Does this mean we are now allowed to promote on here our own items for sale elsewhere.?
Nice photo John.. thanks for posting. Do you have any details about when and where.?
… if it was reported … and the law could be bothered.
And therein lies the problem. Unless your a motorist the law cannot be bothered.!
Thanks for the pics Mark12… it never ceases to amaze me that a decision was never made to preserve at least one of every type of service aircraft by the armed forces. Its clear that the 50’s, 60’s and even the 70’s offered opportunities to ensure a survivor was preserved, even in a dismantled state.
I wonder if the RAF museum, or anyone else for that matter, has approached the owner of the Brigand at Kemble and offered to buy it? Perhaps they have and have been turned away.. but maybe only then could a concerted effort be made to preserve and restore it, and gather together as much as possible of what there is still surviving.. just as DC is doing with the Hornet.?!
What are the chances of dismantling the Defiant, and lining her up on the flight line with the Spitfires, Hurricanes and Gladiators.?
Thanks Mark12 and Bill T for the pics.. please keep them coming.
It isn’t a surprise aircraft id’s get muddled when people can’t spell the owners names – it’s Mr Grey to you 😉
Ah yes.. sorry murlot ;).
Any Hotspur glider projects on the go..
Well not sure it counts as it was neither a rival nor did it actually go into production (only around 15 produced), but the RR Eagle 22 was designed for use with contra-props. Only ever fitted to the Wyvern TF-1 which first flew in 1946, it was a 24 cylinder H block monster rated at around 3200 hp.. but was sadly overtaken by the then new breed of turbo-prop powerplants.
Does make me wonder though that if one of these Reno racing teams unearthed an example that could be made to run, would they have the balls and money to fit it to an airframe.? Wishful thinking i guess..
Pictured is an impressive working model of an Eagle.
Thats the kiddie..!
Good luck with the descent guys.
Incidentally talking of XL319 and not knowing much about her, was she ever ground run / taxied after her arrival at NEAM in the same way as the examples at Southend and Wellesbourne… or has this never been possible?
I know the RR Eagle was a stop gap engine fitted to the Wyvern while the Python was developed.
I have always wondered if it would have been better aircraft, reaching operational use earlier, saving on development, being simpler to maintain, more reliable and possible being produced in larger numbers, if they had stayed with the Eagle for the whole production run.Richard
The answer to at least some of those is probably ‘yes’. But you also have to ask would the navy still want it, as among other things they were actively trying to move away from different aircraft using different types of fuel on board carriers. Although for a time the Wyvern / Seahawk / Sea Venom shared deck room with piston powered AEW Skyraiders, that was more out of necessity rather than choice. It was also a case of Rolls Royce not wanting to put the Eagle into production, as they deemed quite rightly that the way forward was with turbines.. not pistons.
Couldn’t see a Tempest on there, only a Fury. :confused: