dark light

Jagan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dunkirk film – Merged For General Updates And Chat #789526
    Jagan
    Participant

    One thing I am glad that i didnt do was to read up on reviews or previews – the impact of the movie timelines was much more when i figured it out.

    I am also glad I didnt see the photos of the Yakfire prior to going to the movie, otherwise, instead of enjoying the flying action scenes, I would have been “This is a Yakfire shot”, “That is a yakfire shot”, “I know where they mounted the camera on” etc etc. Not to say during the movie i sometimes wondered if some of the cockpit shots are CGI.. learning about the Yakfire has increased my respect for the effort.

    in reply to: Dunkirk film – Merged For General Updates And Chat #790547
    Jagan
    Participant

    I will say something sacrilegious … the flying scenes were realistic but lacked the cinematic drama .. err.. umm.. like the one in “Pearl Harbor” :p

    I do have some nitpicks with the aircraft (SPOILERS ALERT)
    ..
    ..
    ..
    .

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    1. The Spit appears to have unlimited ammo – I need to watch it again, but surely the firing duration went beyond 20seconds if you add it all up
    2. Wouldnt a spit that ditched go nose down fast? appeared to float pretty nicely – with that heavy merlin upfront
    3. whats the recommended way to FL on a beach ? wheels up? wheels down? isnt the danger of wheels down landing make you go tail over head if something went wrong?

    That said, I have to go and watch it again, this time more closely to see the timelines sync up… and I did find it funny that Tom Hardy had to hide his face once again behind a mask of some sorts…

    in reply to: Aircraft serial reference #818744
    Jagan
    Participant

    I know this is an old thread – but in the six years that elapsed, there is a website tool that I built at http://www.rafcommands.com/database/serials/ . Oldtimers will recall that this is Ross’s old website (under new management) and the data in the tool is based on ross’s notes above. subsequently some of the black out blocks were identified via Bruce Robertson’s book and removed.

    The tool helps partial serial search.. eg search on “MA” and “65” and see all the possibilities of serials with these characters in it… or try it by aircraft..

    in reply to: Help identifying crashed aircraft. #829014
    Jagan
    Participant

    Duh!… I should have noticed that – yes different prang for the same aircraft.

    K1289 seemed to have lived a battered life!

    Thanks for kind words on the book.

    in reply to: Help identifying crashed aircraft. #829119
    Jagan
    Participant

    Here is another view of the same prang of K1289
    http://www.rafcommands.com/galleries/var/thumbs/India1930s/Wapitis/Wapiti-K1289-crashed.jpg?m=1473027541

    I am quite sure, we saw the very same two photos elsewhere on this forum..

    Though K1289 is shown as “crashlanded in field, Pushtakhara near Peshawar 30.06.41;” It was actually flown out the next day out of the forcelanded area back to Peshawar as I found a logbook entry of it being flown out. It was probably SOC soon afterwards.

    Added Later: err.. A deja Vu moment http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?131517-Information-sought-on-crashed-aircraft&highlight=K1289

    in reply to: Please Help Me I.D. My P.1127 Kestrel #836609
    Jagan
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Kestrel Vet;2281055]Jack Ruskin,
    I followed the recommendation provided in your PM and left a voice message. That was nearly 2 weeks ago, but there has been no response. Could I perhaps trouble you for the email address?
    Thanks, Brian

    Brian,

    Bob hasn’t logged in here since 2009 but i do have some contact details. PM sent, check your in

    On sale in Connecticutt, USA
    https://hartford.craigslist.org/for/6099044701.html

    in reply to: Lysanders but look at the codes…. #840273
    Jagan
    Participant

    Jagan

    metal Mk IIa (Jupiter VI) version including the 16 inch wing stagger. (Mk IIa Jupiter VIII aircraft had a 20″ stagger plus a more raked u/c).

    There are also three sets of wings on production Wapitis and the tip curves radii stay the same which is another model drawing inaccuracy.

    That is news to me! I thought the Wings / Undercarriage between the Jupiter VI and the VIII versions were the same and only the visible differences were those engine mountings/fairings etc.. Kudos at uncovering these differences.

