dark light

Wyvernfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,131 through 5,145 (of 5,170 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ejector seats, whats the difference? #1174249
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    In a “nutshell” the Mk1 seat just got you out of the aircraft. Preparation to eject and release of seat was up to the pilot.

    The Mk2 automated the sequence a bit more.

    In detail the Mk1 had a ML attachment to give automatic operation of the safety harness release box. Pilot had to kick clear of the seat to trigger the baro parachute device.

    Early Mk1 seats did not have leg restraining gear but this was later retrofitted.

    Mk.2 provided auto seperation from seat for battle injury/unconsciousness. Leg restraints incorporated.

    Mk.2B had Mk.13A parachute and slots in thigh guards for control locks. No footrests.

    Mk.2E had either Mk.13A or Mk.8A parachute. Fixed thigh guards, no slots.

    Regards
    Ross

    Ross,

    I have a pic of either a Mk.1B or 2B and it shows it with footrests, also the pilots notes states for the pilot to put feet in footrests when preparing to eject. Also it states a Mk.8a parachute pack for the Mk.2B seat.

    The specific differences that i can see are a different headrest pad and drogue container but i cannot be sure.
    Seams like the seats are a minefield of possible differences.

    Rob.

    in reply to: Ejector seats, whats the difference? #1174490
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Thanks for the input Mark. Its really the actual fitting of the seat that concerns me such as the rails it slides down on, but as i don’t have a cockpit to use as a pattern i’m stuck!:confused:

    in reply to: Wyvern's Scrapped at Lossiemouth #1175188
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Lee,

    Have you spoken to anyone that witnessed the pit being filled in, or remembers what was actually in there at around the same time.

    Rob.

    in reply to: Wyvern's Scrapped at Lossiemouth #1175570
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Very interesting pics there Mark 12, did you not note down the serial of the Python Wyvern? Most unlike you!

    Looking at the other pics it is definately an early example as it lacks the distinctive Python cut back engine cowlings – as I said previously both prototypes had crashed by 1952 but maybe one of them was in good enough order to end up at Gosport and in your photo.

    No chance.. VP109 crashed into a hanger at Farnborough through engine failure and VP113 crashed into houses at Yeovil killing the pilot and the residents. The third and final prototype was fitted with the RR Clyde with DH three bladed contra props and had a totally different profile. This is one of the 20 pre-production TF.2’s produced to help develop the airframe and Python engine, although i can find no info on a Python example ending its days at Gosport but like i said my moneys on VW878 or VW879.

    in reply to: Wyvern's Scrapped at Lossiemouth #1175815
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    The Eagle in the FAAM is a real one, albeit sectioned. It used to be at RNAY Fleetlands on display until the Museum took it back along with everything else they had originally placed on loan from their Wroughton store.

    The Gosport dump is well known about – its location, its (supposed) contents and indeed the Royal Engineers some years ago, whilst carrying out some work at HMS Sultan, were asked to scan the area. Their metal detectors went off the scale.

    However, and here is the “BUT”…..the area is on the edge of a nature reserve, is heavily overgrown and Gosport Borough Council are unlikely to want to have diggers move in to start tearing the place apart. There would have to be security overnight, insurance for those working on the area, and then there is the thorny issue of who is responsible for the environmental impact of unearthing any aircraft remains – radioactive hazard from old instruments, oil from engines,asbestos etc.

    Nice idea though it is, it has been looked at before and deemed too difficult. I wouldn’t go asking FAAM again – they simply haven’t got the resources to conduct any recovery like this.

    Thanks for that Lee.

    The TF.2 shown looks so bloody tantalising but without knowing exactly what happened to the airframes before they were buried, i.e were they burned or trashed before burial, and all the problems involved with authorities and logistics, i guess your right in thinking that its a dig too far.
    Can’t help thinking though that if it were Spits or Lancs instead of Wyverns and Fireflies something more positive would have been done by now.

    But as they say, never say never!

    in reply to: Wyvern's Scrapped at Lossiemouth #1176176
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Mark,

    Just to put us both at ease there appears to of been two Wyverns on the dump at Gosport. VR136 which was Eagle powered, and a Python powered pre production prototype possibly VW878 or VW879. Hope this clears up the confusion.

    Rob.:confused:

    in reply to: Wyvern's Scrapped at Lossiemouth #1176196
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    VR136

    VR136 was Eagle powered, this is a Python powered TF2 prototype!

    in reply to: Wyvern's Scrapped at Lossiemouth #1176213
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Judgeing by the tail unit this is an early TF2 without dihedral or the distinctive fins. I can only assume it is either VW878 or VW879 but can anyone be more precise?

    in reply to: Canberra crash Crewkerne 60's/70's? #1181681
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Just to put the record straight,the pilot was Capitaine Jean Depui,French Air Force,who was doing his solo `asymmetric handling` exercise,perhaps one of the most dangerous exercises to do,but necessary.I think Jean was a fast-jet pilot,probably Ouragan,Mystere,Mirage.A timely,sobering reminder of the times we all sat in class,struggling with abtruse aerodynamics,and calculus,and `flute-music` formulae …..Syc
    We were students….

    Hi Sycamore, thank you for that, just out of interest were you on the same course as the pilot or do you have any other connection with him?

    in reply to: Canberra crash Crewkerne 60's/70's? #1182216
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Many thanks guys. I shall pass all this on to the eye witness, i’m sure it will be of some interest to him.

    Incidentally he too was at school at the time of the incident and told me that the owner of the said petrol station was badly burned but is still alive today. Makes you wonder how close it actually came to his premises or whether he was involved in some sort of rescue attempt!

    in reply to: Albemarle, another extinct beast #1182232
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    It did indeed have a tail bumper wheel, but can’t be classed as a tail wheel, especially as the one thing the Albemarle was famous for was being nose wheel equiped!

    The only useful thing (ish) I can add here is that I have a picture showing about 10 Albemarles being scrapped at St Athan c.1946

    If its a wheel attached to the tail, does that not make it a tail wheel????? Can’t quite see the funny bit but give it time.

    in reply to: Albemarle, another extinct beast #1182850
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    I sold two Albemarle tail wheels on Ebay last year, can’t remember where they went to, but every little helps!

    in reply to: Gannet XL500 flies #1185281
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    ABSOLUTELY BL**DY BRILLIANT! At last another piece of FAA hardware will be taking to the skies. I appreciate all vintage aircraft that still fly but why are there so few ex Royal Navy machines still airworthy. It seems that the RAF and USAAF are always better represented at airshows than the Navy, and it would seem in such thnigs like aviation art as well. Hopefully in time this will be evened up a little more. Gook Luck guys!:):cool:

    in reply to: Sea Vixen XP924 At Odiham #1187023
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Great photos thanks. I never cease to be amazed by this fascinating and powerful piece of naval hardware and my thanks go out to all who have a hand in keeping her airworthy… Now if we could just get a Buccaneer and Scimitar on each wingtip…

    in reply to: Unbelievable…. #1189145
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Yeah happy birthday moggy, whoever you are!

Viewing 15 posts - 5,131 through 5,145 (of 5,170 total)