The bit after the clip where they decide to turn for home has stuck with me since I was a young lad in the mid sixties.
The sight of the trails as posted above, then they sweep into the turn…very impressionable
I wonder how many latter day pilots got their first inspiration from this film.
Very much a compempory promotion, it does stand as a marvellous record of those days.
Odd thread title given that 12 o’Clock High was a different film as linked above. This was called “Strategic Air Command”
Some preserved by Dan Air were lost over the years
The Dakota than went on to Disneyland Paris then was sold on for use as a film set and ended up as a burned wreck.
There was also Comet 4 (G-APDK?) that was donated to the Air Scouts as a swap for the York Dan Air wanted back.
Another act of sheer vandalism was the Herald at Bournemouth.
What happened to the fin/rudder of the Hermes that was at Gatwick for many years before going to Duxford?
RE The OP
The Ghana DC 10 is 9G-ANB
The Concorde is a full scale replica and was no part of the project…i.e. it was not a mock up.
All the talk about letter and number allocations but is there any reason not to mix
Apart from the countries mentioned earlier, (USA, China, Japan or former Soviet States) plus South Korea and many countries for microlights , there is also Saudi that uses a mixture and Latvia which uses a mixture for microlights and even the UK and France that used mixed on the Concordes.
Just because it’s not normally done doesn’t seem to mean it can’t be??.:confused:
Returning to Latvia, in the summer I was confused trying to identify a micolight. It was Profi YL-I11, that is “i” one one:stupid:
G-PLAY didn’t appear for a little while. Around now.
The NAMC YS-11 is basically a Japanese built HS.748
Three from LHR in the early nineties
The IL-76T means it has a Turret.
The IL-76TD is Turret Deleted
The LET 410 used the front end of the F-27 Friendship…I know, they are nothing alike, but to some and others who believe anything.
Early jet aircraft were noisy.
Reality…it was the engines not the aircraft, we hear how noisy the One-eleven, and Trident were for example, but, it was their RR Speys. No one ever seemed to complaining about RR disturbing their peace. The aircraft took all the blame.
They only used what was availiable at the time.
The HS Trident was notorious for it’s reluctance to leave the ground on take off….
Reality…no Trident ever overran a runway for this reason and in fact it’s take off performance was fairly normal for the time.
DH Comets also had similar, but they called them pinnion tanks
No, the Comet 4/4C had pinion tanks built into the wing
The Viscounts slipper tanks were easily removable tanks to be fitted or removed as and when needed. They were designed to be temporary.
In latter days they were not seen in airline as the type had been regalter to shorter routes.
In the early days there were many instances of use on longer rages. As mention Icelandair and British United flew with them. TAA did as well.
BUA and it’s predessors flew routes from Lonodon down through Africa.
The RAE Viscounts had them, …XT575/XT661
Keeping something alive is the best form of preservation.
Machines soon deteriorate when not powered up.
Yes EAA…this was 5H-MOG
Thanks for the comparison.
Looks like the nose gear is well compressed supporting the heavy loaded theory.
Even in what some might think a straight forwards shot there can always be something of interest or out of the ordinary.
Thanks for sharing all these pics