dark light

garryrussell

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 707 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RAF gets new Globmaster #2301677
    garryrussell
    Participant

    The RAF had to cover all wear and tear in service and pay for hours flown and at the end restore it to basically a new aircraft

    If reported correctly at the time it looked a right stitch up.

    I was more than glad when they converted to purchase.

    Not sure why they are taking so long building strength, the RAF either need ten or don’t

    Perhaps they put a few quid in a big Piggy Bank now and then until they’ve saved up for another one:p

    in reply to: MH434 Spitfire Decals #220138
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Very nice;)

    Why are you calling it MH434 which, while it was G-ASJV it wasn’t:confused:

    in reply to: Passengers intentionally disturbing center of gravity #541734
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Thanks Gary.

    But as mentioned throughout the thread pax distribution is much more crucial on a small aeroplane and certainly than many running aft would put it out of balance quite suddenly..perhaps the suddenness bring more of a factor than the CG as trying to hold a shift is one thing, trying to bring it back from an over shift beyond limits before the crew realise what’s happening is something else.

    Sort of a Hollywood story you’d never credit as possible in real life, but the extraordinary does happen from time to time.

    in reply to: Shackleton Question #1017323
    garryrussell
    Participant

    113th made in 1949 seems likely, simple codes like that were often used in those days

    in reply to: Passengers intentionally disturbing center of gravity #541743
    garryrussell
    Participant

    It must be really famous as I’ve not heard about it???

    in reply to: RAF gets new Globmaster #2301880
    garryrussell
    Participant

    It’s as well the leases were bought out as end of lease conditions involved virtually returning the aircraft to a new condition before handback.

    in reply to: Colours on a Plane (Or Three) #541904
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Modern aviation has produced not many, but very few types and all sell better before they are flying than was the case years ago.

    In fact many ‘new’ types are developments of types that have been around for many years.

    Because they are developments, they have a wide existing customer base potentially wanting to continue with the new version.

    This seems to be an attempt to create a negative story where no such story exists.

    in reply to: Airbus A380 At 50 #542151
    garryrussell
    Participant

    A cost of $260M or about $100M less that the price of a single aeroplane so not as big a hit proportionally as it would seem.

    Most ground breaking designs and some conventional ones have not made money for a very long time.

    This sort of setback can be quite normal

    Has the World forgotten the 747 early engine issues and flap sections coming off plus the difficult in filling them when first in service…it got through all that fine

    The 380 will come through all this and be a better aeroplane for it.

    in reply to: Passengers intentionally disturbing center of gravity #542371
    garryrussell
    Participant

    I was on a Jump seat of an F.27 Friendship and the captain pointed out the slight trim adjustments the co pilot was making as the girls walked up and down the aisle with a trolley

    Obviously in level flight it is balanced and any shift in eight will have an effect which my be negotiable.

    With the heavy groups of pax in certain area… larger jets can fly fine with an extra engine under one wing so the pax question would fall within the normal range of adjustable trim

    On BN Trilanders the judge you weight and assign a seat…you may have seat number two but it could be the sixth seat as they balance it. On the Islanders the pax were weighed.

    On Dart Heralds, if they carried freight they would stop anyone sitting forward of a decided seat row.

    None of this seems to be a problem on larger aircraft but people booking actual seat position does take away form the check in staff the ability to gauge the weight of pax using standard grouping and distribute the weight, but since they allow it it probably isn’t an issue.

    But the Sumo wrestling club all up front and St.Marys infants school all at the back doesn’t seem very balanced on the face of it:D

    in reply to: Superjet down in Indonesia #543476
    garryrussell
    Participant

    The question marks hanging over early crashes of the A.320 never did it any long term harm, nor did the rudder problems of the 737 cause widespread condemnation.

    Reality is, that these sorts of accidents will happen and any changes needed from the findings will be implemented.

    As for this incident it’s too early to even guess a cause.

    The speculative response through the media and internet is likely to do more damage to the type than any issues that may be found. This is similar to the over reporting of 787 and A.380 issues where rumours become ‘fact’ in many peoples minds.

    As mentioned above, the traveller looks at the price and the timings and decides on that alone. The public is not stupid and nor are airlines. They are not going to operate aircraft which are inherently dangerous, not in well regulated countries at least. OK there are going to be individuals in maintenance, on the flight deck or whatever that will bend of break rules and that might cause an accident, but as long as everyone involved does things right then the risk is minimised.

    If it’s a case of an airliner being operated by a dubious outfit then any mechanical or operational problem will occur on whatever aircraft type they operate.

    Locking people away in a sealed tube and sending them at great speeds through the air at height they can not survive at is potentially dangerous, but such is the state of the industry very safe.

    There is sometimes almost a belief that a modern aeroplane can’t break and won’t fly into something it shouldn’t. That’s not possible, lengthening the odds is what it’s all about.

    We pays our money, makes our choice and take the risks. Nothing in life is without risk. That’s just the way it is, sad but true.

    in reply to: Superjet down in Indonesia #543680
    garryrussell
    Participant

    Killing off Tupolev and Illyushin is what successful business is about, it’s simply a case of the others stepping up to the mark or stepping aside.

    That is why there is only one US and one European Manufacturer of large commercial airliners, a ground where so many have trod before.

    in reply to: General Discussion #260878
    garryrussell
    Participant

    I think the quality of the US imports is far better now than it was in the 1970’s

    in reply to: A question for the youngsters #1849778
    garryrussell
    Participant

    I think the quality of the US imports is far better now than it was in the 1970’s

    in reply to: General Discussion #260995
    garryrussell
    Participant

    In the days of Dad’s Army we watch TV, enjoyed it …or not and that was it. OK, a few kids got hurt trying to be Batman but there wasn’t the mass hysteria that programmes like Big Brother get across certain chunks of the community with the attitude that the nastier they are to each other the better it is and they call that entertainment.

    Nowadays people take it far too seriously and look to TV as the answer for everything, it’s taken over

    Couple that with the modern day trend of always trying to get someone for something feeds the Face-book culture of ‘haters’

    Returning to my comment about comedy being basically poking fun at someone else, if I do anything worthy of humorous ridicule, I’m the first to laugh, if it cause a moment of natural comedy, why should I be left out.

    The rest of the group are going to laugh whether I like it or not. Laughing at your own mistakes or puft stupidity gives a few minuets of elation, getting upset because others have laughed causes hours or even days of resentment.

    True, natural comedy is a part of life and a great relief, yet it gets curtailed.

    On the other hand brash personal attacks for no reason are put up as comedy as often championed.

    in reply to: A question for the youngsters #1849837
    garryrussell
    Participant

    In the days of Dad’s Army we watch TV, enjoyed it …or not and that was it. OK, a few kids got hurt trying to be Batman but there wasn’t the mass hysteria that programmes like Big Brother get across certain chunks of the community with the attitude that the nastier they are to each other the better it is and they call that entertainment.

    Nowadays people take it far too seriously and look to TV as the answer for everything, it’s taken over

    Couple that with the modern day trend of always trying to get someone for something feeds the Face-book culture of ‘haters’

    Returning to my comment about comedy being basically poking fun at someone else, if I do anything worthy of humorous ridicule, I’m the first to laugh, if it cause a moment of natural comedy, why should I be left out.

    The rest of the group are going to laugh whether I like it or not. Laughing at your own mistakes or puft stupidity gives a few minuets of elation, getting upset because others have laughed causes hours or even days of resentment.

    True, natural comedy is a part of life and a great relief, yet it gets curtailed.

    On the other hand brash personal attacks for no reason are put up as comedy as often championed.

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 707 total)