dark light

garryrussell

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 707 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lion Air 737 overshoots runway at Bali #514123
    garryrussell
    Participant

    At present the reg is shown as PK-LKS?…that is, unconfirmed.

    in reply to: Construction on Airbus Mobile begins #514364
    garryrussell
    Participant

    All it takes is the will to do it

    That was something the British excelled at a century ago…but now…sell out to the best personal option.Where there’s a will there’s a way…or the UK equivalent…no will so no way.:(

    I wish that wew a joke, or even a tongue in cheek coment…sadly it’s reality and that hurts.

    in reply to: Construction on Airbus Mobile begins #514591
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Why not the UK??…OK it’s to place facilities in other parts of the World, but the UK is never considered for such things so it seems.

    in reply to: Condition of Kingfisher frames #514655
    garryrussell
    Participant

    It says in the linked article

    “These lessors have discovered that aircraft parts have been so badly cannibalized that it is very difficult to restore the planes. In its last few months of operation (KFA stopped flying from October 1, 2012), the airline kept taking parts from its fleet to keep a handful of planes airworthy. Now the planes have been ravaged beyond repair and they can’t fly,”

    in reply to: New Bond AW139 G-VINC @ Norwich ! #442430
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Smart…I just answered another thread on this subject

    in reply to: G-VINC Bond's latest AW139..NWI… #442437
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Looks very smart…thanks for sharing

    What’s the gen on the titleless KLM 737 in the background??

    in reply to: General Discussion #238441
    garryrussell
    Participant

    One can understand if a particular leader was current and then resigns that could be a cause of relief or celebration for some.

    But this is the life of a human being we are talking about and despite the political angle, she was a person with family and friends.

    She retired a long time ago from politics where a week is a long time.

    Her passing is not something worthy of the above oft referred to comment.

    Personally, politically I think she was a disaster, but that is my view from my position.

    I would not wish illness of harm on anyone and I do respect that, despite here not in tune with my thinking, she was one who knew here own mind and would not we swayed. She did what she did not to be popular but because she believed to be right.

    That sort of strength is what is needed now and not the quick fire changes done just to please voters.

    So yes, I did not like her politics, but I admired her strength and fortitude.

    In that respect she was a good leader, the only debate is really which direction she led…but that has no real place in the news of her passing.

    RIP.

    in reply to: The Baroness Thatcher thread #1838619
    garryrussell
    Participant

    One can understand if a particular leader was current and then resigns that could be a cause of relief or celebration for some.

    But this is the life of a human being we are talking about and despite the political angle, she was a person with family and friends.

    She retired a long time ago from politics where a week is a long time.

    Her passing is not something worthy of the above oft referred to comment.

    Personally, politically I think she was a disaster, but that is my view from my position.

    I would not wish illness of harm on anyone and I do respect that, despite here not in tune with my thinking, she was one who knew here own mind and would not we swayed. She did what she did not to be popular but because she believed to be right.

    That sort of strength is what is needed now and not the quick fire changes done just to please voters.

    So yes, I did not like her politics, but I admired her strength and fortitude.

    In that respect she was a good leader, the only debate is really which direction she led…but that has no real place in the news of her passing.

    RIP.

    in reply to: 787 back in the air #514850
    garryrussell
    Participant

    I was ready a piece about this on a Boeing site last night.

    Looks good, awaiting the FAA and ready to meet anything else they may ask but very hopeful all will be acceptable as is to get the project back up and running fully.

    Another flight was recently made to confirm everything was a s expected.

    in reply to: How badly damaged is the Boeing Brand?! #514856
    garryrussell
    Participant

    There is no reason as to why Boeing’s reputation will be damaged

    OK, a revolutionary aeroplane has problems but that can be expected when new frontiers are croossed.

    People are too quick to jump on the doom and gloom.

    British Airways, just this last week, has converted 18 options for the 787 into firm orders for delivery 20-17-21.

    So they are happy and in the longer term all the problems will have been ironed out.

    Lead customers often get discounts for being the first on an untried type.

    Some airlines hang back and wait for the ‘B’ model…that’s how it’s always been and always will be

    Boeing did make one enormous blunder. That was to launch a project into the untried and at the same time guarantee a timescale…how foolish.

    But any customer with an ounce of common sense would not have fallen for that one, even if they did use the fact to try and get a penalty. If an airline does order a new type without a contingency plan, that’s their look out.

    in reply to: Identifying an overflying aircraft at night #515074
    garryrussell
    Participant

    At night, when it’s quiet, a TP can make quite a buzz when it’s just the deep prop noise heard.

    Only two of the Atlantic ATP’s has Mode S so perhaps if it is an ATP and one of those two is used you’ll get to know

    Most of the night freight aircraft and in fact almost all the older jets and TP won’t show on the radar trackers and they don’t have the box.

    in reply to: A new Jet2 for You ! #442499
    garryrussell
    Participant

    In service Saturday 6th April 2013

    in reply to: London Airport circa 1953 #942377
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Great pics

    There was a tendency in those days to call some aircraft by their BEA/BOAC class names. Another is the BEA pax mod to the Dakota that led to those machines being referred to as Pionairs even after sale.

    Argonaught is also not the name of the aircraft, it’s just a Canadair C-4 known as a Canadair Four, but we all affectionately called it Argonaught, in that case it didn’t have a name as such (well Canadair Four) and the Brits always liked a propper name.

    in reply to: Breaking News: IAG could order A350's this week #515331
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Why would BA have a good deal on the787
    Theirs have not been delayed yet and since aircraft on the line will
    incorprate any mods, may not be.

    in reply to: Will these engines replace jets in future? #515923
    garryrussell
    Participant

    An MD-80 and a 727 both flew with an installation one side.

    As mentioned above it was more efficient in many way but annoyingly noisy.

    Not just in a decibel sense, the type and pitch of the noise was very irritating.

    The Optica used a ducted fan and had an irritating buzz and an Islander flew with a pair of ducted fans. Again, like the open ‘Propfan’ the ducted fan was irritatingly noisy.

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 707 total)