Once again, where are YOUR official Serbian combat records?
Check the serbian air force webpage simple like that.
look something beyond ENGLISH because i guess you only speak English you only will check pages from CNN or ABC
Enough about the F-117 shot in Serbia.
The truth is…I shot it down!!! With my slingshot. No SA-3…no MiG-29…it was meeeee. Can we please move over… ?
So…let me draw the conclusion to this:
MiG-29 a very good plane…good potential…my own favourite
Combat record? Poor…almost non-existent…I say this with great pain in my heart, but the truth is the truth…I accept it.Why this poor combat record?
Untrained pilots, overwhelming odds and old avionics.And I, in just few sentences, solved the entire issue.
The MiG-29 has not a poor combat record, it has shot down aircraft Tornadoes, MiG-29s, Su-22, Su-27 and a claimed F-117.
9:0 is perfectly fine, thank you. We’ll take that over 50:1 any day of the week.
NATO bias? Please, I don’t think NATO or the US should have even been involved. Anyway where are YOUR official Serbian combat records?
Krasnaya Zveda and Udarnaja Sila are enough and you can check several serb hosted webpages the numbers do not add up with the West.
50:0 yes you are right there were 50 F-16 against 2 MiG-29s in Kosovo, by the way war is not a football match.
4 MiG-29s for a F-117 not a bad trade for the MiG-29 😀
Whatever. The fact remains that Gordon is wrong. No MiG-29 shot down an F-117A. In combat against Western aircraft, the MiG-29 has been nothing more than cannon fodder. Even other Russian made aircraft have been able to destroy it without a problem.
Perhaps SOC perhaps Gordon is wrong, but at least in Russia and In Serbia NATO is not the 2:0 score, by the way the MiG-29 has only a 9:0 agaisnt western fighters, that is not amazing since you had AWACS and large armadas of NATO fighters,nothing special to bragg.
To me honestly the MiG-29`s F-117 kill is unclear time will tell, let`s leave the Serbian case closed, becasue i know you are NATO bias and you do not show me any official serbian combat record
regards.
So are you saying they shot down a B-2? And you wanted me to show you a Serbian source claiming a SAM got the F-117. There it is.
That’s because they shot down a grand total of two fast jet combat aircraft. They might have gotten some drones, some airborne decoys, some cruise missiles, and some chaff clouds as well, but insofar as combat aircraft are concerned, there was an F-16 downed and an F-117. And maybe a Mirage, but I might be confusing that with a mid-90’s loss. Anyway, Serbia can claim whatever they want. Let’s see them prove it.
Hehehehe
SOC you say Serbia can claim what ever it wants well NATO can claim what ever they want but also they do propaganda and unless you give me Serbain official sources for the number of kills i will just think you are giving me only western versions.
Regards
The burden of proof in that regard is on the Serbians. If they’re claiming to have shot down X number of aircraft, let’s see them actually prove it.
Why are you so intent on believing a third-party source when a Serbian military officer has given you different information? And did you not read the bit in the second link about the “MiG-29 pilot’s” name?
Because they’re either propagandists, or they are delusional.
No. They’d know that the dot on the radar was hit by a missile. That dot could have been chaff, a decoy, an ECM interference, or an aircraft. They’d have to conduct an analysis of wreckage to determine if they actually downed an aircraft.
No. Would not the Serbians provide evidence of more than one F-117 shot down if they actually happened?
No, for anyone to completely disprove any of these idiotic claims of multiple F-117s or B-2s being shot down, all you need to do is check with either the START treaty office in the case of the B-2, or any number of sources who track serial numbers. Or hell, for that matter, go to Holloman and look for yourself and see how many F-117s are around.
So a SAM missile battery commander from Serbia is not good enough of an official source for you?
The problem with your claims is that Gordon himself is only saying that one F-117 was shot down.
It makes me laugh, Depending in the Serbian you either call them liars or honest, only what goes along with NATO`s version you call it true and a truthful evidence.
I think let`s leave it here SOC, i do not think you will address the 38 NATO aircraft that Serbia claims as shot down.
I also know you can not get Krasnaya Zveda`s issue where they talk about the MiG-29`s F-117 kill and medal award, niether you can disprove Krasnaya Zveda. You just will continue giving me Western links to a Western version.
