dark light

Starfish Prime

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 947 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Starfish Prime
    Participant

    This is exactly what I am talking about.. We got a claim by Iraqi pilot about downing a Tornado.. then we got two Tornadoes lost at that night.. the result: did not happen.. why? because Cooper and a clown named Starfish know it all better.. 🙂

    If it was vice versa and the claim was made by an USAF crew, you would be screaming it all over..

    Which Iraqi pilot? What was his name? Oh… withheld.:eagerness:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2148826
    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    length wise it can maybe squeeze a small missile, but problem is height. you need to fit launchers and other things in the bay too.
    those are ecm pods or something else.

    Depends if the missile is folding fin. Don’t forget there’s supposed to be a new version of the R-73/74 soon. Length wise look at the size of the main bays in relation to it and they fit a Kh-58. I also seem to see a door on the outside of the intake though, could just be for servicing.

    in reply to: General Discussion #263649
    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    a Russia plus China alliance can easily defeat the US.

    Dubious. It definitely can’t beat the whole of NATO and the EU though and China is only made strong by the fact North America and Europe trade with them and create jobs for them, all that can disappear if China’s attitude persists. We can beat them without even firing a bullet. The Soviet Union wasn’t defeated by trading with them and creating jobs for them, and that’s the approach we need to take with China.

    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    Why would the Soviets send inexperienced pilots to Egypt in 1970, it was actually a very important mission set for them? I think the last thing people attribute the Israelis’ success to are the aircrafts’ performance and capabilities.

    The issue we’re dealing with here is the claim that when actual Russian/Soviet hardware is used by Russians/Soviets it suddenly improves several orders of magnitude in deadliness. Sadly though, combat statistics say otherwise.

    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    There was one Iraqi (MiG-29) claim for a Tornado on the first night, AFAIK..

    Unlikely since they were flying below radar. The Scott Speicher shoot down has since been confirmed but no A2A GR.1 shoot down has ever been confirmed after 25 years. So no, didn’t happen.

    Hmmm… let’s see, aircrew: ‘withheld’. Unconfirmed.

    http://www.acig.info/CMS/?option=com_content&task=view&id=37&Itemid=47

    Oh I see they also claimed a B-52G, two F-111Fs and 2 F-15s (1 F-15C + 1 F-15E), well at least 4 of those were never lost at all, and the other was attributed to AAA. See why nobody can believe Arab claims?

    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    By all credible accounts, the Bekaa Valley battle was a walkover. According to the RAND analysis, Syrian aircraft were monitored by RPVs on take off and were constantly tracked by AWACS from the moment they were off the ground. The Mig-23 variants used by Syria differed very little from those used by the Soviets at the time and had the vulnerability of no RWR coverage from their sides.

    Israeli AWACS and F-15s operating as mini-AWACS were directing the Israeli fighters so intercepts would approach from the Syrians’ beam aspect. They often didn’t know they were under attack until they were dead. Their aircraft and weapons were outperformed, their GCI communications were jammed leaving their pilots in a state of disarray and chaos and their enemy was operating AWACS and ELINT assets. Articles and studies on the battle (including those published by the soviets later) concluded that the disparity in situational awareness was by far the major contributing factor in Syria’s (and the Soviet’s) humiliating defeat.

    A better demonstration of Soviet aircraft performance was the Rimon 20 air battle. 12 Israeli Mirage IIIC and 4 F-4, outnumbered by almost 2 to 1 scored a 5-0 kill ratio against the latest Soviet Mig-21MFs flown by Soviet pilots. The Mirage IIIC scored the majority of the kills and that variant was more than 6 years older than the Soviet MFs they were beating.

    Indeed.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Rimon_20

    Rimon 20 (Hebrew: רימון 20‎‎, Pomegranate 20) was the code name of an aerial battle which pitted the Israeli Air Force directly against Soviet fighter pilots stationed in Egypt during the War of Attrition. Israel selectively chose its most skilled fighter pilots to participate in the planned dogfight in order to send a message to the Soviet Union. During the three-minute engagement, which took place on July 30, 1970, the Soviets were dominated by their veteran Israeli counterparts, resulting in the downing of five Soviet-flown MiG-21s by Israeli F-4 Phantoms and Mirage IIIs. Egyptian military leaders were satisfied to hear the outcome of the battle because the Soviets had long been criticizing Egypt’s aerial losses to Israel and attributing them to the lack of skill of its fighter pilots.

    That sounds familiar.

