dark light

dynamo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 250 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New F-35 News thread #2381592
    dynamo
    Participant

    – About the numbers:

    – I would expect that a 125m aircraft would exceed the performance of a 30m F/A-18C or a 55m -E/F, and it will. But is it worth the cost for the modest increase in performance that the F-35C offers vs. the F/A-18E/F on the 2nd and subsequent days of war? Would it be more cost effective to buy just enough F-35C’s to fill a few squadrons to use on the initial strikes?

    The 30 mil. for F 18C and the 55 mil. for the F 18 E are the flyaway prices while the 125 mil is the program unit cost that includes infrastructure, spares, service, R&D.
    ________
    LovelyWendie

    in reply to: Typhoon VS F-22 VS Rafale part II #2392461
    dynamo
    Participant

    Oh, come on.. Charlie Eagle is able to fly over M1.9 with four AAMs and two 2039lb Mk84.

    Sure, it is. But only without EFTs. Do you have any idea what would be the combat radius at 1.9M? Some 100 Nmiles…
    ________
    Honda cb series history

    in reply to: Typhoon VS F-22 VS Rafale part II #2393383
    dynamo
    Participant

    I think you forgot MiG-31 etc in the rush.

    I have to agree with you with the MiG 31. However, the F 15 is no match for the F 15 in speed in real conditions.

    Btw has anyone seen, heard, or read of an F-22 going M1.85+ last 1 1/2 year ?

    Has anyone seen/heard/read of another plane going as fast as the F22 in the last 1 1/2 year ? :diablo:
    ________
    Class action settlement

    in reply to: New F-35 News thread #2393402
    dynamo
    Participant

    One bit of fallout from the matter of ?l?affaire Sweetman? is that all of us who write about aerospace matters, whether as amateurs or professionals, must form our own individual conclusions as to how happy we are to write if there are limits to the views that we can express.

    Censorship ? whatever the pretext for its application ? is not pleasant, and sometimes the only solution is to ?vote with one?s feet?. And Aviation Week has just reminded me that it?s time to renew my subscription.

    For aerospace professionals, whether engineers, journalists or whatever, ?l?affaire Sweetman? is also a reminder that our employers or clients would probably be less than happy about informal views we post online. Lurking rather than posting may be wise move.

    Do you consider this :

    “Gentlemen, your target for tonight is Fort Worth. Flacks are predicted to be numerous and persistent on the run-in and over the target, and bull**** is expected to be dense throughout the mission. Synchronize watches and good luck.”

    a piece of un-biased, professional journalism?
    ________
    LovelyWendie

    in reply to: Typhoon VS F-22 VS Rafale part II #2393435
    dynamo
    Participant

    Originally Posted by MSphere
    Unfortunately, the F-22 isn’t by far the fastest aircraft USAF has. If you already have a situation where you REALLY NEED to take out some very important target very fast, then launching an F-15 roaring at full speed with AB on brings you comparable/better results than doing the same with F-22.

    The f 22 is the fastes plane, not only in USAF, but in the world, if we are talking about combat loaded fighters. Clean fighters, yes there are some that theoretically will go > 2M. But not in a real combat situation. And BTW, do you have any idea what’s the combat radius with of a F 15 without EFTs?
    ________
    BEST PORTABLE VAPORIZER ON THE MARKET

    in reply to: Typhoon VS F-22 VS Rafale part II #2393437
    dynamo
    Participant

    There is a diamond shaped radome on each upper wing root just aft of the leading edge flap. Anybody want to guess what’s under those radomes? 😉

    I don’t think that it houses a IRTS-like device. IIRC, the planned AIRST was supoosed to be under the nose not unlike the F 35 EOTS. The radome you mention could cover some EW stuff.
    ________
    Kitchen Measures

    in reply to: Typhoon VS F-22 VS Rafale part II #2394994
    dynamo
    Participant

    So the bottomline continues to remain that someone from active Adla service has said what he has said, and not yet retracted his words. To me, the credibility of Mr. Grandclaudon’s statements increases since nobody worth their name has come out publicly to deny what the gent said.

    USS.

    On the contrary:
    -a squadron leader from Langley AFB said the Raptor beat every fighter encountered;
    -guys from RAF and Eurofighter consortium denied the 7:1 score;
    -the french Air & Cosmos magazine described a totally differnt story about the F 22 vs. Rafale. A rather sad one for Rafale…
    ________
    LSD REHAB FORUM

    in reply to: Typhoon VS F-22 VS Rafale part II #2397114
    dynamo
    Participant

    Me ? who cares , only stupid French and UAE pilots who were in ATLC believe it 😉

    Yeah, one must be really stupid to beleive this s**t.

    btw about the F16’s, despite a more detailed article now :D, it seems you’re still missing the point … when doing SEAD: basic Rafale > F16CJ ; basic Rafale = F16CJ with HTS pod…(at least ?)

    No, you ‘re still missing it. I’m not talking about this thread. In the initial one there is no mention about the fact that F 16 didn’t carry the HTS. It was implied that F 16 CJ wasn’ t able to do what a Rafale can. Or, athe fact is that an F 16 (block 40, 42, 50, 52) is a CJ is only when it carry the HTS. A HTS-less F 16 is no CJ.

    BTW, the reason that USAF choose to buy pods instead a an internal system is cost: there are some 200 pods for ~ 650 F 16 40/42/50/52.
    ________
    NO2 VAPORIZER

    in reply to: Typhoon VS F-22 VS Rafale part II #2397194
    dynamo
    Participant

    lol, perhaps you should start by reading the whole article, nobody else can do that for you… 😎

    Except that in the first articles about this exercise, the french sources “forget” to mention that.

    BTW, when doing SEAD, F 16 CJ always carry the (small) HTS pod…

    … And about the f-22 vs m2000-9, you’ll be happy to learn that a special patch was created by the Air Force to celebrate the event 😉

    If you believe that…:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p:p
    ________
    Panties

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2398673
    dynamo
    Participant

    The real kill ratio of the F-22A is zero and even the artificial claims are never *:0
    for many reasons. 😎

    In USAF F 15 was used in anger 15 years from it’s IOC. The fact that now the real kill ratio is zero, doesn’t mean that it won’t be a top fighter.

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2398676
    dynamo
    Participant

    djcross :

    djcross , this is where many people from various countries say “”stop the bull…t .
    It is claims and nothing else . The toolsets and analysis to develop the F-22 are telling LM that the F-35 is a dog :diablo:

    This toolset, called TAC Brawler simulation was used in predicting the perfomances of fighters such F 15, F 16 and F 22. The simulations concluded that those will be stellar performers. Guess what? They were right…:diablo: And no, those simulations weren’t perfromed LM, but by USAF.

    Of course , as far as I am concerned , Europe Carriers (UK , Spain , Germany , Italy) should have gone with the Rafale (or Trafale) .
    By trying to sink the European aircraft industry and making big money , LM only wrecked the entire US future fleet by giving them … a dog

    Since when Germany operate carriers? This gem alone says a lot about your knowledge…

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2399858
    dynamo
    Participant

    pfcem , there is one thing you must understand once for all (this is also aimed at other posters) .

    The F-35 is a brick with engine powerful enough to keep it airborne .
    It can ‘t even do a proper roll without loosing altitude .

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/jan-june10/defense_04-21.html
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4df9k_f35-lightning-ii_tech

    I can find many other videos showing the same behavior .
    Then , people (like Beesley) are telling me that it can match a F-16 !?? 😮
    They should go easy with the Jack Daniel ‘s No7 :diablo:

    Cheers .

    Do you realize that those videos show the X 35, not the F 35 ?

    Not only the F 35 will outaccelerate and outmaneuver the F 16 but also the Rafale, the Gripen and the EF…

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2401476
    dynamo
    Participant

    jackjack :

    No . The F119 ‘s cool air bypassing chamber surrounds the whole length of the engine , the F135 doesn ‘t exhibit the same design . Then , the F119 ‘s nozzle is made to mix the cool air with the hot gases from the exhaust .
    Look carefully at the drawings :

    F119 :
    http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/5166/f119cutawayhigh.jpg

    F135 :
    [IMG]http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/7198/f135ctolcutawaylow.jpg%5B/IMGhttp…]

    Cheers .

    http://www.pw.utc.com/Products/Military/F135Look at the two rows of nozzles. Wonder what flows bewteen them…:D

    in reply to: Assesment of b-2 signature levels #2407861
    dynamo
    Participant

    IIT BOMBAY…:diablo:
    ________
    WEED VAPORIZER

    dynamo
    Participant

    Since the first APG 63(V)3 has recently been delivered to 125 FW (Florida ANG) it is worth to compare its antena with the APG 77.

    It seems that the 63′ it’s much bigger.
    ________
    WASHINGTON DISPENSARIES

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 250 total)