Serbia Officially does not acknowledges 2 NATO aircraft as shot down.
But i will be honest I only have at the moment UDARNAJA SILA`S version of the MiG-29`s F-117 kill.
Ok. I figured that since this involved Yefim Gordon, a book, and the MiG-29, the source was probably in here somewhere. And I found it in about thirty seconds on my very warped bookshelf. The information comes from his Airlife book, Mikoyan MiG-29 Fulcrum, ISBN 1-84037-028-9, printed in 1999. The bit in question comes from page 122.
Now. What Gordon is alleging is that the F-117A shot down, which he lists as serial 82-0806, was shot down by a MiG-29 piloted by one Lt. Col. Gvozden Djukic. It is important to first note one critical piece of information: F-117A #82-0806 is the exact same airframe that the USAF has publicly admitted was lost. We are talking about a single F-117A loss, and not more than one aircraft.
So, Gordon alleges that the jet was first thought to be shot down by a Kvadrat SAM (he incorrectly gives the NATO name as SA-4 Ganef, when in fact the Kvadrat is the SA-6 GAINFUL, and he, like damn near every author, fails to capitalize the codename). Then he references a Krasnaya Zveda article claiming that it was actually downed by a MiG-29.
Now, do you want a Serbian official to dispute that allegation made by the Russian press that a MiG-29 shot down the F-117? Why, here you go:
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1251584&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds031
Here’s another version of the exact same story, which gives the name “Gvozden Djukic” as an alias of Col. Dani Zoltan, the air defense commander in charge of the S-125 (SA-3 GOA) unit that actually did shoot down the F-117A:
http://www.edefenseonline.com/?func=article&aref=11_09_2005_OM
So feel free to keep thinking a MiG-29 downed an F-117A, or that more than one was shot down over Serbia. You’ll be wrong, though.
SOC
Okay let`s suppose you got wrong Yefim Gordon in the Serial, the other question you still can not address is this were more aircraft shot down by the Serbians.
Is Udarnaja Sila getting the same information from Gordon? did Krasnaya Zveda got the report of the MiG-29 from a real ceremony where Milosevic awarded the medal to a MiG-29 pilot?
Why the Serb Defence ministry claims in 2005, thirty eight NATO aircraft shot down?
Why they say the painted with their radar the NATO aircraft shot down, would not they know in their radarscope if their SAM were succesful shooting down the NATO aircraft.
Would not the US only release one serial number of the three F-117 shot down?
Undoutedly for a Historian needs not only the US or western Sources you need Krasnaya Zveda`s documents were they claim the MiG-29 kill, the Serbian source that has Milosevic awarding a MiG-29 pilot and not a SAM operator named Danii.
Believe me without any Serbian and official claim matching the NATO score and without a extract from the MiG-29 award is hard to know detailed information.
Gordon seems to be wrong in the serial and in that you are right, however other sources claim a total of three F-117 shot down releasing only one serial number is not proof others were not shot down.
The thing is,no one can proove anything as of yet. The only thing we can do is draw conclusions from the data available.
If our Mig-29s had radars that were functioning properly and if other crucial systems were operational,then they might have(i repeat might) have at least stood a better chance then being shot out of the sky without even acquiring enemy.
If Russians knew that exporting downgraded Migs would damage the reputation of their aviation industry,i think they would have changed their export policy.In that way,they also were unable to test how their own versions of Migs for example would perform in combat with modern western fighters,as the downgraded versions performed poorly.
Who knows how the Russian made airplanes would have performed during Operation Desert Storm,if they havent defected to Iran :confused:
Thanks, i see your point but i wonder is there any evidence of what Russia or Gordon Claims in any Serbian document, news paper or video?
I mean officially, no insult but only your words for accurate evidence is hardly a Historical proof.
But i agree i also do not have evidence to sustain Udarnaja Sila`s or Gordon statements beyond telling what you what they do claim, but i do believe you might have some evidence that perhaps in one way is conclusive, have you?
If Krasnaya Zvezda has photos of F-117 being shot down by Mig-29 and Gvozden getting a medal for doing that,then CNN must have the video of Milosevic ordering ethnic cleansing. :rolleyes:
Just leave the topic Flogger,it was discussed many times before.You can search the forum and find topics that discuss how many airplanes have(have not) been shot down etc.
