dark light

Vetinari

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 91 through 100 (of 100 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode III #2471642
    Vetinari
    Participant

    We can also hope that someone might make a mistake and reveal accidentally a thing or two – in the same way that Krilov revealed the 885’s hull.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode III #2471657
    Vetinari
    Participant

    http://www.rutv.ru/tvp.html?id=140318&cid=2&d=0

    This is going to be a report about the PAK-FA development. There will be interviews with the pilots who are going to test the airplane and probably with someone from Sukhoi. If we are lucky, there might be a 3D model or at least a new artist’s concept. I doubt that the entire program will be without any visual material about the airplane 🙂

    in reply to: Gripen jamming trials #2531415
    Vetinari
    Participant

    Two in fact. Slovakia also has the S-300.

    I would rather say three – Bulgaria also has one S-300 battalion.

    in reply to: Russian Ch-101 cruise missile revealed #1792451
    Vetinari
    Participant

    In one of the suggested modernizations it was said that Tu-22M3s would have the ability to carry 2-3 X-101/102 and an improved X-22. Yet, I have no idea if the current program includes such plans :confused:

    in reply to: Navy news from around the world, news & discussion #2046274
    Vetinari
    Participant

    Add to the Belgian ships the Smeli (‘Koni’ class/Type 1159) light patrol frigate and you have a four frigate navy. Considering all these ships are late 1970s vintage, they have not more than 10 years service left. If the Bulgars order new ships now, today, it will be at least a couple of years before the first is launched and commissioned. So, my perception is that Bulgaria will take the Belgian ships (three) in the interim, expanding the number of major surface combattants to four, and then pay all four light frigates off as four new ships become available.

    I don’t think that we need four antiquated frigates – they would be only a waste of money. The Wielingen frigate doesn’t present any significant improvement – they are old, and only the Exocet missiles offer anything better than the 1159. Yet, the Exocets are the first model, which is rather obsolete. And there is only one Exocet missile in the frigate, and we don’t have any other. As you can see, the logistics aren’t the best, and the old ship itself would require intensive maintenance. So buying 3 obsolete ships (25-35 million euro) and then buying ammunitions, spares, and so on would come at some 200 million. On the other hand, a Gowind would have the same price, while having the firepower of the 3 frigates. Right now the best solution would be to maintain the current fleet (1 1159, 1 Belgian frigate, 1 Molniya, 2 1124s, 3 Osa I, and 3 Osa II) until the four new corvettes come to service. The financial resource is not unlimited, so any Belgian frigates could hamper the buying of the Gowinds.

    As for type 22/23 – they are more powerful, but having 3 different types of frigates is rather pointless. Also, as I mentioned, we need money for the Gowinds 🙁

    in reply to: Navy news from around the world, news & discussion #2046445
    Vetinari
    Participant

    How does this relate to the rumours about the acquirement of the 2 remaining Wielingen-class frigates from the RBN??? Do they have enough budget for both programmes? Or do the Belgians have to look for new buyers?

    Currently, Bulgaria has one Wielingn frigate, there are plans for the aquisition of one more. So the proposed future fleet would be of 2 Wielingens and 4 Gowinds (not sure if they would be 200 or what would be the exact weapon suit).

    in reply to: Trip Report – MAKS, Samara & Saratov #2515563
    Vetinari
    Participant

    Sean, I’m not Russian, but the text goes something like this:

    Forgive us Belorussian land,
    Not we separated you from Russia
    We like Russia (no idea what beregly means) you
    And like we love Russia we love you too!

    in reply to: A modern CTOL carrier under 30,000 tons? #2049186
    Vetinari
    Participant

    Just a thought. Instead of Hawk 120, why not try a naval modification of Yak-130? At least their site says that this could be done with just 5% change to the airframe. You could put inside a reasonable radar, and the load of the airplane is not small at all – it could have its teeth, even possibly BVR weapon as R-77…
    http://www.yak.ru/PROD/new_130_mod.php

    in reply to: PLA (All Forces) Missiles #1794820
    Vetinari
    Participant

    I agree with all the dificulties outlined about AShBM, but I do not think that finding the aircraft carrier would be such a great difficulty. The Russians had tried all of the methods mentioned above – triangulation of radio emissions, RORSATs, and Tu-142s… Yet, the most effective method turned out to be simple fishing boats with GRU members onboard 😉
    As a Russian anecdote goes, “…Вот уже которые сутки агрессивный американский авианосец идет тем же курсом и точно повторяет все маневры мирного советского траулера…”
    http://forums.airbase.ru/2007/08/13/topic-31470–Razvedyvatel’nye-korab…
    As the Chinese coast is filled with boats and ships of all sizes, this is a completely working method (although possibly suisidal in case of war).

    in reply to: Three questions about radars #2517083
    Vetinari
    Participant

    3. About MiG-21, some more “recent” batches could carry R-60 missiles. Does the FCS allow firing those missiles without previous radar lock? Eg. to slave the missile seeker to the HUD piper, much like in Su-25, it also uses Aphids for self-defense and has no radar or any kind of aerial sensor.

    Zare, as for the MiG-21bis, they have this capability for sure. During an excersice between the Bulgarian AF and the RAF, our MiG-21s had to intercept Jaguars flying at about 50 meters above the ground. Needless to say, the radar was of no use when searching for these targets. The only thing that would happen if the radar is switched on is that the Jaguars would be alerted that the MiG is nearby. So almost all of the time our planes had to make lock-ons without using the radar (I believe that the simulated missile was R-60).

    sferrin, as for the device detecting optics – there was a russian documentary, and in one brief period they showed a device that was capable of detecting a rifle’s optics. The device looked somewhat like a binoculars, and when the optic was seen, it was a bright spot on a rather grey background. They said that it would be used in the future to prevent ambushes and guard VIPs.

Viewing 10 posts - 91 through 100 (of 100 total)