Nice picture with 3 F 35B
The F35 don’t have a real IRST AFAIK, it just uses A2A modes EOTS, which is more similar to the A2A modes of some targeting pods.
Actually, no. It uses the Sniper hardware with a substantial software insertion from AAS 42.
________
Dental insurance dicussion
2. It’s hard to believe but that’s what it can do — 1.2M with one EFT and 6 a2a missiles.
I didn’t find anything official about this.
3. And that was my point.
And i agreed. I add the detail about the F 16 because any time the F 16 “supercruising” capability was mentioned, the word clean was present
________
Itunes Gift Cards
If that’s your intellectual limit, why even embarrass yourself by posting ?
Fanboysm aside, what’s so offensive in my post? Tha brazilian article said :
One of the major criticisms that earlier versions of Gripen received was related to its lower operating radius. Na nova vers?o, a Saab afirma que o raio de combate foi ampliado para 1300 Km, podendo a aeronave permanecer por at? 30 minutos na ?rea de patrulha, armado com quatro m?sseis BVR, dois WVR e um tanque de combust?vel central. The new version, Saab says that the combat radius has been expanded to 1300 km, the aircraft can stay for up to 30 minutes in the area of patrol, armed with four missiles BVR, WVR two and a central fuel tank. O alcance de translado chegar? aos 4 mil Km. The extent of transfer will reach 4000 km
So, one might suppose that the max combat radius (1300 km is ~ 712 Nmiles) is with 3 EFTs. So, yes, the NG could take off with 3 EFTs, fly 1300 km, drop 2 EFTs to increase the chances in a fight, and patrool with 1 EFT.
Satisfied?
________
LAMBORGHINI V8 HISTORY
Gripen has very low drag also in some non-clean configs; this is demonstrated by the information from Saab that one drop tank adds 1000 km to the range.
What type of tank? the new 450 gal or the old one?
I would think that in particular the one tank + 6 a2a missiles config has very low drag. This is consistent with the fact that NG can SC>1.2M in that config as well, even in spite of being powered by the relatively weak F414.
It’s hard to believe that it can do 1.2M with one EFT.
F-16 is said to also be able to SC, however I have (so far) not seen any claims that the F-16 would be able to SC>1.2M in such a config, in spite of having a stronger engine. Perhaps the explanation is that Gripen has less drag in that config than the F-16.
No one said that –the F 16 blk. 50-52 can do this but clean.
________
THE CIGAR BOSS
Or not. None of their radars can reliably track anything short of a tanker or AWACs at the max range of the “D”.
Except that a dozen or two F 15C had APG 63(V)2, the F 15 C of the Air Nationa Guard just started to receive APG 63(V)3. Not to mention the ~ 150 F 18E/F that already got their APG 79…
________
Anal Pregnant
It’s with one tank:
Yeah, sure :p maybe go in with 3 EFTs, drops 2EFTs, stays on station with 1 EFT… more plausible.
________
Uggs
GPS Based INS
Improved HOBS Ability
2-way datalink
Improved Networking
3rd Party Targeting
You forget the main improvement: a new radar in the nose. Up to the last C version, the radar was the initial in the A (IOC in 1992), of course improved with each version; this time is a brand new one…
________
HOW TO ROLL A BLUNT
You named it. They work OK when they’re used the way they were designed to be used. That means against reasonably concentrated vehicle groups/ columns. Unfortunately for you, this is exactly what you rarely get to see in asymmetrical combat. Therefore I agree with djcross, a cold war relic.
The idea is that tanks/APCs stay grouped, otherways there are dead meat. And about asymetrical combat, many people believe that all future conflicts will be against Talibans or similar. Not to mention that modern ammo (JDAM) + Special forces did work pretty well in 2001 in A-stan.
And you are right, many weapons available today are cold war relics. They combine destructive power often thousands times greater than needed with target detection/recognition capabilities far below requirements. Your forces are perfectly capable to destroy pretty much anything. The problem is, they just don’t know what to destroy.
Well, at least the SFW did know what to destroy. As well as JDAMs/LGBs with targeting pods.
________
The cigar boss
However, SFW use in Iraq 2003 appears to be a failure because the Iraqis were dispersed, revetted and didn’t have engines running for the SFW’s IR sensors to detect. Reports make me believe their effectiveness was poor.
Really? Two SFWs destroyed 30 vehicles (including T 72s) form 100, and the crews from the other 70 surrender immediatelly. That’s a failure for you?
Today, many nations employ sophisticated camouflage netting that masks signatures that used to be detectable by IR, radar or laser.
How many nations?
________
Tube *******
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/f414.htm
read about step C..
Future potential, yes, but for now, the EPE is ground-tested at 26,000.
________
Montana Marijuana Dispensaries
i thought EPE was potential for even 29000lbs?!
No, it’s 26,000 lbs. EPE is an EDE with a different low pressure compressor.
________
Ebony Cam
An old one, but I’d like to to see this one realised.:)
Just one litle remark: the 26.000 F 414 is EPE (enhanced performance engine). The D in EDE is from durability, and this variant has the same thrust asthe vanilla F 414.
But I agree, a Gripen with a 26.000 lbs engine would be a beast.
________
VAPORIZER – HERBALAIRE
Hipotetically speaking (because 1) US wouldn’t allow Turkey to play with fire and 2) Turkish military wouldn’t hapilly follow politicians into a war with Israel), Israel clearly has the upperhand:
– the two AFs are only in theory equal. The 101 F16I and 25 F15I have no pairs inside TuAF. Only recently Turkey contracted LM to MLU its newest F 16s.
– Israeli pilots more accustomed with long range missions;
– EW- no match here. One look to the oversized jammers and enlarged spines of the two-seater Vipers (the Israeli introduced this feature) is enough to figure the outcome;
– AEWC, networks, mission planning, training, guess who’s got the edge?
________
Honda cbf500 history
Which of course is the far-out ‘estimated’ avg price and one based on 2,440 total US buys. So, “…the 125 mil is the estimated program unit cost…”, one which is unable to be banked on and one unfortunately based on unrealistic procurement wishes.
Thus, we will very unfortunately not see close to 2,400+ US F-35s being procured, nor an avg program unit Cost anywhere as low as $125m.
A misconception still and official major miscalculation regarding assumed tacair recapitalization and air combat command planning. ‘Staying the course’ will produce unintended consequences with significant ramifications, by default. (Regardless of how good an actual technical capability will be in an eventual, Fully Operational Capable block V F-35 model, by early 20s).
Whatever the final program unit cost of F 35 will be, the point is that in order to compare apples to apples you should double the “30 mil”-“55 mil” price of the F 18 C/E.
________
WELLBUTRIN CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT