Reporter-What about modern radar technology and IR signatures?
Chief of staff- Solution is off board jamming from our partners if needed,

F-35 can jam enemy radar either by APG-81 or ALE-70 or ASQ-239 or MALD-J
http://www.baesystems.com/en/product/an-asq-239-f-35-ew-countermeasure-system
http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/mald/

IR signature and AESA S-UHF band is a hype

1) F-35 have Infrared reduction measuare as well
https://basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/2016/03/04/stealth-techniques-and-benefits/
2) low frequency radar arenot magic , eventhough all AWACS use low frequency ESA radar they still need to be positioned in certain direction to detect the aircraft
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/eurofighter-boasts-typhoon-reign-over-f-35-345265/

Reporter-What about speed, supercruise, acceleration and turn rates?
Chief of staff-Well we have decent nose pointing ability and fly really well with a 2 ton load out and 2 aams, and no need to disengage since we always have the upper hand

F-35 with internal load accelerated at similar rate as a Su-27 aimed with 4 R-73 , i wouldnt call that slow to be honest , it’s sustain G is around similar to a F-16 with drag index 50

That statement alone disqualifies you from further debate..

So a accurate statement disqualifies me from debate ? nice to know that

Please, return to your posting of myriad of useless equations concerning the F-35, instead.

Useless ? , i dont think so , you just mad when iam posting equation because you cant argue again physics

could not care less..
look at the KnAAZ prod. line pics, compare with old Su-27…

since you want to troll so much , here is the picture of them side by side

material wise these airframes are not identical, not even similar..

outer airframe material of 2 aircraft is the same whether you like it or not

can’t see it nowhere

It right infront of your face , come back and look at the graph , on the left is su-27 without RAM , on the right is su-27 with RAM on engine fan blades , pylon , and airframe

Why should I? It’s not the same aircraft.. I rather wait until RCS diagram o the Su-35S is posted.

it is the different version of the same aircraft , with change in the radar , ecm and engine just like the different between F-16C and F-16E

This graphics has no face value. And it’s an Su-27, not Su-35…

If you have better graph then post it or atleast the reason why the graph isnt good , and because Su-27 and Su-35 have same shape and similar material , with RAM paint on they will be have similar RCS. (an example of similar relationship is between f-16C and F-16E )

big aircraft = true…
big RCS = baseless assumption

two more points are stealth design and combat role
the F-35 needs to be stealthy, and was designed mainly for ground attack

F-35 was designed as a multirole fighter , similar to f-16 , f-18 , su-35 ..etc and almost everything flying these day

meaning its EO IR sensors will be limited by the stealth design, and specialised in ground detection

This a baseless assumption , EOTS range performance surpassed OLS-35 significantly

the Su-35 on the other hand has a big EO IR sensor sitting on its nose that’s probably specialised in air combat

The position of the IR sensor doesnt say much about what is it optimized again
i know people think : EOTS is under the nose => at a close enough distance it cant see target flying higher than F-35 => not optimized to AA role .
but
lf F-35 EOTS is under the nose mean it cant see target flying higher than it , then using the same logic FSO , PIRATE , OLS-35 cant see target flying lower than the platform either
think about the actual situation :
let say F-35 flying at altitude of X thousands feet , Su-35 flying at Y thousand feet , if Y is so much bigger than X that Su-35 can stay out of EOTS FoV then F-35 will also stay out of OLS-35 FoV , if we ignore DAS then neither fighter can detect the other on their IRST
By Contrast , if X > Y then Su-35 will always stay within EOTS FoV and F-35 will always stay within OLS-35 FoV , so once again , i dont see a single advantage of having IRST on top of the nose vs below the nose

Another thing to consider , when aircraft fly at high altitude they will have to fly at positive AoA to increased lift available , which mean their nose will pitch up , which mean at high altitude it would be alot easier for F-35 to see aircraft flying higher than it than for Su-35 to detect aircraft that fly at lower altitude

b) I doubt that Mercurius wants to “feel” a Troll, nevermind feeding one and neither Mig31 or Mercurius are Troll´s

dont bother with OP ,he a real troll , just looks through his post here and you will see 😀 literally a copy of JSR lol

You’ve been here far too short to know wht everything has been claimed..

Says who? A butthurt clown who has just joined in?

he may be just joined in, but atleast the have reasonable explanation for his statement unlike you who get butt hurt when people ask for evidence of your opinion

That interesting , thanks you