^^^^ I hope it does – means I’ve got a much better chance of seeing it then! 😀
Re the 737…they do come through my area enroute to Seattle looking as seen in the photos. The fuselages sections are made in Wichita, Kansas. The current 737 high production rate probably makes air transport uneconomical. I do wonder if they ever suffer any damage or vandalism?
The B737’s are renown for turning up in Seattle with various bullet holes courtesy of the good ol’ boys along the rail route from Wichita.:)
I believe the Germans were into shipping aircraft around via the rail network in Europe. In fact, I think you will find that part of the design brief for the Bf109 was the need to be able to be quickly dismantled and re-assembled for moving by land means. The main landing gear was purposely attached to the fuselage to not only save weight, but to enable it to be easliy moved around with the wings removed.
I can’t see anything T6 there I’m afraid Tony. Part numbers would be helpful.
Beautifully presented! 🙂
^ looks like a Warner Scarab.
What a magnificent machine! Thanks for the photo DCW!
I’m not sure, but I think that’s the ‘Dislike’ button there on top of the control column!
The Blip Switch – I would “Like” to slow down….:eagerness:
Fantastic photos DCW! The fellas at NAW have done a fine job again.
Terrible news. I hope both Giles and Oliver return to good health soon and the Moth is returned to its former glory.
From what I can see, it may be easier to replace the skin on the leading edge. It will also depend on what structural damage has been done. I don’t fancy being the poor ****** who has to clean out the mess. Still, it could’ve been a seagull – think rotten fish smell…. 🙂
There you go tb…:)
Definitely not Mustang. The main wheels on the Mustang were/are 27″ and the tail wheel 12 1/2″. The eBay wheels are 26″ SC (Smooth Contour), which is large for a tail wheel.
Possible candidate could be B-17 tail wheel, or how about Boston nosewheel?
Devcon metal filled epoxy is good stuff too, for filling holes, divots, etc. Can be filed and drilled. Sticks like excrement to a blanket as well. 🙂
I have bought a lot from Malcolm as well and it has been all good. 🙂
It is very possible the liners can be used 😉 and I would not be surprised if the cylinder blocks (or skirts) and some of the conrods are ex-Merlin stock. The Meteor conrods I remember were all shotpeened. Yes, Merlin cams are like rocking horse manure, mainly due to the design, compounded by the irregular use of the engines these days. This is the reason why most operators have some sort of pre-oiling system fitted to their machines. It only takes a couple of seconds whilst oil pressure is building up after start for a “dry” cam to be destroyed. Cams, amongst other things, are being produced as PMA’ed parts by Roush Aviation, for one example.
Anything is possible if you throw enough cash at the problem and you want it bad enough… 🙂
Not many really. Some of the crankshafts were surplus Merlin stock and still had “D” numbers on them. Some of the seals, especially for the transfer of fluids between the head and cylinder skirts are the same. The cylinder liners are liners are longer, pistons higher compression and the crankcase obviously different on the Meteor. Probably a few other things, but I can’t remember off the top of my head right now.