Even us Serbs,know that unfortenutely not more than 2 airplanes were shot down.However,more were likely damaged.
Okay i leave the Topic because beyond some sources i have read or watched i can not prove more for the moment and considering your first hand experience well is hard to sustain, the argument.
Consider that i believe your words as a fellow forum member with this i give as closed and settled the F-117 loss by a MiG-29 in Serb service for the moment.
As historical evidence you have not proved anything and hardly i can say you have disproved Krasnaya Zveda with only your word, but also i can not prove it, if it is authentic what Gordon claims as a fact.
For the moment i can not say more, thanks for your nice opinions both of you.
Regards
Then it was a FULCRUM and not an SA-3 that got one, because only one has been lost in combat.
It wasn’t a stopgap, it was chosen over the F-20 to equip ANG interceptor units. The AN/APG-66(V)1 radar offers a CW illuminator for the AIM-7 as well as AIM-120 capability. 241 were converted from F-16As. And so what if it wasn’t exported?
What lame way of proving something.
Check this, According to Yefim Gordon, the Russian daily Krasnaya Zveda (Red Star) reported that Mister Gvozden spoted visually the F-117 and fire an AA-11 Archer from his MiG-29.
He goes into say Slobodan Milosevic awarded the medal, first prove Gordon wrong, how you can prove him wrong? Krasnaya Zveda must have that statement, probably pictures, Milosevic`s award to Gvozden must have a report not only in Russia but also in Serbia, if he really awarded the medal and if there is photo evidence in Serbia or Russia and media and offical acknowledgement this proves Gordon righ, if not well he is wrong.
But that is even easier if you get a Serbian offical statement saying no Serbian MiG-29 shot down an F-117.
But you always pick the right sources to find whatever claim you do. Your special friends Yefim Gordon are very helpful in that.
There are often ways of at least guessing the truth-content of a source. Russian TV from the night of the shot-down has a very limited “truth-content”.
No you are very wrong, i do give credibility to all sources, the Russian TV is as credible as here some forum members or NATO official reports.
The best and most reliable of them all is the Serbian Defence Ministry, the Serbian arm forces and the Serbian Air Force, If offically the Serbian Air Force says there was not F-117 shot down by a Serbian MiG-29 well, mister Yefim Gordon or Udarnaja Sila are totally proven wrong.
But believe a western source for what officially says the Serbian Air Force without any Serbian official statement is totally wrong, honestly i won`t believe such source.
IMHO the MiG-29`s kill of an F-117 is likely, not a fact yet, however it is not unlikely, it is just probable.
up to what i know many Russian sources say it was a fact, it was true a MiG-29 Shot down a F-117 even a Russian TV program with MAPO`s collaboration and Valery Menitsky`s statements says that.
According to Yefim Gordon, Milosevic awarded a medal to a MiG-29 pilot, i do not believe that crap of the changed name, but he says the MiG-29 pilot was awarded and therefore therefore must be an evidence of such event and i doubt there was not the mention of the MiG-29 shooting of the F-117 while awarding the Pilot for such feat
In few words either Milosevic awarded a MiG-29 pilot a medal for shooting down a F-117 or simply he did not.
Wouldn’t that be the MiG-29 made in ’92?
(i know i’m a devil’s advocate here but still :p )If any were actually made in that year, the early 1990s were absolutely disasterous when it comes to former-Soviet aircraft production. I’m pretty sure no -29s were delivered from Lukhovitsy that year (haven’t got my figures at hand), so whatever 1992 MiG-29s might have been made would have been from the OKB workshop.
Flogger,
Listen to the sensible Serbs here. Although their level of knowledge obviously is minuscule compared to a DeAgostini video tape.
Arthur
I do listen and i see first hand experiences i do believe them but i also see they have different accounts both agree in one fact no MiG-29`s kills, but i always said as a Westen acknowledged and video proven only one F-117 was shot down.
what i can see is there are many different accounts.
I do believe very likely there was not a MiG-29`s kill of an F-117, 100% sure well i am not only if the Serbian Ministry of Defence claims it i will totally agree there was no MiG-29`s kill of an F-117 but at least for some Historians there was an F-117 shot down by a MiG-29.
