Hi All,
Hey, Batman Geoff,
Your comma key appears to only work once a post…;o)
It wasn’t just the soft right that he enticed. Others found him to be a man they could work with and he was happy to accommodate them by not bringing socialism into his politics.
Strange that the Tories jumped into bed with the Libs when, of the big three, they were the left wing of British main stream politics over the last decade and a half…
…a slightly different interpretation of ‘assault’…
An assault is an assault is an assault. You might not end up dead, or with broken bones or fewer teeth, but you have still been assaulted.
This morning I heard on the radio that traffic wardens in Southend have been issued with DNA collecting kits to help convict people who assault them by spitting at them. In the past attempts to bring such cases to court were dismissed due to lack of evidence and eyewitnesses making claims, for example, that her husband hadn’t spat at the warden (although in that case was actually caught on CCTV and he was convicted). Do you believe that spitting at somebody is as much an assault as stabbing or swearing at them?
Male rape (by women) used to be laughed out of court because the general opinion was that any man would be happy to enter a sexual union and surely wouldn’t turn down such an offer. And, of course, no man is going to admit in court that he was less of a man for letting a woman molest him unless there was something wrong with him… Even further back it was the same with men raping men – he must have wanted it, he could have just turned away or closed his legs so he must have been a willing participant…
He probably has other internal affairs to sort out in the short term – if the referendum goes his way, of course.
Yes, ha ha.
The difference between the two is that the Monty Python video is, um, between two consenting adults whilst the other was an unconsented criminal assault.
Hmm, must be why I chose it…
But would it be an internal affair we would be sorting out by that point?
Oddly this measure was supported by one of the Philippines largest makers of firearms, Armscor which started as a backyard garage operation.
Wouldn’t that just be Armscor protecting their own business from the more amateur rivals who might be driven out by the requirement to obtain a licence?
Can someone explain why we care so much about the Ukraine (Wasn’t there a treaty, and then of course oil) ?
Isn’t this just Russia sorting out it’s own internal affairs?
I’d have liked to have said because we have a care about the wellbeing of our fellow downtrodden man, under threat from one of those big bully nations who just can’t stand the thought that things carry on in nation states without consultation with their neighbours, but on here that’s not very popular (meh) so lets just mumble something about caring because it pi-cheeses Putin off, it will increase the immigration from that area to Britain, and it allows us to flex our muscles and show off our toys (not that they haven’t had a lot of showing off in Afghanistan and Iraq in the last 10 years or more).
And how about comparing the Ukraine problem with Scotland in a few years time, if an independent Scotland took it upon itself to make noises about not doing business with the rest of Britain but jump into bed with China, so we sent the tanks in and ignored the rest of the worlds opinion because it was just one of our internal affair problems that we were sorting out? Or something.
As Trumper says – too dark. But if there is an additional auxiliary lens fitted as well then that could have fooled the idiot proof exposure computer into making the image darker.
Use your image manipulator (Photoshop or similar) to lighten the image, although this will have a knock on effect in the shadows. There is no ‘good’ high light visible in any of the displayed images, so I suspect that you may have already darkened them (unless the auxiliary lens was not compensated for when the picture was taken) for effect.
Did you use flash? If you have no choice you could get a bit of A4 white card (or stiffened paper) and bounce light in to display the water droplets in a better light. Silver foil can also be used, but is a lot shinier and the effect might be spoiled by the harder reflections and pinpoint high light created.
Alternatively move on to something else a bit more challenging- can I suggest whiskers on kittens…?;o)
(Bits added after auxiliary lens info provided by Linc-y…)
Nice to see some Vernon Watson graffiti for a change!
We don’t know because there are a few thousand Russian personnel based in Crimea by mutual agreement anyway.
So they were the ones ‘guarding’ places in combat gear with no badges, etc?
I see your point Warren, so instead of “Resuscitate”, read, “Failing to feed, give drink, or any care whatsoever” until the patient finally dies.
Just about the same as pulling the plug, in as many words?.
It protects the medics from a charge of unlawful death.
IIRC Warren, Care homes for those that are in need of same in Scotland, are paid for. I think it’s morally wrong, that anyone should have to sell their homes to pay for the right to live to a peaceful end. I would like to think that all of my hard earned, paying off the house would benefit my kids, not the State, who have robbed me, you and many others in Taxes etc, and then deprive you of leaving your family a legacy.
Have a word with the right wing contingent around here and ask them about where their taxes go, whether they are in favour of their money being used for the benefit of others… Essentially Obamacare is the same thing in America.
Euthanasia is still widely practiced in UK hospitals, but it’s just not talked about.
My experiences with both my parents and two brothers, was that the Doc would have a quiet word with us, asking if we wanted to stop whatever was keeping them alive, i.e. drugs or machines.
Exactly,
And if they’re not being kept alive by drugs, machines, etc, then someone would need to kill them – no other way to put it. Many doctors won’t do it since they went into medicine to heal, not kill, and those who might could end their careers off then or after a long drawn out court case.
And meanwhile people who want to die get to suffer.
I would personally always go with the wishes of the individual. No Government should have the power or veto over life of an individual. They are elected to run a country not decide when we should die.
It might depend on what might happen to the doctor or relative afterwards – not what the politician says with his smug smile in front of the press. The pm or your mp can make all the pledges in the world but, unless it is allowable in law, it is not going to mean diddly squat in court.
Your sense of humour is lacking some what. I bet you love The Good Life, The Goodies and Birds of a Feather.
Um, no. I had to look them up (mostly) but since you mentioned them I guess they are high in your comedic top ten…
I’m more a Blackadder, Black Books, Father Ted sort of guy.
The mind of the Chav is rather limited in intelligence
Ah ha, something we can agree on.
so no.
Oh.
Indeed, it’s not just an American thing. Nevertheless its pretty common to hear in the news that some nitwit has decided to storm a Campus or a School, so yes… It’s not just an American thing, however there’s a pretty significant gap to the next country that witnesses such mindlessness.
Gun count per head in Switzerland and Finland is very high, yet somehow they tend not to shoot as many people in the face as they do in the US.
Look, there are more then enough loonies on here without firing up the one nation who would claim that you can only remove their right to bare arms from their cold, dead fingers. Yes, Switzerland and Finland have a high gun count but that is because (at least for Switzerland anyway) there is a gun culture that requires each adult male to be in the military reserve and have a gun in their house. Russia and Australia (alcohol and boredom the big factor) are all other gun carrying suicide/murder places but nobody turns a school/college/cinema/post office/McDonalds in a blood splattered, charnel house of death like an American with a grievance and a gun. Canada also has guns but, unlike their big southern neighbour, they
But I didn’t want to type anything like that; I was happy for you to bring it up and get the gun freaks knocking on your door with their grievances and guns – aren’t you pleased to be living in Britain where only some criminals are armed, not all those crazies who have a pathological need to tell you they own guns? But that’s you saying that, not me…;o)
I recon all the bleeding hearts of the Human rights brigade should be put in the same cell.
On what charge by law?
Due entirely to the pernicious doctrines of the liberal far left
Entirely? Methinks you doth complain too much… (Thanks to Shakespeare for literary guidance)