I don’t think it was a demonstration of any sort.
There is a heightened state of alert over and above the present nor due to the forthcoming Olympics
A helicopter sent a hijack code and the authorities reacted to that in the way they have been set up and trained to do
It is a simple as that.
The fact the code was sent by mistake is irrelevant.
As I said above…just what were they supposed to do?
Very tragic…my thoughts to those concerned
Confirmed a 737, in fact 737-236 AP-BKC, originally G-BKYI with British Airways
Similar to L7
I rushed into the bathroom early one winter morning, running a bit late and the light bulb blew
Undetered I washed in the dark and only after I felt the burn brushing my teeth did I realised I was using Imac Hair remover cream 😮
Never pays to be in a rush…like the time I grabed by baseball cap and ramed it on my head all in one movement and only then discover the cat had messed it in:(:mad:
Similar to L7
I rushed into the bathroom early one winter morning, running a bit late and the light bulb blew
Undetered I washed in the dark and only after I felt the burn brushing my teeth did I realised I was using Imac Hair remover cream 😮
Never pays to be in a rush…like the time I grabed by baseball cap and ramed it on my head all in one movement and only then discover the cat had messed it in:(:mad:
The Orion was based on an airliner too as was the Argus and Nimrod
The Poseidon much be well modded given the time it’s been on test.
It might still look much like a 747 with bumps but it’s probably as far away from the airline version as the ones mentioned above.
No would-be hi-jacker will advertise his/her presence by squawking emergency. That is inviting an unwelcome response.
John Green
They wouldn’t…the pilot would without the knowledge of the hijackers hopefully.
That’s the idea of squawking a code rather that spouting it across the airwaves on radio
The media and public over reacted, given the code squawked the emergency security response was the correct thing to do.
The very fact that it is perceived that an attack like 911 is not likely to happen possibly makes it more likely to happen simply because it stands a better chance of success if folks think it would never happen so don’t pay too much attention.
To be effective security has to be in place for any event anywhere.
Not nice and certainly not what I wish to see…or pay for, but sadly a necessity of reality nowadays.
The bottom line is…a helicopter squawked “Hijack”…what else were they supposed to do?
Have we mentioned The SARO P.531 Wasp/Scout Prototype at Yeovilton?
The nose of the second prototype Britannia G-ALRX survives.
One of the more recent prototypes stored for preservation is the Boeing 787, one of two of the type already retired.
The 757 prototype is in use as a test platform…seems a recent type but it is 30 years old.
Parts of the first TriStar serve as an exhibit.
I don’t know it it has been mentioned but the prototype Boeing 737 a -130 has been preserved after serving with NASA.
The 17 year old prototype 777 still earns it’s keep
Boeing have done well with the 367-80, 737,747,757,777 all still intact along with the very juvenile but historic 787
The Airbus A.320 prototype still serves, currently testing parts for the NEO. It’s the only A.320-100 still flying although not much will be -100 now.
It wasn’t that long ago that a prototype would often exist for 2-4 years then be scrapped…if it didn’t crash
Some of the current airliner prototypes are a lot older than we think simply because the basic type has remained in production so long.
Sorry..missed that:o
Why did they not used the second runway?…OK it’s normally the taxyway and flights would have been much restricted, but some movement would have been possible.
A.330 G-VSXY I think…that did swalk an emergency about that time
Hello John
the media hype certainly loses the plot
It’s hard to say how serious the authorities took it, perhaps they felt it operationally justified, perhaps they used it to show their force.
I did rile me, as usual with silly things like explaining what a sonic boom was to people who you’d think the end of the World has come just because something goes bang in the sky.
The whole Olympics this in my opinion is a waste of money even without factoring in the security but as I mentioned above perhaps they wanted to justify the existance of their measures.
One thing for sure…if you’re flying and make a simple mistake you could end up in a very serious situation.
The BBC article here explains the possible hijacking due to a wrong code.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-17699357
The sequence of events were backed up by the helicopter pilot
So. the plot was not lost…they were bang on with their reaction
I guess if it had been genuine and it had been flown into a target there would be an outcry that the plot was lost because more was not done.
I’m not talking about those
These are pics in the building and showing the name and published before Titanic sank.
I know the ones you mean…even some used are of the Lusitania, but there are a series of pics in a book I’ve sadly lost now showing Titanic being fitted out and the hull plating does not match the pics of her before launch but does match pics of Olympic.
Some of the labelled parts found that do show Olympic may not be evidence as when Olympic was damaged whilst Titanic was being fitted out, they took some of Titanic’s parts to repair Olympic and some parts labelled Olympic as replacements were fitted to Titanic.
But some parts that seem to indicate Olympic were not damaged in the collision so not replaced. It could have been that some parts for both ships were made at the same time and the wrong part fitted as it would hardly matter.
If I do find the book again, the house is being cleared I’ll scan the pics in and show what I mean.
I’m not talking about those
These are pics in the building and showing the name and published before Titanic sank.
I know the ones you mean…even some used are of the Lusitania, but there are a series of pics in a book I’ve sadly lost now showing Titanic being fitted out and the hull plating does not match the pics of her before launch but does match pics of Olympic.
Some of the labelled parts found that do show Olympic may not be evidence as when Olympic was damaged whilst Titanic was being fitted out, they took some of Titanic’s parts to repair Olympic and some parts labelled Olympic as replacements were fitted to Titanic.
But some parts that seem to indicate Olympic were not damaged in the collision so not replaced. It could have been that some parts for both ships were made at the same time and the wrong part fitted as it would hardly matter.
If I do find the book again, the house is being cleared I’ll scan the pics in and show what I mean.
I noticed years ago the the hull plating on some Titanic pics didn’t match on others, but did match some pics of Olympic
Odd as the name was clear but I always though the pics were probably retouched as often in those days as detail did not always come out and so was painted on.
When I read about the conspiracy theory, suddenly that and other odd facts that were had to understand, seemed to fit together.
The conspiracy theory is the only story that ties all the facts together.
Whether it is true of not, it does seem remarkable close to what the evidence suggests.