Well, the best is not only change to EJ200, but fit DSI as JSF air-intake.
Very rare pic. I think here I can ask every rare pix I want.
Well, thanks for your reply PhantomII and Would u tell me Have ever seen there are pylons being between B-52’s engine bay each side. I mean not between engine and airframe.
Great thanks for all you guys, I have made sure that loading capability of B-29 is more than Lancaster, according to your posts, but I am still lacking acurrate size of their bomber bay with how long (for B-29) how wide and how tall it is.
Well, I believe that lancaster could carry more bomb just because of a special refit for Grand Slam. But I still hope get size of bomberbay of them to make sure B-29 has bigger bomber bay than lancaster so generally could load more bombs.
merci
Hello Jan:
The book you mentioned just is I have been reading now. but there is no illustration in the book. I do have some picture post before if you do search of what all my posted in this board before. They are belong to 1400series I believe but what’s the accurate number?
Dear Papa Lima:
I have to say the picture you post is very interesting, as I have known the A36 is a kind of nuclear bomber develop from project1350, whereas 1400 series also is a kind of cupercruise bomber like British TSR.2 which shape also are very closer to TSR.2 or Soviet SukhoiT-4 or TsybinNM-1, but what the 1400 series’s shape just is my suspect. I do want a confirmation from you. The bigger problem is if what I said was correct, then how the 1500 series that based on 1300 series and 1400 series develop to a Canard FIGHTER aircraft. I am reading a book called System 37 Viggen, which has mentioned all my said here by some littile signs but with pictures, so I want some picture to prove all my guesses and questions. Here is one of the web about A36 bomber to share with you. http://travels.larp.se/xplane/a36/a36.html
I think rest of 1300 series and what’s a 1400 series have to rely on your books.
regards
I mean the layout before prototype of viggen, which also means there are many layouts exist before the prototype of viggen you posted above.
Thank for both Papa Lima and Jan, you are so enthusiastic,factually, I want all of 1300 series 1400 series those are bomber layouts as I have already known and 1500 series pictures of layout with intruduce. Some of books about Viggen I have seen before, but never found out pictures of those layout only few words mentioned 1300, 1400, 1500 series. Would you please scan those pictures of layouts to my email if they’re really published? Some books I have no way to find out of library, sorry, I am really poor with no money to buy every books which dissertate viggen.
Would you please give me a link to show some layout before prototype of viggen directly?
Well, thanks Jan:
In terms of I known totally 14 Bellanca C-27s has been built include seaplane type with single engine, but the Colombia’s is twin engine. So I want to know are those be refitted or are news? Why , when , and how many twin engine Model 77 has been built and how many to be transfer to Colombia?
Who do you know which web does this picture originally come from?
As we knew that no matter range, celling, climb rate, turn rate, T/W rate, Radar Range, max load, top speed, the PhantomII was better than rest of them.
On the other side, the prototype of Phantom first flew in 1958, whereas Flogger was in 1965. The PhantomII also was much earlier than Flogger.