dark light

HAWX ace

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 674 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2432209
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    I don’t give APA much credibility. Their analyses tned to be driven by their biases and vested interests. They have zero access to official data on either the F-35 or F-22 and rely on whatever speculative reports exist in the public domain but don’t hesitate to make sweeping and authoritative conclusions based on such.

    I mostly agree with your view, I partly disagree with the “official data” part, data and statements released by LM is pretty official to me. Other than that, APA has the same access to official data as anybody else.

    However, this is Mr. Kopp’s bio:

    If anybody has more degrees, analytics and working experience then feel free to challenge him, but not reject him just by virtue of his views.

    Saying “Oh, well Kopp is anti-F-35 biased, why bother” and stopping there is not an argument. So he is. So what? Sadly we don’t live in a bias-free internet/world. Besides, he is not alone out there, I’ve read anti-f-35 criticism for years, in many countries and many authors, so is everybody crazy and LM so deeply misunderstood?

    At the end of the day, I hardly expect to read an article, any article and find absolute neutrality in it, every man is entitled to his opinion and if he can support it with arguments and whatever available data he can find, then the least I can do is carefully read his views.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2432313
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Facts: USAF data shows that in 2008 the F-22 costs $44K per flying hour and the F-15 costs $30K per flying hour. But it is important to recognize the F-22 flight hour costs include base standup and other one-time costs associated with deploying a new weapon system. The F-15 is mature and does not have these same non-recurring costs. A more valid comparison is variable cost per flying hour, which for the F-22 in 2008 was $19K while for the F-15 was $17K.

    They ar not mine: http://www.afa.org/edop/2009/edop_7-13-09.asp I think that USAF would love 4000 $/h. Actually between 19000 (if only variable cost are considered) and 44000 $/h. Anyway, it shows that 5th gen. A/C (wheather you aprove the term or not; let’s say the more complex, VLO fighters) cost more to operate. Yes, I know the Russians are more clever that the inept Americans :p, but 1500 $/h, though…

    Pardon me, but somehow I find it hard to believe that the huge twin engined F-15 flies for ONLY $17K per hour while the tiny single engined F-16 flies for $50K.

    …Kucharek said it costs roughly $50,000 per hour/per jet to scramble F-16s. From the time the plane was initially intercepted over Lake Superior near the Michigan upper peninsula until it landed on the Missouri highway, it was followed by two F-16s for more than five hours — a likely tab of $500,000.

    Hint: USAF sources in both cases. So, someone must be lying or… they calculate the cost in different ways taking different things into consideration.

    Yes the cold war is over, but what has that got to do with what I said and why did you conclude I was talking about Russia in the first place? There are other nations on earth that have active airforces apart from Russia and America you know.

    Thank you for not replying thus validating my points and sources.

    ***Removed by moderator. Frank.***

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2432315
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    The Air force seems to think the F-22 works out at around $19K per hour. I would think that they have the more accurate figure over that of a author of the article in question.
    http://www.afa.org/edop/2009/edop_7-13-09.asp

    HAWX ace, the F-22 canopy issue is no longer as it has been rectified, it only happened ONCE. Besides, it’s nice and refreshing that they are so open and honest about their aircraft and choose not to hide any faults and setbacks behind a veil of national security like many nations do.

    I was being ironic, obviously (check the smiley, that’s what they’re for). I am not implying that the F-22 needs a new canopy each time it lands… :rolleyes:

    However, the Raptor has presented more other problems equally singular:

    dailytech.com: Lockheed’s F-22 Raptor Gets Zapped by International Date Line

    or far, far less:

    defensetech.org: That Deaf, Dumb, and Blind Jet…

    As for security reasons, I hardly find that it helped me informationwise in any way to learn that a single F-22 had a mulfunction with its canopy once. SFW?

    As for the other nations you refer to, I believe we had a very good insight recently about the operational status of RuAF’s MiG-29s.

    Kommersant quotes retired General Anatoly Kornukov, as saying “Russia needed to mothball or start costly repairs of its entire fighter jet fleet.”

    Sorry for the reality check, but the Cold War is over.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2432322
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    [IMG*]http://www.kbvp.com/sites/default/files/images/F-22%20Cockpit.preview.j…]

    F-22 Raptor rear-hinged canopy.

    If you look at the PAK FA pictures, it has a framed sliding canopy.

    The frame may obstruct the pilot’s view from above and the hump may obstruct rear visibility, whereas from the Raptor, cockpit visibility is better with a bubble frameless canopy.

    Someone from Sukhoi, Pogosyan himself IIRC, explicitely stated that the frame was for the prototype only and would be removed in production models.

    Anyway, F-22 has MUCH more serious issues with its canopy… šŸ˜€

    http://images.spaceref.com/news/2006/f22.40.jpg

    http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=20396

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2432340
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Age does not determine the abilities of radar.

    It does, but only up to a certain point. In the example given, the APG-77 is currently at its (V)1 version, has interated more functions, and after all, it is operational, it accumulates lots of flying hours daily and constantly evolves. Not many other AESAs out there can boast of that. Not many out there at all.

    At the end of the day, a nineties ferrari is always a ferrari, no?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2432343
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    I wonder if that guy works for APA also?

    He is a “she” actually… :p

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2432410
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Lyudmila for president!!! šŸ˜€

    in reply to: Phantom Upgrades #2432711
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Just for the record, HAF’s PI2000 F-4s typically carry for self defense one AIM-9P and one AIM-9L on each dual underwing rail, not 4 AIM-9L/Ms. I think, but I don’t have a pic right now to prove it, that a similar compination is used with THK’s T2020 F-4s.

    I don’t think there are so many upgrade options and systems for any other fighter around, save for the F-16 and perhaps the MiG-21, nor will ever be again.

    in reply to: Greece vs Israel scenario #2432762
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Not to state the obvious, but surely an Israeli attack on Greece is an attack on NATO?

    http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/989/thanksfortheinfo640.jpg

    No disrespect, but that was the original point of post #102.

    Sens, since i want to prevent a flamewar, although i am too tired to continue on the “Balkan derailing train” in this “israeli derailed train”, i will only give you a hint to explain Hawx’s reaction.

    No, actually I’m too tired too. I’ve been through such discussions over Macedonia (read: the province of Greece) roughly since… internet boards were invented. It’s pretty futile when you “knock on the deaf man’s door”, as you said…

    (especially our comunist party, which lives still in the Lenin era and for example even now in the time of crisis the only thing that can think of is “everyone go on strike! Say no to the capitalist, anti-worker plans”! ).

    Yes, in fact, a couple of months ago, Mrs. Papariga head of CPG openly stated that the Berlin Wall was nothing but a self-expression of the people’s right to protect their… freedom. 😮

    The same with other two clown parties. But I don’t blame them, it’s the price of democracy. Not too much of a consolation of course.

    in reply to: Greece vs Israel scenario #2432781
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    In 280 BC the Gallic invaders under Brennus ravaged the land of the Paionians, who, being further hard pressed by the Dardani, had no alternative but to join the Macedonians. Despite their combined efforts, however, the Paionians and Macedonians were defeated. Paeonia consolidated again but in 217 BC the Macedonian king Philip V of Macedon (220-179 BC), the son of Demetrius II, succeeded in uniting and incorporating into his empire the separate regions of Dassaretia and Paionia. A mere 70 years later (in 146 BC), Roman legions conquered Macedon in turn. Paionia around the Axios formed the second and third districts respectively of the Roman province of Macedonia (Livy xiv. 29). Centuries later under Diocletian, Paionia and Pelagonia formed a province called Macedonia secunda or Macedonia Salutaris, belonging to the Praetorian prefecture of Illyricum. By AD 400, however, the Paionians had lost their identity, and the term Paeonia was rendered a mere geographic identifier.

