dark light

raggi

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 737-900 #735150
    raggi
    Participant

    RE: 737-900

    hi kabir
    Alaskan Airlines are the launch customer for the -900.
    Continental and KLM have also placed orders. SAA have ordered the -800 I think.
    As for the winglets, I am not sure, but I think that if they are not standard equipment they are at least optional.

    in reply to: Is it a 747SP??? #735187
    raggi
    Participant

    RE: Is it a 747SP???

    the Air Force One is a 747-200B variant. It has however been
    retrofitted with brand new GE CF6-80C2 engines ( similiar to those on the 747-400 ).
    By the way, in my opinion that aircraft has one of the most stylish liveries around..does anyone agree?

    in reply to: Favourite & worst looking airliner of all time #735744
    raggi
    Participant

    RE: Favourite & worst looking airliner of all time

    there is simply no contest
    the B777 is simply the most graceful and beatiful aircraft.
    The -300 is in my opinion THE aircraft when it comes to looks.
    Of the -200srs I like those powered by General Electric GE90`s.
    As for the worst looking, the A310 and 767-200 gets my vote, closely followed by the F28.

    in reply to: Aeroplane Crashes #735919
    raggi
    Participant

    RE: Aeroplane Crashes

    SAA has had at least two fatal crashes that I can think of. An
    DC-10 skidded off an icy runway in NY sometime in the 80`s. Not too many years ago an MD80 crashed outside Oslo, or was it Stockholm, after the engines was clogged with ice due to poor
    anti- icing work done by airport personell.
    I`ve heard that Quantas still is the safest airline around. Was anyone killed/ injured in the overshooting incident with a 747-400 in Bangkok?

    in reply to: Continental Airlines B767 #735926
    raggi
    Participant

    RE: Continental Airlines B767

    no V1. You are wrong.
    there is no airplane called B767-400. The aircraft you are thinking of is the -400ER. And it has a shorter range than the earlier extended range models, namely the -200ER and 300ER. Boeing is also now offering the -200ER, -300 and -300ER with the new 777-style interior and flightdeck. Both Delta and Continental have just taken delivery of the B767-400ER..the upcoming -400ERX, however will have a range similiar to the
    -300ER. Kenya Airways has ordered this model.
    Any more questions anyone ?

    in reply to: A330 vs B777 #735931
    raggi
    Participant

    RE: A330 vs B777

    the 777-300 is the world`s most stylish airplane. If I`d have to like an A330 it would have to be the -300. Come on, there`s nothing as cool as a looooong airplane. Remember the stretched DC8`s…. the 777-200ER is a bit pricier but offers more range, comfort, bellyhold capacity and seats than do either one of
    the A330 variants

    in reply to: Continental Airlines B767 #735934
    raggi
    Participant

    RE: Continental Airlines B767

    as far as I know, boeing hasn`t launched the 767-400 yet.
    The basic and so far only version available is the -400ER.
    In three- four years the -400ERX will be available, which will
    give -300ER range with -400ER capacity.

    in reply to: Continental Airlines B767 #736077
    raggi
    Participant

    RE: Continental Airlines B767

    what matilainen says about the 767-400 is wrong.
    The two launch airlines for the -400ER are Delta, who has ordered 21, and Continental, who has a firm order for 26.
    United has not (yet) placed an order for the 767-400.

    in reply to: Airbus A318 #736568
    raggi
    Participant

    RE: Airbus A318

    As the smallest member of the A320 family, the A318 will seat between 95-125 people, depending on configuration. It will probably have PW6000 powerplants, and be able to fly about
    2000- 2500 nm. As for dimensions I`m not so sure, but I`d guess
    about 5 metres shorter than the A319

    in reply to: B777- 300 #737868
    raggi
    Participant

    Triple sevens

    Hello Matthew
    I do agree that the A340 is a very nice aircraft, but in my opinion it`s not even in the same league as the 777. Just the size of the engines on the 777 is good enough reason to find it better-looking. Especially GE90- powered ones. I can`t wait to see the -300ER, which will have the even larger version, the 115B. By the way, I don`t know how much your into civil aviation, but do you know of any airlines that operate GE90 powered 777-300s? All the operators I know have PW4000s or RR Trents.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)