dark light

garryrussell

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 707 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A380 Pilot controls #509814
    garryrussell
    Participant

    I imagine I would too…seems better to have something in front of you to fold with two hands

    The Captain is flying left handed and I can’t imagine that being comfortable.

    But it seems it’s OK as we don’t hear about it.

    in reply to: A380 Pilot controls #509845
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Not the early ones A.300/310…they had conventional yokes.

    in reply to: 'Just' a 727 at Southend… #440968
    garryrussell
    Participant

    G-ORSA? Not listed with the CAA?

    Maybe not officially registered yet

    Take a look at some of the airlines currently being tested BA 787, A.380 for example, they are not listed on G-INFO

    Only when it’s delivered and I suspect the paperwork is finally signed does it become official and then it will appear.

    Old registrations that were issued but not taken up are not listed either, or at least I’ve not yet found one that was.

    in reply to: Boeing 737 MAX #510061
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Also launched at the Paris airshow, however I’m not sure if there is a flying model. Does anyone know?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9cHVxUwTu4

    Well no, if is being launched it doesn’t exist yet so there won’t be a flying model

    Under developent

    in reply to: Egyptair B.777 diverted to Prestwick. #510287
    garryrussell
    Participant

    How do you know they are the people at the centre of the event

    The ‘plane had to land, was search and five people did not get back on…

    That is all that has been reported.

    There is no implication they wrote the note.

    in reply to: Did the VLJs just come and go ? #510430
    garryrussell
    Participant

    How do you fit all the flight controls, nav gear, aircon units etc. in such a small space and have something that’s possible to service.

    Still don’t see how it’s easy to get in and out of. People when they get older get still and often larger.

    A so many in a small cramped space…toilets??

    What about getting out quick in an emergency.

    Where does the baggage go?

    I just can’t see a use for a jet this small.

    in reply to: Did the VLJs just come and go ? #510490
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Many who use bizjets…most probably, want size and space.

    I can’t imagine anyone wanting to be squeezed into that

    Small jets like the Phenom are about the smallest practical size.

    A single engine also limits over water use…engines till can and do fail

    in reply to: A.380 for Air Zimbabwe? #510494
    garryrussell
    Participant

    F-HPJI is not being taken by AFR with an un annouced redeployment.

    in reply to: First UK Boeing 787 Delivered #510497
    garryrussell
    Participant

    G-TUIC now delivered so perhaps a few ad hoc services are very close now

    in reply to: A350 first flight 14th June #510501
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Congratulation Airbus.

    No longer just a project but a real aeroplane.

    in reply to: A.380 for Air Zimbabwe? #510507
    garryrussell
    Participant

    The mentioned A.320 is ex M-YWAT and originally with Air Jamaica and a few other but never French

    As for the 380, I guess it would be something along the lines of other Arfican airlines using SAA 747SP on leasein the past.

    A bit big to be taking on so it will surely be operated for them with perhaps their own crew eventually.

    If it was Air France, they are about to take on another 380 so perhaps they can spare one in the short term??

    in reply to: A350 Paint job completed #510508
    garryrussell
    Participant

    The black paint around the flightdeck windows does a grand job of hiding the ugly lines that come from marrying the whalejet windows to this new frame.

    The flight deck windows seem to different to the 380

    in reply to: New runway at Heathrow, now! #510674
    garryrussell
    Participant

    They’ve been relaying and repositioning Guernsey’s runway overnight for a couple of years. Of course Heathrow is OK as it does have another runway. In Guernsey’s case some delayed flight had to be cancelled as the RW closed at 21:00. They had to close the whole airport of four sets of two days at critical times.

    Also rebuilding aprons has caused special arrangements having to be made, changing frequently as work progressed.

    Good job but not quite as risky as it would be at any single runway airport which made the comment about aircraft already on the way needed to use it a little odd as there is an alternate runway, a nuisance though it may be.

    Not putting the story down, or not meaning to…it is a big job and as a good example of excellent planning, it is good news, it’s just that everything LHR does is clever and major news and anywhere else is not very newsworthy.

    in reply to: Can I tie up a reg number to a flight number? #510691
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Hope all goes well

    Later you can replay the flight for about a month.

    So you can show her when she gets back.

    I recently went Gatwick-Helsinki and return and afterwards I could look at the track to see exactly what I’d seen from the window.

    in reply to: Can I tie up a reg number to a flight number? #510699
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Look here and you should see it.

    http://www.flightradar24.com/

    Check the settings so it shows reg as well as number but the FR number might be different to the RYR number shown on the map it will show the FR number if you click on it….a side pane will come up with details.

    You can then follow the flight if you want.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 707 total)