Is Dhanush suppose to be sub launch too?
Can rafales take off from this carriers, or it too needs steam catapult system?
HMS Invicible
INVINCIBLE CLASS AIRCRAFT CARRIERS, UNITED KINGDOM
The first-of-class HMS Invincible Aircraft Carrier was built by Vickers Shipbuilding and Engineering (now BAE Systems Marine) at Barrow-in-Furness. The ship was commissioned in July 1980. The two sister ships HMS Illustrious and HMS Ark Royal, both built at the Swan Hunter Shipbuilders yard in Wallsend, were commissioned in 1982 and 1985.Since the end of the Cold War, the primary role of the 20,600t aircraft carriers has changed from sea control to maritime force projection, to include maritime strike, littoral manoeuvres and command and control of land operations. The vessels now embark a Tailored Air Group (TAG), consisting of Joint Force Harrier (JFH) aircraft and Sea King and Merlin helicopters.
The ship accommodates over 1,000 crew, including 350 aircrew with 80 officers. It also has capacity for an additional 500 marines.
The vessels were armed with a Sea Dart twin launcher, installed on the forecastle of the ship near the ski ramp. However, the missile system has been removed from all three carriers and the flight deck extended, to provide more capacity for aircraft and enable take-off for RAF Harrier GR.7/9 aircraft. HMS Invincible completed a refit in March 2003. Illustrious completed refit at Babcock’s Rosyth yard in November 2004.
In March/April 2003, HMS Ark Royal was deployed as part of the UK task force in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. On board were Merlin HMA1 and Sea King ASaC Mk 7 helicopters, the first operational deployment of these aircraft.
HMS Invincible was decommissioned in August 2005. However, she has not been withdrawn from service but will remain available to the Navy until 2010.
COMMAND SYSTEMS
The combat data system is BAE SYSTEMS ADIMP with communication links Link 10, Link 11 and Link 14. Following refit, HMS Invincible has had the combat system upgraded to the same standard as Illustrious and Ark Royal, with new multi-function consoles and flat-panel colour displays. The secure satellite communications system, the Astrium (formerly Matra Marconi) SCOT, has the capacity to handle data rates up to 2Mb/s.
BAE Systems is upgrading the combat data system on Illustrious and Ark Royal with Link 16, for anti-air warfare control and aircraft direction, and a new IFF (Interrogation Friend or Foe) tracking capability.
GUNS
HMS Ark Royal is armed with three Mark 15 Phalanx close-in weapon systems (CIWS) from Raytheon and General Dynamics. Each Phalanx CIWS has one 20mm M61A1 Vulcan Gatling-principle gun which fires 3,000 rounds/min at a range of 1.5km.
HMS Invincible and Illustrious each have three Thales Nederland (formerly Signaal) Goalkeeper CIWS. Goalkeeper’s Gatling principle 30mm gun provides a maximum firing rate of 4,200 rounds/min with a range of 1,500m.
All three carriers are also equipped with two GAM-B01 20mm guns from Oerlikon-Contraves and BAE SYSTEMS, which have a maximum range of 2km and firing rate of 1,000 rounds/min.
COUNTERMEASURES
The Invincible class is fitted with the Thales Defence Type 675(2) jamming system and a UAT(8) electronic support measures system also supplied by Thales Defence (formerly Racal).
The ship’s decoy system is the Royal Navy’s Outfit DLJ with Sea Gnat. There are eight 130mm six-barrel launchers produced by Hunting Engineering. Chemring and Pains Wessex produce the Sea Gnat chaff and infra-red decoys.
AIRCRAFT
The ship supports nine Harrier aircraft (both the Royal Air Force GR7/GR9 Harrier II and the Royal Navy FA2 Sea Harrier, now operated by the combined RAF/RN Joint Force Harrier), nine Sea King HAS 6 antisubmarine warfare helicopters and three Sea King AEW 2 and ASaC Mk 7 airborne early warning helicopters. FA2 Sea Harrier aircraft will be retired by 2007. Landing trials with the Merlin HM.1 helicopter have taken place on the Ark Royal, which is the first carrier to deploy the Merlin.
