seen everywhere. Taking a dozen or so Concordes out of service does not have any effect on global airtravel at all. The likes of BA and Air France will use a spare 767 or 747 to cover the flights that Concorde flew. Not that it really flew that many…

    I am confident Concorde will return to the skies within the next twelve months, but due to the high profile of the machine, people will never forget Paris…

    in reply to: Flight Simulator #724411
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Flight Simulator

    The big differences with the versions of FS2000 is the amount of scenery you get. The pro version gives you more scenery to fly around in, and I think you get a couple more aircraft too.

    Airport 2000 vol 2 is a scenery add-on for flight sim which enhances several international airports with realistic scenery and also includes dynamic scenery, ie other aircraft can be seen landing, taxying and taking off. Be warned, this add-on requires a fast PC with a good graphics card as the detail is really intense.

    in reply to: How is Ryanair? #724414
    V1
    Participant

    RE: How is Ryanair?

    I’ve flown with Ryanair on the BHX-DUB route before. The staff are friendly enough and they do offer drinks on the flight, but that is all.

    If you fly on one of their 737-200’s, chances are it will be an ex Britannia airways example and the cabin will reflect this. The seats are the same and the drinks trolleys still have the Britannia logo on them.

    All in all, I would fly with them again no problem. There isn’t much to say really with regards to their service. If you know what to expect, you will not be dissapointed.

    Just make sure that you get on the plane as quickly as possible once the flight has been called, seat allocations don’t exist with Ryanair and if you want the pick of the seats, get in, sit down and don’t move! I made the mistake of boarding last on one flight and ended up on the back row. Not nice in a 737-200!

    in reply to: Ross_Gunn #724872
    V1
    Participant

    RE: Ross_Gunn

    As far as I know, our fake pilot is still banned. The message you refer to is dated 15/3/01, it is showing as a recent message because somebody has replied to the topic recently.

    All I can say is that ‘Captain’ Gunn has a very vivid imagination!

    Regards,
    V1

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 240 total)