dark light

Jagan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2689405
    Jagan
    Participant

    Originally posted by yerna1
    Jagan, I still havent reached the stage of identyfying which AF an aircraft belongs to without looking at insignia. How do you know that the Hind is not Indian? Camo?

    Yerna,

    I never looked at the camo either.

    The Mi-24 in the picture has a starboard mounted Cannon pack instead of the four barelled chin mounted cannon, so its possibly a Hind F which the IAF does not operate.

    “Mi-24P (Type 24-3; `Hind-F’): Development started 1974; about 620 built 1981-90; first shown in service in 1982 photographs; P of designation refers to pushka = cannon; as Mi-24V, but nose gun turret replaced by GSh-30-2 twin-barrel 30 mm gun (with 750 rounds) in semi-cylindrical pack on starboard side of nose; bottom of nose smoothly faired above and forward of sensors.”

    -Jagan

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2689859
    Jagan
    Participant

    Originally posted by Darth Vader
    perhaps this is what you were looking for?

    http://www.geocities.com/indianpilots/mi25.htm

    This is not an Indian Mi-25.

    I like the pictures of the Mi-8s flying – never seen it before.

    in reply to: Lightning XM135, inadvertant flight by W/Cdr Holden #1824128
    Jagan
    Participant

    Oh. its those green little men I tell you, they did it….

    (thinks to myself – what a wonderful tale!)

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2650288
    Jagan
    Participant

    What vehicle is that Brahmos Launcher based on? awesome by the look of it.

    I have not seen too many Brahmos Launcher pics – this one is a good one!

    in reply to: Tropical filters ommited – why? #1825483
    Jagan
    Participant

    Do any of the static Hurricanes or Spitfires have the Volks filter?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2656924
    Jagan
    Participant

    Originally posted by Indian1973
    scanned from HAL postcard by a BR member Rishi. IJT in flight.

    The Canopy is not reflecting the background correctly – I would say a PS’ed Picture. Any comments?

    in reply to: F-5 Jag Gnat #2660934
    Jagan
    Participant

    Originally posted by BruteGorilla
    A total of 79 Ajeets were built by the time production ended in 1982. comments does not hold true in this respect.

    I have gone with the popular trend by saying that HAL never built these trainers. The problem is not much info is avaliable on what was the mix of Ajeets and Ajeet trainers. As many as 30 of Ajeet trainer are said to be built by HAL (although i myself don’t believe it)
    You can always give a benefit of doubt.

    Brute,

    The Ajeet Trainer development came too late – By the time the prototypes were being build and test flown, the IAF had taken a decision to retire them and use MiG-27s. Only Three Two seaters rolled off the production line. One lost – two went to No.2 Sqn to see some service in type training. That figure of 30 (whatever the source) does not hold good.

    regards

    Jagan

    in reply to: F-5 Jag Gnat #2660943
    Jagan
    Participant

    Originally posted by SabreAce
    Did’nt the Gnat of the red arrows look very much like the Hawk?

    Gnat trainers were developed by HAL but it does’nt say what happened to them, on the BR site.

    HAL’s ‘Ajeet’ Trainer had its second pilot seat positioned higher than the RAF Gnat Trainer versions. This offerred better visibility for the instructor on what the pupil was doing.

    HAL Manufactured three Two Seater versions of the Gnat / Ajeet Trainer. One of them crashed due to an oxygen system failure – Pilot lost consciousness.

    The other two were sent to No.2 Squadron flying the Ajeet in the late 80s – It was the last unit to fly the Ajeet. The two aircraft were used as Type Trainers by the Squadron (though overall utilisation to train the pilots was below the capacity).

    When No.2 retired its Ajeets in 1991, all the aircraft were sent to the BRD in Sulur. Probably the two seater Ajeets are still in that unit.

    in reply to: Failsworth yard Manchester(old thread 2005) #1826180
    Jagan
    Participant

    Can anyone tell me as to how all this ‘junk’ ended up in the lady’s junkyard? was she a professional scrapper who ‘won’ a scrap auction or something from the RAF?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2669458
    Jagan
    Participant

    Originally posted by Portugal
    Well, India had 50.000 soldiers with armored vehicles, aircrafts and navy ships,

    50,000 soldiers in the Goa Ops? This figure is so wrong.

    The strength in Goa was a Division and the Para Brigade – a strength of about 12-15000 troops at the most. Yes – it still outnumbers the portugese by a good margin.

    It should be taken into consideration that during the Goa Operation, the Indian Army had only One Armoured and Six infantry divisions in its whole orbat!.

    The Portugese had a small number of Armoured Cars in thier orbat.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2669466
    Jagan
    Participant

    Originally posted by Harry
    Do you have any more details on this? Or perhaps details on F-

    Around the same time, four Vampires flying from Jamnagar over the sea near Diu, noticed a Fast Patrol Boat traveling out of the Diu harbour. Upon closer observation, the Vampires were fired at by the Boat. Fg. Off. P.M. Ramachandran – the lead pilot – immediately engaged with gunfire and rockets and sank the patrol boat. For this feat he received the Shaurya Chakra.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/1960s/Goa01.html

    in reply to: Goa Firefly #2087043
    Jagan
    Participant

    dont know about the u/c – Another picture here.

    in reply to: Goa Firefly #2087756
    Jagan
    Participant

    Originally posted by Mark12
    Photos of the Mk VIII in India will shortly be posted on Jagan’s Warbirds of India site. Serious attention to the windscreen and canopy area are required. 🙁

    Err… Mark …

    >Photos of the Mk VIII in India will shortly be posted on Jagan’s

    How do you know? :d (Not that i mind…)

    Just a few tidbits about the spitfire – its not an GRP construction but a ‘rods’ and ‘metalsheets’ type of restoration.

    yes it does require some serious attention in the canopy, windshield area – and also on the wing control surfaces and wing trailing edges area.

    They could not get any one in India to mould the canopy, the only facility that could do so said they were too busy making canopys for MiGs! – so they moulded one in the back of the hangar. They could have got it right if the template they made in the first place was good enough. Ditto with the windshield.

    ‘+’ves
    1. Good representation of the Spitfire – when there was none
    2. Preservation of the relics for a future rebuild
    3. Done on a volunteer basis and ‘zero cost’.
    4. some 60-70% of the original ac saved – Wings (Sans wingtips and trailing surfaces). Central fuselage, Engine, and tail section.

    ‘-Ves’
    1. No way compares with the quality and restoration as done in places like UK.

    Photos online (hopefully by 1st Jan)

    The firefly IIRC is not actually a crash relic..I think it survived as a complete fuselage (sans engine) somewhere in the navy’s workshops. Can anyone take a look at the wings and let me know?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Pictures #2683596
    Jagan
    Participant

    mig low

    How come nobody noticed this pic?

    in reply to: A treat for Spitfire fanatics #2097919
    Jagan
    Participant

    I guess this is the best thread to post the news – thanks for the tip aditya

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/printedition/020803/detNAT14.shtml
    IAF Restores wrecked Spitfire from Ambala.

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 488 total)