The runway is about 170m long with a ski ramp set at 12°. In the hangar deck the aircraft is tethered to the floor using securing chains with tension clamps. Strachan and Henshaw have been contracted to install a replacement aircraft carrier lift system. Selex Sensors & Airborne Systems (formerly Galileo Avionica) was contracted to supply the SPN-720 precision approach radar for the landing of Harrier GR9 aircraft on Ark Royal and Illustrious in February 2005.
SENSORS
The BAE Systems Type 909 G/H-band fire control radar, which provided target tracking and illumination for the Sea Dart missile, has been removed from the three carriers. BAE Systems Type 996 surface search radar antennae is mounted very high on the tower between the two funnels. HMS Ark Royal has Type 992. Both radars operate at E and F-bands. BAE Systems Type 1022 air search radar operates at D-band. HMS Invincible and Ark Royal are equipped with Kelvin Hughes Type 1006 navigation radar and HMS Illustrious has Type 1007, both operating at I-band.
Ark Royal and Illustrious are being fitted with the Galileo Avionica SPN-720 precision approach radar to provide landing guidance for the Harrier GR9 aircraft.
Qinetiq, with Babcock Design & Technology, has been awarded a contract to provide an advanced technology mast communications and radar mast for HMS Ark Royal. The sensors and antennas will be housed within the structure, protected from the environment. The mast is due to enter service in late 2005.
The sonar system is the hull-mounted Type 2016 active/passive search and attack sonar by Thales Underwater Systems (formerly Thomson Marconi Sonar).
PROPULSION
The ship is powered by COGAG (combined gas turbine and gas turbine), consisting of four Rolls Royce Olympus TM3B gas turbine engines generating 97,000hp, providing a speed of 28 knots. At the economical speed of 19 knots the range of the ship is 7000 miles.
It surely is potent system, but how much it cost 1.5-2 billion USD. And another 1-2 billion US for refit & upgrade. I think, IN will be better off with indegenious carrier.
Well, with the JSF selling in number much larger than the F-16 & F/A-18 combined. The price should be reasonable……….. 😀
I somehow suspect that JSF will cost in the region of 60-70 million USD. We are talking of delivery dates of 2013 & not 2006 here, so inflation, escalation on R&D etc factors will increase its price.
What is the demand for JSF from USAF, USN, UK, Aussies, Holland, turkey & all other JSF grp of nations.
I think India would seriously consider buying a small number of JSF’s in the future for its ADS Carriers. Of course much would depend on continued good relation with the US and how the JSF matures over the next 5-10 years. :rolleyes:
FLY NAVY 😎
I Guess, if invited to JSF grp, IAF & IN will be acquiring their versions. And if the price of JSF doesnt escalate too much from its original price tag of 45 million USD, India can be one of the significant buyers. But for that to happen needs various factors to play their part.
size. 😀
What about range, passenger no.s?
A-319s, A-320s and A-321s
Can any explain the diff between these three planes.
By building an assembly line it will surely give airbus a leverage for future acquistions from china. Though currently 150 A320/319, it will increase with further orders.
May be DRDO is not *perfect* as French or Russian are, but that brings the larger question on how to support indigenous critical and non-critical weapons program.
I think we need to decentralise DRDO. Divide it into 3 parts one for each services & let AF DRDO make something for their needs, same for army & navy. in todays time everything has to go through all those procidures which enlarges the process. Three smaller completely working in cohesion for their service may bring better results. Also the final product producer like HAL/HVF Avadi, Various dockyards etc should work closely with the AF/IA/IN & its R&D wing.
In the end it should mean cut the crap ie bureautic hurdles & increase productivity.
Yes I agree , thats why I stated that all things being equal , Reaction time of Trishul is much less then the often quoted 6 sec
What makes you feel Trishul is in any way inferior to Barak-1 in any respect , Both have their respective strong points , But a non-partial look at both the systems , you will reckon the fact that Trishul is Head & Shoulder above Barak-1 .
Doubt very much. Trishul has been in testing stage for ages. When its gonna be inducted. What are the results of those tests. They have been testing & proclaiming its success, when its goining to be inducted in fair no.s .