It is interesting because according to some Russian sources even TV programs there was one F-117 shot down by a MiG-29.
Of course like in any war there are disinformation exercises and denials of losses by both warring factions.
Also there is a common agreement there were more than 2 NATO aircraft shot down and around 5-3 MiG-29 lost by Serbia.
I do not think there is a total supremacy of the F-15 or F-16 over the MiG-29.
About the Iraqi MiG-29s i have read they have some kills claimed, in Cuban service they have also shot down aircraft of course civil but they have a kill any way.
Also in Russian service up to what i know.
In General i do not believe any warring faction because all exagerate and lie, a good historian must take all sources and make a general idea what did happen if he was not witness to the event.
trust one source even a witness one is also foolish because many witnesses also have different acounts even witnessing the same event.
That’s funny, it was reported in the Western press as early as the 28th of March. That’d be the day after it was lost. Serbia showed pictures of the wreckage on local TV almost immediately (which is damned funny, in that they never managed to produce video evidence of OTHER claimed kills…). NATO acknowledged the loss only after six hours or so had passed. Now why, I wonder, would they do that? Because they wanted to get the pilot to safety first, genius. If they had stated that a jet went down in a given area, that’d key in the Serbians on where to look for the pilot.
SOC
This is the worst explanation you have given me, first the Serbs knew at any time the Pilots`s whereabouts, Why? simply to launch a SAM or AAM you need to feed information to the missile`s computers, The Serbs knew the exact position where the F-117 was shot down, that is a fact because if it was a SAM they knew where it was flying and when the F-117 was in range, same would be a MiG-29 specially if the MiG pilot has visual identification of the F-117.
What the Serbs did not know is where the Pilot was wandering exactly, it was a matter of time and luck, happily for the US rescue team the Pilot was rescued before being capture.
the Serbs knew of course the pilot was hiding and in a small area, and in any news network they will not say the exact position.
The real reason the NATO denied the F-117 shot down is political the dammed aircraft is too expensive and a Primitive SAM-3 shot it down or MiG-29 shot it shows simply all the million dollars invested in that jet are worthless since a second rate air force humilliated all the US high tech
What they were hoping is the Serbs did not have any evidence at all that is the reason they denied the whole incident
Super Flanker: Su-35
Super Hornet: F-18E/F
Super Tomcat: modified F-14D proposalGiven that only two of those aircraft exist, this should really be between the Su-35 and the F-18E/F, right?
Not necesarily the F-14B was called Super Tomcat, what you are confusing is Super Tomcat 21 with the Super tomcat F-14B/D
The F-14D was considered Super Tomcat early in it`s carrier
here is the Proof
The reason that Serbian claims can be discounted or at the very least seriously scrutinized in this instance is that they did, after all, lie to the world and claim that they downed a B-2. Oops. But I guess we should consider them to be honest and forthright sources, right?
So who’s lying? Russia or Serbia? Because either an S-125 got the F-117, or a MiG-29 did.
Once again, you have no idea what you’re talking about. Have you ever been with the US military in a combat zone? No? Because I have. And yes, you still train in a war zone. ESPECIALLY in a war zone. And most of the time, you are doing it before the outset of hostilities. Do you think all of the Coalition aircraft, for example, sat on the runway when they arrived in Saudi Arabia, waiting for the war to start on January 17th, 1991? Uh, no. They were flying a lot. But if there was no war, what sort of missions would they have been flying? I wonder… But oh no, I screwed up, I went and used the term “war”. We certainly don’t want martinez getting irritated because the conflict doesn’t involve his definition of “war” :rolleyes:
hehehehe
So all the losses are from training no cover ups so if they are so forth Coming why first deny the F-117 when Serbia claimed the Victory? they should be the first to say we lost it ah! but was until the Serb showed the F-117 wreckage on TV that they had to addmit yes we lost the F-117.
When Serbia has said only we shot down 2 NATO aircraft?
No western Nation wants to alarm their population about war, so they never will release truthful 100% statements all the time.
because as you know it the West claims it has a “free press”.
Undoutedly there is some degree of freedon of speech in the West but it is not perfect.