dark light

HAWX ace

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 674 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401330
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Two interested shots of an F-22 and an F-35B, both naked, for a rough comparison in synthetic parts coatings:

    http://www.ausairpower.net/F-22A-Elmendorf-Rollout.jpg

    http://www.ahrtp.com/EG_Images5/Lockheed%20Martin%20F-35B_rollout-1_opt600x480_air-attack.jpg

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401398
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Kapedani, the pics from F-16.net do not appear, please do take the trouble to save and attach them. An error message is generated, though you most likely do see them, as they are saved in your browser’s cache memory.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401526
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    YF-22 vs F-22 changes were considerable but what we’re talking about here for the T-50 is something very deep. Look at this underside picture of the aircraft:

    http://i45.tinypic.com/nxrvy9.jpg

    The engine nacelles are almost identical to Su-27 and I can bet there’s some very wide frontal angles where the engine face can be seen. To hide those, they’d have to get rid of the rear weapons bay and make it look more like the S-37. If they do that…thats a whole new aircraft. In fact I’m surprised why they didn’t build on top of the S-37 instead of the Flanker.

    Its clearly focused on frontal RCS reduction, but right now given the alignments of the engines and the rest of the fuselage, that will be nowhere near F-22 ranges (or F-35). Side and rear seem to be getting little attention here.

    I’m going to go out on a limb here but this seems like a dressed-up Flanker rushed into prototype stage in order to attract the Indian’s attention. Expect another 10 years of improvements on this.

    Nice pic, thanks for sharing. The first shot I see from beneath, very interesting.

    I could agree with most things you say, for they are far from irrational. The problem is, your way thinking is too “american”, so to speak. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t mean any offence.

    It reminds me of a comment I read at F-16.net, where there was this guy who (typically) argued that that the PAK-FA was nothing but a copy of the F-22, and at the same time he argued that… well, it is not enough like the F-22, so it’s not stealth enough. It’s as if the world of stealth in aeronautics begins and ends with the F-22.

    Hillarious.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401670
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    F-22 = Metal Marble
    F-35 = Golfball
    PAK-FA = ?

    That’s the million dollar question I guess. But then again, it would be better stated as Su-4x RCS = ?

    Cause right now it’s as if you are asking the YF-22’s RCS. Who cares about it?

    In the heart of the question, only speculation can be made, nobody can either claim or reject any figures.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401673
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Sure…if they change the engine positions, the engine intakes, and change about half the alignments on the aircraft…Then it would be too early to tell 😉

    Oh, roughly the same (and more) things the Americans did to the YF-22. You are so right, got to agree with you on that.

    But looking at straight curved engine nacelles with large intakes which don’t leave much room for any s-ducts, some very unaligned angles throughout the fuselage etc. It can be improved as its surfaces are refined in the future…but its very configuration means its not going to be near F-22 levels of stealth.

    O rly? According to whom? It’s a prototype we’re talking about… It’s like saying that the original T-10 is so crappy and not even near to the manuevrability of the F-15. If you had made that statement in the seventies, you would possibly sound right. But today you would sound funny… :rolleyes:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401719
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    It may be all dressed up…but I’m not convinced. Clearly a huge step forward fro the Russian aviation industry, but certainly not near F-22 or F-23 stealth capabilities.

    It’s way too early to tell. :rolleyes:

    Considering it took the USSR about double that time to get Su-27s into front line service since the first flight of the prototype…I really doubt Russia will do it twice as fast 😉 This plane will enter joint development with India…and you can be sure it will be in Indian service before Russian.

    According to Novosti, contract was awarded on Aprin 2002, so first flight was 8 years later. By comparison, contract for the YF-22 was awarded on October 1986 and first flight on September 1990, four years after. But it was introduced in service in 2005, roughly 20 years later, and still it is not regarded as completed or fully to the desired standards.

    Will the Russians do better? Nobody knows, nobody can tell, only speculate. If they do just as well, they would introduce it to service by say 2020-2022, twenty years later, just like the Americans. I think they are capable of at least that.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401727
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    yes he did, that guy is me 😀
    i used a 1/144 F-23 as a basis, i never thought it could actually near the real thing. i am planning one in 1/72

    on topic:
    i think it does look like the YF-23 (from the front anyway) 😀

    Well, it’s a small world, isn’t it. 😀

    2010 21:54
    aditya The F-35 looks more like a baby T-50 than a baby F-22 as some folks found it

    5,500 K range seems too much

    That would depend on the engine, wouldn’t it. 😉

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (XI) – MOVED #2401735
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    I think many of us including myself are guilty of responding to potential flame biting in the IAF thread. Let us make a pledge to ignore all off topic posts by the usual suspects.

    (no offence whatsoever) Off topic situations do not arise because someone posted something off-topic; that’s daily routine. They arise because someone else replies to that.

    Best regards 😮

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2402133
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    The PAK-FA that flew yesterday is still more like a techonological demonstrator: Engines from the flanker, no radar, no electronics for productional fighter, and no EWS.

    I wouldn’t be surprise if a real protype of early productional PAK-FA (with radar, basic electronics & EWS and so on……) comes out at the time of 2013.

    The engines were not from the Flanker, so says NPO Saturn, unless if you have a better source…?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2402140
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Hej, look at that! This guy actually almost made it!!!

    Sukhoi SU-41 “Fistfull

    http://i307.photobucket.com/albums/nn292/Nilssteyaert/what%20if/SU-41/SU-41d.jpg

    Since we are free to speculate for the time being, do you think a 2d IR-hiding nozzle will be incorported in the long run??

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2402322
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Hej guys! Putin says will be in service by 2013! I’m sh*ting you not!

    Russia to start receiving fifth-generation fighters in 2013

    29/01/201016:42 The first batch of Russian fifth-generation fighters will go into service in 2013, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said on Friday.

    http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20100129/157715602.html

    :diablo::diablo::diablo:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2402512
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Thanx for sharing Otaku. Very nice sequence, with no TV stations’ watermarks too. 🙂

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2402557
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    Pardon my ignorance, but, are those ‘All Moving’ tail fins?

    Yes. Watch closely at 0:43-47

    P.S. Can see the “VS” threads working over time now…Especially on f-16.net…And they don’t seem to approve “non American” types over there…Should be interesting if a little sad.

    Yes, I noticed it too. Nobody enjoys competition/loosing his monopoly. Arrogance is at serious surplus over there. I couldn’t imagine what would happen when the PAK-FA would actually become operational… Some people might actually turn to alcohol/drugs :diablo:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2402898
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    How realistic do you think this weapons load is? As far as I can tell from the pics, only 2 pairs adders in tandem would fit, but I don’t know. The drawing is otherwise accurate though.

    http://www.aereo.jor.br/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/pak-fa-t-50-e.jpg

    Which brings me to the second question, obviously these guys had some sort of hints, they didn’t made these drawings by chance, did they. Nor did Sukhoi saw the drawings and tought they’re cool, so let’s make the PAK-FA like them. Obviously it was a well controlled leak…

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2403169
    HAWX ace
    Participant

    What about the tail cone, do you think it will incorporate a mini backwards looking radar? Has enough space for that, it seems…

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 674 total)