dark light

dynamo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 250 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2398109
    dynamo
    Participant

    Nice picture with 3 F 35B

    in reply to: IRST worthless? #2407796
    dynamo
    Participant

    The F35 don’t have a real IRST AFAIK, it just uses A2A modes EOTS, which is more similar to the A2A modes of some targeting pods.

    Actually, no. It uses the Sniper hardware with a substantial software insertion from AAS 42.
    ________
    Dental insurance dicussion

    in reply to: Modern fighters combat radius; #2407956
    dynamo
    Participant

    2. It’s hard to believe but that’s what it can do — 1.2M with one EFT and 6 a2a missiles.

    I didn’t find anything official about this.

    3. And that was my point.

    And i agreed. I add the detail about the F 16 because any time the F 16 “supercruising” capability was mentioned, the word clean was present
    ________
    Itunes Gift Cards

    in reply to: Modern fighters combat radius; #2407958
    dynamo
    Participant

    If that’s your intellectual limit, why even embarrass yourself by posting ?

    Fanboysm aside, what’s so offensive in my post? Tha brazilian article said :

    One of the major criticisms that earlier versions of Gripen received was related to its lower operating radius. Na nova vers?o, a Saab afirma que o raio de combate foi ampliado para 1300 Km, podendo a aeronave permanecer por at? 30 minutos na ?rea de patrulha, armado com quatro m?sseis BVR, dois WVR e um tanque de combust?vel central. The new version, Saab says that the combat radius has been expanded to 1300 km, the aircraft can stay for up to 30 minutes in the area of patrol, armed with four missiles BVR, WVR two and a central fuel tank. O alcance de translado chegar? aos 4 mil Km. The extent of transfer will reach 4000 km

    So, one might suppose that the max combat radius (1300 km is ~ 712 Nmiles) is with 3 EFTs. So, yes, the NG could take off with 3 EFTs, fly 1300 km, drop 2 EFTs to increase the chances in a fight, and patrool with 1 EFT.

    Satisfied?
    ________
    LAMBORGHINI V8 HISTORY

    in reply to: Modern fighters combat radius; #2407984
    dynamo
    Participant

    Gripen has very low drag also in some non-clean configs; this is demonstrated by the information from Saab that one drop tank adds 1000 km to the range.

    What type of tank? the new 450 gal or the old one?

    I would think that in particular the one tank + 6 a2a missiles config has very low drag. This is consistent with the fact that NG can SC>1.2M in that config as well, even in spite of being powered by the relatively weak F414.

    It’s hard to believe that it can do 1.2M with one EFT.

    F-16 is said to also be able to SC, however I have (so far) not seen any claims that the F-16 would be able to SC>1.2M in such a config, in spite of having a stronger engine. Perhaps the explanation is that Gripen has less drag in that config than the F-16.

    No one said that –the F 16 blk. 50-52 can do this but clean.
    ________
    THE CIGAR BOSS

    in reply to: Comparison F 15 E- SU 34 Fullback! #2408822
    dynamo
    Participant

    Or not. None of their radars can reliably track anything short of a tanker or AWACs at the max range of the “D”.

    Except that a dozen or two F 15C had APG 63(V)2, the F 15 C of the Air Nationa Guard just started to receive APG 63(V)3. Not to mention the ~ 150 F 18E/F that already got their APG 79…
    ________
    Anal Pregnant

    in reply to: Modern fighters combat radius; #2408823
    dynamo
    Participant
    in reply to: Comparison F 15 E- SU 34 Fullback! #2408930
    dynamo
    Participant

    GPS Based INS
    Improved HOBS Ability
    2-way datalink
    Improved Networking
    3rd Party Targeting

    You forget the main improvement: a new radar in the nose. Up to the last C version, the radar was the initial in the A (IOC in 1992), of course improved with each version; this time is a brand new one…
    ________
    HOW TO ROLL A BLUNT

    in reply to: The Sensor Fused Weapon #1803487
    dynamo
    Participant

    You named it. They work OK when they’re used the way they were designed to be used. That means against reasonably concentrated vehicle groups/ columns. Unfortunately for you, this is exactly what you rarely get to see in asymmetrical combat. Therefore I agree with djcross, a cold war relic.