    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    Iraqis have not lost that many a/c in DS, the real fight was concentrated on first few nights only. What I think is that some of western losses declared as SAM/AAA hits or failures might have been A-A kills, especially those between 17-19. January.. (two GR.1s, A-6E…)

    Highly unlikely for the GR.1 since it was flying at very low level, which proved to be a dangerous tactic due to IR SAMs and AAA.

    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    One or three, that does not change much.. Still, wreckage alone means little, it could have been a technical failure.. On-camera kill footage is much better.. Have you got all 82 of them? :eagerness:

    If you ask a man about how many women has he slept with, divide his claim by two and you get close to the real number.. The same way, all pilots claim similar BS.. It has started in WWI and has not changed since..

    Well I refer you to the comments of Ozair Mr. Revisionist. Those aren’t the only two videos and there are different kills on each. Between those, the wreckage and the multiple sources that comment the matter, I think the weight of evidence is firmly on my side in this. However, you are free to believe Comical Ali’s Syrian cousin if you wish.

    So what happens when their video footage is analysed and oops, nothing there? Your conspiracy theories have more holes than a sieve.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2148924
    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    Did you account for sweeped wings and airfoil?
    Basicly the whole T-50 is a wing, much like Flanker. The Flanker suffer for huge Vertical stabz, and ventrals fins. As well as a drag induced outer wing stations. And yet no one can really say the Flanker has a draggy airframe which constrained its range.
    Having large wing area does not mean much drag in it self.
    You have to look at the wing, preffreble in a wing tunnel.

    If its one area Sukhoi is King, its on aerodynamic.
    The fatso stubby F-35, not so.

    High sweep is an advantage in the supersonic and transonic regime but subsonic, less sweep is better. kCl^2 is a negligible term in cruise conditions, it’s Cd0 that dominates and that is multiplied by the reference area, which is far larger in the case of the PAK-FA. Basically the PAK-FA has 23% more fuel but 37% more weight and 84% higher reference area.

    Since when do fat objects necessarily make bad subsonic cruisers. Which do you think uses more fuel relative to its weight subsonic, a Concorde or an A320?

    The F135 also has a much higher pressure ratio, 28:1 vs 23:1. And the crazy thing is that the F-35A is sitting there with a fuel fraction higher fuel fraction than any Russian fighter and a much higher pressure ratio, claiming less range than an Su-35 and people question it just because they don’t like how it looks.

    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    So, one wreckage provides proof for 82 kills? Interesting logic..

    The Arab claims are nonsense, no doubts.. But they are still quite useful, at least we know what BS claims the pilots are generally capable of..

    The wreckage footage was in several different places, just as the on-camera kills were. Now again, where is there evidence of the hilarious 42 Eagle kills that the Syrian government claimed/BSed?:eagerness:

    It’s probably not the pilots claiming it you’ll find.

    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    Does the video contain footage of 82 kills?

    Mentions and shows wreckage at 8:10. ‘Wreckage of nearly 100 Arab jets’. Still waiting to see wreckage of these 42 claimed F-15 kills.:eagerness:

    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    They did score 82-0 in their claims only.. I think it’s time to let these claims undergo the same critical judgement as claims from Syrians or Iraqis, where people are demanding proofs, videos, wreckage pics, loss confirmation from Israeli MoD, birth certificate of the pilot andwhatnot.. How many wreckage pics of Syrian MiGs can we find, BTW?

    Well there’s a video about two posts above yours and many more.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=bekaa+valley+air+war

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2149020
    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    Radius not range. Bear in mind that total fuel is 13,326lb, but not all of that is usable, plus you need a reserve.

    Again your half-information data card says >900nm.

    And please stop spouting your meaningless, unverified numbers. It’s just noise right now.

    in reply to: General Discussion #263688
    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    Cold War with absurdly huge economic ties and interdependence. I can live with that.

    That’s the part that needs to stop. It hasn’t yet because we haven’t admitted it. Russia gets sanctions following an intervention in a previously owned province after a democratically elected government got overthrown, meanwhile China claims the entire South China Sea as their EEZ up to 2,000nm from their coastline and within 50nm of other countries, threatens Taiwan with war if it claims independence and continues to claim parts of India and…. nothing.

    A change in policy is required.

    Starfish Prime
    Participant

    The 1982 Lebanon Air War was fought entirely Beyond Visual Range.

    A quick use of YouTube will show you that it wasn’t.

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 947 total)