    Any plans to visit the IAF Museum for their Wapiti ?

    PS: I requested the mods to move the last three to four posts and merge it with the other Wapiti thread where we discussed the engine differences..

    in reply to: Lysanders but look at the codes…. #840312
    Jagan
    Participant

    By the way I’ve been conducting a lot of research on the Wapiti and Wallace and I’m firmly of the opinion that the Wapiti V’s in the batch J9708 to J9759 and those from J9725 annotated as Mk V’s were simply all short fuselage IIa’s which had been differently equipped as Army Cooperation machines (hence the Mk number change).

    The only long fuselage so called Mk.V was the makers own aircraft G-AAWA which had been used for development trials including that of the message hook fit which was later given the serial J9728 when it was handed over to the RAF engine testing establishments fitted with the Bristol Draco.

    IMO it has been wrongly called the prototype MkV because it introduced and tested the Army Co-op equipment on the Wapiti. The only series production long fuselage Wapiti variant was the Wallace.

    Thanks John. I am in agreement with you. It is amusing that this aspect got overlooked for nearly 80 years and it took a conversation on this forum and on email elsewhere to unearth the discrepancy.

    Also thanks for clarifying that the information on the aircraft on this thread may make it back to the Clipped Wings book. It would have been a tad disappointing to NOT find the info in there after all the hard work that went here.

    in reply to: Lysanders but look at the codes…. #840525
    Jagan
    Participant

    Five years later – the family behind these amazing photographs has started a KickStarter Project to get a book published with the photographs. Its only right that those who enjoyed these photographs should now pay forward to have a hard copy in our libraries.

    https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/640372561/clipped-wings-0/

    (Usual disclaimer – No personal connection/gain here other than to have the book in my shelf)

    Jagan
    Participant

    Not the first to be rebuilt but certainly the first to be built from the very humblest of beginnings, the vestiges of a battered South African firewall with a firewall plate and a stencilled RAF serial.

    Was curious.. looked around and found this

    http://www.vintagewings.ca/Portals/0/Vintage_Stories/News%20Stories%20H/SpitBits/SpitBits04.jpg

    in reply to: Excellent Quality RAF documentary video (1935) #814750
    Jagan
    Participant

    Thanks for the amazing film. four minutes into the film i was delighted to stumble on the footage of Cranwell showing a Sikh Flight Cadet under training. that is Air Commodore R H D Singh who was commissioned in mid 1935.

    This is the only footage i have seen of Indians at Cranwell and needless to say a whole bunch of indian aviation buffs are thrilled at finding this.:love-struck::love-struck::love-struck::love-struck:

    in reply to: Spitfire Query. #822962
    Jagan
    Participant

    Can I suggest another approach?

    We know it a TB Serial machine which is only 899 possibilities without black outt blocks and any non Spitfire aircraft in this range

    Can we work out what mark it is and eliminate any that say went to USSR as did a number of mk IX) or anywhere else outside the uk and also “lasted post 1945” and were in some sort of fighter command training capacity and were written off in this timeframe ? How many “candidates” would that leave?

    Then using Andrew Pentland’s production list…

    665 actually (eliminate blackout blocks and non-spittys)

    Removed All USSR and all Mk IX Left with 293 TB serialled Spit XVIs

    Removed all “Shot Down”, “Killed”, transferred to RHAF.. I am left with 258

    Removed all SOC 1945 – still ended up with 163..

    :0)

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #866902
    Jagan
    Participant

    thank you Bruce it seems to be getting a bit like children playing my dads bigger than your dad very silly really

    c’mon admit it.. it is STILL a fascinating discussion…

    Jagan
    Participant

    Apparently “Nederlandse Luchtvaart” is a rather expensive hobby paid by one single individual, but according to
    http://www.nederlandseluchtvaart.nl/forums/showthread.php?t=39803&page=3
    something is being worked out at the moment to try and reduce (hosting) costs.

    Perhaps the website/forum will get another name.

    If it doenst work out with them, I can try to help “take it” . Got some experience in this sort of thing (And a license for VBulletin to boot…)

    -Jagan

    in reply to: 132 Squadron (Bombay) #876974
    Jagan
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 488 total)