    Blame the Romans as you like. Skopje/Scupi is Roman too. šŸ˜‰

    http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/1772/areyouthatstupid640.jpg

    http://www.scramble.nl/mk.htm

    http://www.scramble.nl/gr.htm

    At least it does not pose a threat in military aviation.

    Of course it doesn’t. In Fact, even Greece itself has donated them a couple helos, APCs, arms, ammo, training etc.

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2432814
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    no?! there wasnt any contract on that. they dropped out the gripen demo contract. Not the NG contract.
    They first needed a system in the air, and then a long time partner. And Thales had one up for grabs. the other was a long time comparing offers from different vendors, and Selex UK was selected with there superior design and price, that fitted the timeframe and roadmap of gripen better.

    Although you do have the right of your opinion, you do, hopefully, realise that for you to be right, then mr. Anderson* must be wrong.
    Thank you for your attention.

    *Product Manager, Saab Microwaves Systems. You don’t happen to outrank him, do you?

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2432816
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    http://lemamouth.blogspot.com/2009/05/luc-la-main-froide.html
    (journalist Jean-Marc Tanguy)

    And the choice of Thales was the result of a selection
    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a08b69f7e-cc4c-478b-a302-0b367d0b98b7
    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a5321db4e-30b7-4acd-a0fc-86e6b41d5789

    Here a saab pdf where thales technology is qualified as the latest :

    http://www.gripen.com/NR/rdonlyres/FCB6D4D6-8D7E-4824-B674-4B42B761A7F9/0/GripenNewsDemo_080414_final.pdf

    In fact, Thales drop the Gripen as a result of pressure from French Governement* in relation with the Indian competition (yes, the Indian competition, not the bresilian one… why ? I don’t know for sure, maybe because the bresilian deal was considered as good as done ?)

    *This as also been published in the Air&Cosmos magasine, but it’s was ~1 year ago, and I don’t have enought courage to check 50 issues of this magasine to find the good one.

    @+, Arka

    Yes, it’s true, thanks for the input Arka.

    Do you have any sources for that?

    There is one source right above you, in Ponen’s post (Thanx Ponen), albeit not the one I had in mind.

    Other than that, my source is statements by Peter Anderson, Product Manager, Saab Microwaves Systems, during the Demo’s presentation on 23 of April, 2008. I can’t find the statements on the net, so no link, but I’ve read in two different aviation magazines of that month (none in English, sorry).

    He specifically said that Saab had talked to various companies, including US ones, but ended up with Thales because they believed they could achieve the greatest possible technological cooperation with that company. It’s worth citing that during the presentation, not once, not even a single time the word “Rafale” was uttered. Just a politically correct “…with the antenna from the french AESA program”. :diablo:

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2432837
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Well, AFAIK Selex was chosen instead of Thales because the Selex tech was considered superior… And this demonstrates the point I was trying to make.

    No, it was selected because Thales simply dropped out because of Dassault pressure. Thales was the prefered partner all along.

    in reply to: Phantom Upgrades #2432917
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Some line art for an example of how it might look. Not sure how the missiles would look on it.

    another version with a single piece canopy, except for the front fixed part. I have deleted the backwards looking mirror, but I can’t make the DIAS’s antennas fit with the CFTs attached.

    in reply to: Hellenic Navy (News & Views). #2007671
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    I was amazed when i read about it. With the bureaucracy plaguing the ministry, i would never expect that such a proposal would be approved and given the opportunity to proceed to a functional firing unit.

    It must have been a miracle.

    +1 here.

    I was additionally amazed at the fact that not only there was a test launch, but also that it was unannounced, totally a surprise to friends and foes alike and the missile fired at the direction of that common turco-egyptian naval drill nearby.

    I did not expect too many people at the Navy General Staff having the “balls” for that, especially at a time when money for training is scarce and every measure is taken to prevent excercises from being perceived as “provocative” by the other side…

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 674 total)