    The idea is that tanks/APCs stay grouped, otherways there are dead meat. And about asymetrical combat, many people believe that all future conflicts will be against Talibans or similar. Not to mention that modern ammo (JDAM) + Special forces did work pretty well in 2001 in A-stan.

    And you are right, many weapons available today are cold war relics. They combine destructive power often thousands times greater than needed with target detection/recognition capabilities far below requirements. Your forces are perfectly capable to destroy pretty much anything. The problem is, they just don’t know what to destroy.

    Well, at least the SFW did know what to destroy. As well as JDAMs/LGBs with targeting pods.
    ________
    The cigar boss

    in reply to: The Sensor Fused Weapon #1803488
    dynamo
    Participant

    However, SFW use in Iraq 2003 appears to be a failure because the Iraqis were dispersed, revetted and didn’t have engines running for the SFW’s IR sensors to detect. Reports make me believe their effectiveness was poor.

    Really? Two SFWs destroyed 30 vehicles (including T 72s) form 100, and the crews from the other 70 surrender immediatelly. That’s a failure for you?

    Today, many nations employ sophisticated camouflage netting that masks signatures that used to be detectable by IR, radar or laser.

    How many nations?
    ________
    Tube *******

    in reply to: Fantasy fighters #2378259
    dynamo
    Participant

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/f414.htm

    read about step C..

    Future potential, yes, but for now, the EPE is ground-tested at 26,000.
    ________
    Montana Marijuana Dispensaries

    in reply to: Fantasy fighters #2378859
    dynamo
    Participant

    i thought EPE was potential for even 29000lbs?!

    No, it’s 26,000 lbs. EPE is an EDE with a different low pressure compressor.
    ________
    Ebony Cam

    in reply to: Fantasy fighters #2379470
    dynamo
    Participant

    An old one, but I’d like to to see this one realised.:)

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v486/robban75/Gripen1XMLU.jpg

    Just one litle remark: the 26.000 F 414 is EPE (enhanced performance engine). The D in EDE is from durability, and this variant has the same thrust asthe vanilla F 414.

    But I agree, a Gripen with a 26.000 lbs engine would be a beast.
    ________
    VAPORIZER – HERBALAIRE

    in reply to: Turkey vs Israel #2379478
    dynamo
    Participant

    Hipotetically speaking (because 1) US wouldn’t allow Turkey to play with fire and 2) Turkish military wouldn’t hapilly follow politicians into a war with Israel), Israel clearly has the upperhand:
    – the two AFs are only in theory equal. The 101 F16I and 25 F15I have no pairs inside TuAF. Only recently Turkey contracted LM to MLU its newest F 16s.
    – Israeli pilots more accustomed with long range missions;
    – EW- no match here. One look to the oversized jammers and enlarged spines of the two-seater Vipers (the Israeli introduced this feature) is enough to figure the outcome;
    – AEWC, networks, mission planning, training, guess who’s got the edge?
    ________
    Honda cbf500 history

    in reply to: New F-35 News thread #2381542
    dynamo
    Participant

    Which of course is the far-out ‘estimated’ avg price and one based on 2,440 total US buys. So, “…the 125 mil is the estimated program unit cost…”, one which is unable to be banked on and one unfortunately based on unrealistic procurement wishes.

    Thus, we will very unfortunately not see close to 2,400+ US F-35s being procured, nor an avg program unit Cost anywhere as low as $125m.

    A misconception still and official major miscalculation regarding assumed tacair recapitalization and air combat command planning. ‘Staying the course’ will produce unintended consequences with significant ramifications, by default. (Regardless of how good an actual technical capability will be in an eventual, Fully Operational Capable block V F-35 model, by early 20s).

    Whatever the final program unit cost of F 35 will be, the point is that in order to compare apples to apples you should double the “30 mil”-“55 mil” price of the F 18 C/E.
    ________
    WELLBUTRIN CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 250 total)