Better? Quite possibly, but it isn’t yet available! As I said, when do you want these planes? Because if you think the F-35 is the best choice, then you have to decide what to do for the next 10 years or so – a point which you haven’t addressed.
Let’s assume the IAF decides to buy F-35s. What’s its short to medium-term procurement strategy, until the F-35s can be delivered? Accelerate Su-30 deliveries? Buy more of an existing type like the Mirage 2000 or MiG-29? Buy some F-16s or Gripens? Oh! We’re back to the MRCA debate. 🙁
Now do you understand?
Surely accelerating MKI, getting 50 odd Mig 29 & getting LCA online with/without kaveri. Restricting Mig(MRCA) orders would free up $ for LCA & Kaveri development & indo-russian 5 gen AC.
But if we look the issue in bigger scale, there is only one way that china could narrow this lead that India enjoys, and that is to get the Varyag operational before Gorky…Gorshkov should be ready in 2010, but Indian warship building industry (as the final refitting is supposed to carry out in Indian shipyards) is know for it’s long building times and lacking behind schedules so who knows? If China can get Varyag operational in let say, 2008? Then there is theoretical few years plus to chinese. But then again is few years making any difference? Russians had Kuznetsov running trials since later part of the eighties, but it was only in 2003-5 when the airoperations were fully in hand…
Who told u that chinese are refurbishing varyag? How do explain that chinese who havent even operated a fully operational carriers can build one faster than russian? What kind of logic people use :rolleyes: .
Equally what has the Kuznetsov got to do with China?
Isn’t it currently operational in Russia?
Then why the hell this topic. India wont be attacking russia with Carriers, while chinese have none in working condition, nor have any experience of fielding a carrier in a war.
Its fine talking of 5 gen russian AC, but we should be really looking at f35s which will get online b4 any russian AC.
—————————————————————-
The Indian Military Avition Industry isnt going to learn much from the JSF. Hell, the US isnt even willing to share that tech with its closest ally the UK.
Isnt jsf better than whats on offer for MRCA? MRCA is purely waste of monies on 4/4.5 gen AC, when 5 gen AC like jsf is/could be available. And jsf @ 50-60 M* is way better VFM than european MRCA AC.
Its fine talking of 5 gen russian AC, but we should be really looking at f35s which will get online b4 any russian AC.
Russia’s RAC-MiG has quietly dropped its offer of the so-called MiG-35 derivative of the MiG-29M. Instead, the company is now offering its I-2000 fifth-generation M-MRCA, for which RAC-MiG did significant R & D work throughout the 1990s under its privately-funded Logkiy Frontovi Istrebilte project. In fact, a highly classified briefing on two distinct variants of the I-2000 was given to defence minister Pranab Mukherjee in Moscow last November (FORCE November 2005, pages 8-9) following which he reportedly told Russian officials rather bluntly that the ministry of defence (MoD) would be more inclined towards co-developing the I-2000 with Russia rather than go for the MiG-35. The I-2000 will have a blended fuselage and thick wing centre-section. To be equipped with fly-by-light flight control systems, an all-digital nav-attack system containing French, Indian and Israeli avionics, and powered by NPO Saturn’s twin AL-41FP turbofans with thrust vectoring exhaust nozzles, the tandem-seat I-2000 will be capable of supercruise (sustaining supersonic speeds without engaging the engine’s afterburners) as well as super-manoeuvrability. More than 50 per cent of the I-2000’s airframe will be built with composite materials, and the aircraft will have a gross take-off weight of 15 tonnes, and a weapons payload of five tonnes. Both Rosoboronexport State Corp and RAC-MiG have assured the MoD that first deliveries of the I-2000 would begin within 48 months of contract signature. RAC-MiG and India’s state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) would jointly build up to four flying prototypes and two pre-production flight-worthy variants for the I-2000’s accelerated flight-test-cum-airworthiness certification schedule, which will be completed by 2010.
Wasnt I-2000 the same AC which iran is also developing, something called shafaq… ? Is AL-41 ready? And isnt 48 months timeframe for prototype testing too ambitious?
the Astra’s quoted range is more like 70 kms, not 10 kms.
Astra is nearer to 80 Km.
As highsea said, how funny is that, congratulations! You just adopt another god. But to me, that’s no different, u’d better say as you said, because I know u better than that anonymity , so I’ll use ur concrete logic u love to use: before you come out any concrete proof saying that WS10 is based on any Russian core engine, I won’t answer any of ur nonsense
Every one know ur credibilty. If u arent interested than go to hell. Instead of dissing others credibility, first earn it for urself.
Hopefully this thread is not repeating like the previous one, so I might just answer the question.
Me too, or else were do one gets a sneak preview into chinese AC for free :D.
For two days I have been trying to search reports in the internet about the feedback, but I couldn’t find any. I think no any feedback has been published.
I think Chinese posters here are the same like you, and I don’t think anyone here has any kind of report.
If u have posted earlier, those two thread wouldnt had to be locked, u see :cool:. Still better late, than never.
Since, no one has any kind of answer that you are asking, let’s move on and stick to the topic.
Ya lets move on. I would like to know what feedback does plaaf or air wing of plan has given for the same. How much they rate their domestic wares?
Instead of making logical explanation, they are trying hard & giving illogical assumptions on ws10. As highsea has said, they hasnt shown any signs of developing an advance jet engines. And repeated orders of AL-31 shows its long way away from such reality full stop
What is the RCS of this fully loaded EF2000?
It now certainly confirmed that brahmos will be fitted into subs, but will the extended version too would be fitted or just the 290Km version?
Also how can India fully exploit the exportability of brahmos? Already few countries has shown gr8 interest in it, but what more could be done?
This is the second time this topic has been assassinated by individuals apparently purposely trying to cause problems just for the sake of causing problems.
Purpose of any forums is to ask, Q, & get a fair explanation on the subject matter. But some ppl with tinted nationalism do like to Q the persons integrity & their race & dont bother to give specific answers. So whose the problem maker, guy asking Q or guy bring everything nonsense & not answering them.
I will like to repeat again the Q earlier asked,
What is the feedback on chinese weapons exported tilldate?
The Congress and Left rejected it , The BJP was not named , so they couldnt reject it .
Lets toe the official line here , our politician are clean and dont indulge in anti-national activities or take money for personal gains 😉
The ex KGB memories are just a bunch of lies 😀
Too much to digest :D.
But one can say that russians are more sentitive to India’s needs, that any one else. Thats the gain of being second largest buyer of russian weapons.
Why dont brazil take a peep into fc-1? If taken at face value comments of chinese members here, it could satisfy their needs.