I think it was when I downloaded the IFDG 321 for FS, it had allsorts of infomation that came with it, so dont blame me. What is the most economical them?

I read a fact also the other day that the 321 is the most economical (seat per mile cost) of any single-aisle aircraft. This could be a reason for the change!

also, what about the charter routes like skiathos?

The only airline that seems to be able to use the 321 well in the uk is BMed. I can see BA doing very well with the 321 and the 757’s will be left out to dry.

what happened with the crash?

Yes, I agree. ZB must have a small market for the GIB flights as they also have AGP an hour down the road. If they are too big for a 320 and 321’s can’t go there, then why not offer x2 DAILY instead of once with a 320. this will give more variation in departures and will benefit ZB hold on the airport. This means that they will be able to carrry 360 people a day, instead of 230. Is this too much capasity, do they need 319’s (?) to fill the gap. GB also fly to GIB and also use 320’s and before that 737’s. From what I know they have never used the 321’s on the route which may also be another indication.

As a side note, how old are the current BA 757’s? As some of the last to leave went to FCA, could these be refitted and bought by ZB. Its just an idea, as ZB really need extra aircraft to expand.

yeah, some of the 757’s are 20 years old nearly and thats near the same age as some Ryanair 732’s! There has been a logical progreesion in the medium-range medium capasity sector, right from the 707, to the 727, to the 757 and now to the 321. Boeing don’t seen to want to respond to this, where the 738 is too small and the 739 cannot give extra capasity because of the exit doors.

What are flight supps anyway, why do they only apply to some flights? I just dont understand the logic.