Some interesting points guys. I remember a few years back bidding on feebay for an unused Jet Provost canopy that was going to be scrapped if not sold.. i subsequently won it and then had to hire a big enough van and make the trip to Eastleigh to collect it. Through a third party it ended up at Bruntingthorpe for possible use there on an active JP, and the money i received from it just covered my expenses, BUT, it also hopefully helped out a worthy cause.
As said business’ need to make a profit, thats what they are there for… but just sometimes its nice to do something out of sheer enthusiasm and for the love of it.!;)
Just a quick Question, Would the RAFM ever part with any of its exhibits? i mean for the right amount of £££ and possibly an aircraft in return?
(just rather like the idea of an airworthy ME410 alongside Black 6 :diablo: )
Yes they would Ben, just as long as you have a Whirlwind 1 to swap with them.!:D
See post #70.
The Python was designed as a constant speed engine for long range Lincolns etc, but thats where the problem was, because a fighter will go through all kinds of different flight speeds and attitudes necesitating a very flexible engine. But the Python did not like rapid throttle movements of any kind and so yes the prop pitch did change the speed of the aircraft, with obviously the engine controlling the speed of the propellers.
Even though there was an rpm range as such it is said that just like the Gannet, the Wyvern’s engine note didn’t change regardless of the power selected.
Not sure this helps much, but here is a cutaway of the front end of a Wyvern’s Python showing the drive and reduction gears for the contra-props. Both sets of props were constant-speed and of 13′ diameter, driven together and not independently like the Gannet and as such the PCU operated both sets as one, not separately. The propeller control unit acted as a constant-speed unit, controlling propeller pitch to maintain constant rpm under all conditions of power and airspeed. The engine itself ran at 4100 at ground idle and was maintained at 7800 whilst in the air. At take off and combat power the engine speed was maintained at 8000 rpm for a maximum of 10 mins.
Blimey Peter.. i’m surprised any of the other RAF stations had any recruits with rumours like that abounding.!:eek:
Great pictures.
I did much the same at Cosford a couple of years back. Of course, you can overdo that kind of thing….:diablo:
Strewth… the things Cosford do to fit planes into hangars.!:D
For shame, call yourself an enthusiast :diablo: mistaking a radial for a merlin! tisk tisk
Whoops :o. All i can say in my defence was that i had the M11 traffic noise blowing this way as well… so at least i didn’t think it was a Scania..:p
Brian, the ARCO/HFL hangar was open and lit so maybe it emanated from one of their fleet.
I think just two.. only one of which is airworthy.
Great pics Si, thanks for posting. And before anyone asks… no it won’t be at legends.!
@ Manston Airport: With DHA going into administration and them being the maintenance authority, I’ve no idea what the future holds for the Sea Vixen.
Will we see it fly in 2010? I have my doubts, but hope I’m wrong.
I don’t want to hijack this thread, but regarding the Sea Vixen i understand the RNHF are trying to come to an arrangement with the aircrafts owner regarding her future operation.. so fingers crossed.!
Anyone have an annoying mother-in-law to get rid of.?
So, get on with the job, what’s the latest news on the restoration of any of FlyPast’s favourite aircraft (no not the Lancaster).
Cees
What.. you mean the Wyvern cees.?:D:p
I thought her previous owner was the MOD?:confused: