dark light

Bomberboy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 784 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2034055
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    First P8I Poseidon for India

    http://www.airplane-pictures.net/images/uploaded-images/2011-9/12/156109s.jpg

    :confused:I don’t understand, so what was the aircraft posted in post #245 yesterday then??

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2034058
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    Cockney,

    You are a gentleman and a schollar sir…:cool:
    I doff my hat to you………(that’s if I wore one), but please, please, keep em coming for us QEC starved individuals.

    Bomberboy

    in reply to: Strength of the RN with QEC #2034077
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    Perhaps think about this: Japan and Germany spend much less on defence in the first decades after the Second World War – and they surpassed the USA and Britain economically, had higher living standards etc. Britain was already ruined by the amount it has to spent for the Second World War – and it was further weakened by the relatively high defence spending in the Cold War. The irony of history is that the loosers of the Second World War were the economically the winners of the second half of the 20th century – whereas all the major winners (USA, Russia, Britain) lost heavily in case of productivity, exports, living standard etc.

    Leon, i’m not feeling it for you and i’m trying to see if you have some kind of underlying UK bashing going on there, because that is where I see it coming from? :confused:
    I think that believing that germany and Japan were being in someway ‘prudent’, as you would intimate is probably a bit too stretched for my liking.
    The fact is, is that the ‘winning nations’ were actually paying the very nations that lost, for that win and investing in one way or the other to try and get those nations back on their feet.
    I’m not going to go too far into it, but I believe VW are a good example of that.

    How I see it, and no I’m not any kind of naval expert, is that one way or another, I want to see my navy have what it needs in order to cover its obligations and offer me and my friends a good level of protection with good kit.
    I don’t know where the threat might come from, but then that is exactly the point at hand.
    The fact is that apart from one or two (yourself being one of them), I am constantly told by people who do know more than me, that as a nation WE DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH ASSETS – PERIOD, which is good enough for me.
    Unfortunately People such as yourself will never ever persuede me with the ‘it’ll be alright on the night’ kind of attitude, when we are already into the next day after the night in question.

    I am involved in all kinds of major projects, nothing to do with warfighting, but all to do with infrastructure, which as a nation we do need and it still takes frustratingly too many bloody years to happen.

    If I, or many others had a proverbial crystal ball so that we could spend exactly the minimum amount of money at exactly the right time to take care of all issues when they arise, then i’d be a rich rich man because i’d be using it for my own personal gain. The sad fact is we havent and i’m not!!!:( (mores the pity).

    17 first class destroyers and frigates..

    Please help me out here. You portray yourself as a knowledgeable, rational intelligent individual, whereas there’s me with poor maths for example, please tell me what 13 added to 6 equals? :rolleyes:
    You expect people to hear a purported educated argument, yet you fail to even check your posting for a simple maths calculation.

    is much more than most navies have – including navies of states, which are economically stronger than Britain..

    Excellent, I’m happy with that situation so long may it continue..:diablo:……..once we get there of course which is unlikely. 🙁

    Bomberboy

    in reply to: Video: Shoreham RAFA Air Show Sunday 21st August 2011 #500445
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    Cracking Gromit!!!

    in reply to: Hurricane incident , North Weald. #1023107
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    Question?

    When is an accident not an accident ????

    Ans; When no one has got any evidence only speculation and rumour

    :D:D:D:D:D:D:D

    Fantastic.
    I wish I could see the painful expressions on those that are desperate to be first with the news….whatever that might be!

    in reply to: Hurricane incident , North Weald. #1031090
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    Question?

    When is an accident not an accident ????

    Ans; When no one has got any evidence only speculation and rumour

    :D:D:D:D:D:D:D

    Fantastic.
    I wish I could see the painful expressions on those that are desperate to be first with the news….whatever that might be!

    in reply to: Invincible no more #1023117
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    Would agree that Invicible had probably served as a spares source for Ark and Illustrious for some time

    I believe that is exactly what she was used for.
    IIRC when she was laid up in 2005, the MOD said that they’d keep her ‘mothballed’ for 5 years. Well 6 years is close enough I suppose.

    Ironically I had good fortune to fly over her at anchor in the middle of the solent the day before she paid off on 31st July 2005. (I didn’t know that at the time).
    She had one harrier on the deck on the ski jump and one sea king with folded blades up against the island.

    in reply to: Invincible no more #1031101
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    Would agree that Invicible had probably served as a spares source for Ark and Illustrious for some time

    I believe that is exactly what she was used for.
    IIRC when she was laid up in 2005, the MOD said that they’d keep her ‘mothballed’ for 5 years. Well 6 years is close enough I suppose.

    Ironically I had good fortune to fly over her at anchor in the middle of the solent the day before she paid off on 31st July 2005. (I didn’t know that at the time).
    She had one harrier on the deck on the ski jump and one sea king with folded blades up against the island.

    in reply to: Invincible no more #1024405
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    I’m sure that this has already been on here before.
    If not here then it will almost certainly have been on the Naval aviation section.
    It been gone a good couple or three months already IIRC.
    Very sad to have seen the end of a historic vessel.

    in reply to: Invincible no more #1032368
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    I’m sure that this has already been on here before.
    If not here then it will almost certainly have been on the Naval aviation section.
    It been gone a good couple or three months already IIRC.
    Very sad to have seen the end of a historic vessel.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2035326
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    Excellent pics CJ.
    It’s nice to see the first bit of a QE in a more tangible way in the water under her own weight :D!

    in reply to: Hurricane incident , North Weald. #1025394
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    Pagen,
    You are indeed correct and the fact that you have seen fit to respond means that you do give me the impression that you understand where I am coming from.
    I read the thread as I try to read all threads.
    The thread seemed a little more that just polite interest to me, with people having strong disagreement for what was as you say in the end, fortunately only a low speed taxying accident.
    I was indeed commenting generally as a result of this thread which did have speculation due to the title, as you also recognised.

    I suppose one of the things appears to me and was maybe the case with this thread, some form of ‘I posted it first’ and so therefore ‘I am in the know’ mentality, which as seems to be the case here, is posted in haste before checking the details.

    in reply to: Hurricane incident , North Weald. #1033482
    Bomberboy
    Participant

    Pagen,
    You are indeed correct and the fact that you have seen fit to respond means that you do give me the impression that you understand where I am coming from.
    I read the thread as I try to read all threads.
    The thread seemed a little more that just polite interest to me, with people having strong disagreement for what was as you say in the end, fortunately only a low speed taxying accident.
    I was indeed commenting generally as a result of this thread which did have speculation due to the title, as you also recognised.

    I suppose one of the things appears to me and was maybe the case with this thread, some form of ‘I posted it first’ and so therefore ‘I am in the know’ mentality, which as seems to be the case here, is posted in haste before checking the details.

    in reply to: Maginificent SAAF DC-4 display #1025427
    Bomberboy
    Participant
    in reply to: Maginificent SAAF DC-4 display #1033513
    Bomberboy
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 784 total)