The Mannequin challenge is just a response when their staged game of rescue was caught on the camera and got leaked

They might well say the many other acts of rescue were Mannequin challenge and not real rescue.

It feels like none of you have Internet or Google or YouTube or Facebook or any sort of social media or search engine.

Go on YouTube and search “Mannequin challenge” just watch any of them video, then come back and watch the white helmet video. Then tell me they are not trying to replicate the challenge. Why do you think they have to keep stationary when the camera moving around? if they wanted to fake a battlefield rescue video then there would be no point to do that.And they wouldn’t upload a video like that either. No doubt that this thread is full of members that don’t like American but this is just borderline retarded. So desperate to find an “evidence” that fit your narrative that you ignore common sense.

My point was if there was either a Wedgetail E-7A, as an airborne command centre it would have a full view of the attack and what was happening; or, if there was a Reaper (UK or otherwise), it would also have had a bird’s eye view of what was happening in the attack which it would be live streaming on a video link and that the attackers would have known it was Syrian Government troops on the heights they were attacking (and where the Syrians had been for years), while the ISIS/”moderate” terrorist forces concentrated and waiting to attack below would also have been picked up over the duration of the attack (about an hour).

If only identify friend and foe could be that simple , we would never have friendly fire. But target on screen look more like this

There was even an incident that an AH-64 friendly fire on their own troop. And that thing has FLIR

knots or IAS.. it doesn’t matter much

knots = 1.852 km/h
IAS = indicated air speed which change dramatically with altitude even if aircraft moving at the same speed

And IAS can either be in knots or mph
In other words , it matter alot

Next stupid thread will perhaps be the F-35 out leg the Flanker or something along those lines..

And why would that be stupid ? the yet have more fuel fraction and quite efficient engine. It entirely possible that it could out range the Flanker

Very clever , now you purposely change my words to make it ridiculous. Nice try but too bad for you no one here is dumb enough to fell for that trickery

Stop responding to JSR, he is a troll with no argument or knowledge. Keep going and his only argument would be “domestic version is different” and “Russian are very technology advanced”

May be adding DI of central pylon too?. One thing that been bugging me though, why the heck HAF manual not have DI for CFT? their F-16 carry that tumor thinggy all the time

According to this http://defense-update.com/products/c/F-16-CFT.htm

“A set of CFTs carries 50 percent more fuel than the centerline external fuel tank, but has only 12 percent of the drag.” The CFTs are designed for the full F-16 flight envelope – up to 9 g’s, maximum angle of attack and sideslip and maximum roll rate.

Centerline tank has drag index of 18 when fully loaded , centerline pylon has drag index of 7

So 12*( 18+7)/100 =3 even less drag than a single Aim-120

Says another nationalistic troll :angel:

When and how am i a troll ? , are you just mad because i disagree with your Rafale obsession.And if iam a troll then what does that make you ?