dark light

merlin85

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #832627
    merlin85
    Participant

    Well I popped down, but no one was around, better luck next time.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #836702
    merlin85
    Participant

    Just wondering if anyone knows are tours still available? I’m in the area next Saturday, it would be great to have a look round

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #774283
    merlin85
    Participant

    I hear today from various sources that the future is looking bright for WR963, I must say I have been a tad confused of late with the various stories I’ve heard! So does this mean the Charity is finished? Presumably the investigation found no wrongdoing?

    in reply to: VTTS Hard Facts Finally Coming Home To Roost? #812723
    merlin85
    Participant

    Just catching up here, my question is, How on earth does it cost £200,000 to put XH558 into storage? The releases from VTTS state the new hangar will be funded by the developers then leased by VTTS, so the 200k isn’t going there is it! Personally, and I may get slated for saying this, I think Dr Pleming needs to stop drawing a wage, he’s had a hell of a cut over the years, but he did make it happen, however, if he us now drawing a substantial wage from a static aircraft that is to be locked away he seriously needs a reality check! If the aircraft’s interest are in his heart he needs to seriously rethink his current status!

    in reply to: Nimrod XV232 #814909
    merlin85
    Participant

    Ah right, that’s ok then, hopefully I’ll see you at the taxy run!

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #823461
    merlin85
    Participant

    Scotavia, I’ll second that, a bit of clarity and honesty goes a long way!!

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #823645
    merlin85
    Participant

    Peter Mills,
    As I have nothing to hide I will gladly answer your question.
    My name is Pete Ward, I have supported many aviation projects over the years as I love to see these beautiful warbirds flying, and I fully appreciate the costs involved. As money is hard earned I like to ensure it goes to worthy causes, so I always take the time to research the projects fully. I would love to see WR963 fly, but upon researching the project I found several anomalies which prompted me to ask the questions which Rich has kindly answered to the best of his ability.
    I don’t see any issue with my user name ,its a common enough thing to do, as displayed by the majority of members of this forum.
    Thanks

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #823655
    merlin85
    Participant

    Thanks Rich,
    Just a thing, you may or may not be able to answer this, talking to a good friend last night regarding the project, he donated money to SPT, and the hanger appeal through the website, he was wondering if this money gets transferred over to yourselves or if it stays with SPT until its fate is decided? Hes not on here hence the question.
    Thanks.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #823966
    merlin85
    Participant

    Thankyou for taking the time to answer my query, I’m sure this will answer other peoples questions too. When I was young I was always taught that actions speak louder than words, although the actions can take time to fulfil, I will continue to follow yourselves, bearing that in mind, and hopefully get down for the taxy run, work permitting!
    I do feel once you have all the public information corrected to match your statements that went out in the summer you should gain more support. Obviously the public, including myself like registered charities as it offers a touch more security with our donations, and better clarity of the goal of the organisation, not to mention the trust that comes with charitable status.
    Perhaps in the future I will help you, once I see some clarity, which, no disrespect, there does seem to have been a lack of recently. People do, like myself, check things out in the public domain to see if things are what they seem, statements, posts and public information do need to tally for projects to succeed, I shall continue to do so over the coming months.
    I do hope you had a good Christmas,
    All the best.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #824507
    merlin85
    Participant

    Thanks for the reply, however, some things here don’t seem to tally up, perhaps you can help.
    Before I make a donation no matter how big or small, I always do a bit of background research on the project so I can assure myself my hard earned money is going to a worthy cause, as I have donated fairly substantial sums to various aviation projects in the past.
    What I see from the public information available, is of some concern to me as a donor.
    Firstly, you say the Shackleton Preservation Trust is dormant, upon a check on the Charities Commission website it appears to still be operating, no mention of it being dormant. Moreso, the link on your website to donate is live and appears to direct money to the trust.
    Secondly I see you claim the Trust don’t own the aircraft or the spares stock, however G-SKTN is registered to the Trust, not a single person, and declared as owned, not chartered. I am aware the CAA see misrepresentation as a serious offence. Furthermore there are documents relating to the sale of an engine, by the trust and declared through the trust, if the spares package doesn’t belong to the trust how can this be? the documents also state that the spares belong to the trust but the aircraft doesn’t.

    http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/Accounts/Ends51/0001020951_ac_20110331_e_c.pdf
    https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?catid=1&pagetype=65&appid=1&mode=reg&fullregmark=SKTN

    I also see that you had a kickstarter appeal for NDT work to be carried out, and an appeal for hangerage, although the hanger appeal was last stated at around £10k, half of the target. I see the NDT was to take place in the winter of 2015/2016, then 2016/2017, is this still happening? Funds raised publicly for a specific stated goal must only be used for that goal otherwise must be refunded less any incentives given.

    Unfortunatly the above shows a poorly run project, with what seems to be poor administration over a period of time if the posts i read from the summer regarding ownership of WR963 and spares etc are anything to go by. I feel you need to much more clear cut regarding exactly whats what with your project, as for example if you rely on the Trust spares (which seem clear to belong to the trust) to operate but you have severed the aircraft from the trust how will you continue? also the kickstarter was billed as the trust, but you claim the aircraft doesn’t belong to the trust, what happens to that money now?
    Any project like this needs to be clear to the public, yours, doesn’t appear that way. There are many success stories out there from similar projects, but to succeed you need the publics donations, as im sure your aware.

    Merry Christmas

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #825172
    merlin85
    Participant

    Now that does sound promising, and well done for sorting the troubles out! Now, I would like to help you out with a donation, or possibly a taxy ride place depending upon price? Also, if I donate are you still a registered charity? Sorry to be intrusive, I can do it through the business that’s all!

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #825300
    merlin85
    Participant

    Ok great stuff, will these taxy runs be available to the public as just Jane? I presume this means you’ve got your problems sorted out, I’ve read through this thread and you do seem to have had some ups and downs.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #825325
    merlin85
    Participant

    Are there any open days planned in the near future? The last time I saw WR963 was about 10 years ago at Coventry looking very sorry for herself. She does seem to have had a rather turbulent life, it would be good to see her back in the air, as it looks unlikely pelican 22 will ever fly again.

    in reply to: Spitfire NH341 – engine runs #825484
    merlin85
    Participant

    Another stunning restoration by ARC! Well done!!

    in reply to: Shackleton 1722 #826394
    merlin85
    Participant

    Thanks for the responses, the photos are brilliant, thanks for posting them, I see what you mean with the crew! Such a shame they couldn’t continue flying her, a beautiful aircraft!
    I have read more recently they have given her the odd ground run, but with the watercanon salute it does seem her flying days are over. But, we can hope!

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 30 total)