dark light

Whiskey Delta

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 2,215 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Runway Numbers #671056
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    As Bhoy stated it’s based on compass or magnetic heading. That means that even though a runway might be facing West to East the number might be 25 (250 degrees) not 27 (270 degrees) due to the variation to the magnetic poles.

    Sometimes runways numbers don’t match up with their magnetic heading but that is usually only found at airports with numerous runways. In some cases with 4 parallel runways they’ll name 1 pair 27 L/R and the other pair 26 L/R even though all 4 runways have the same magnetic heading. In other cases a runway will have been numbered decades ago but due to the shift in the magnetic poles the runway’s magnetic heading will no longer corrispond to the runway number.

    I’m sure there are other examples but it’s a safe assumption that a runway’s magnetic heading will be directly related to it’s number but not always. Our airport had it’s runways renumbered 2 years ago which suprised everyone as they came in to land that morning? 🙂

    in reply to: Great window shots #675108
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    Originally posted by DarrenBe
    Wysiwyg,

    If I recall correctly, condition levers control prop rpm, within a range as dictated by the prop governer…

    Condition levers control fuel, Propellor levers control prop pitch. Usually there are 3 settings with the condition lever; Off, low idle and high idle. Off obviously shuts off the fuel. Low idle is used turn 99% of aircraft operations. High Idle is used for engine starts and some ground operations that require a faster turbine speed. But it would be no different than running the throttles up a bit as it only adjusts the minimum idle speed so it is rarely used. Moving them to High Idle in flight would have minimal, if no effect on airspeed with the throttles to idle.

    The propellor levers control pitch of the props. Full forward gives you min. pitch while bringing the levers back increases the pitch until they go into full feather. In flight pushing the props forward greatly increases your drag and allows for some very steep decents.

    Some new aircraft models do away with the condition levers and use other means to which introduce fuel and shut it off. Another feature is the elimination of the propellor levers and incorporate them into the throttle and have them automatically adjust according to their position. I believe that the Do328 also has this type of system.

    That’s about all I can remember of the turboprops. 🙂

    in reply to: The fastest EMB-145 pilot out there #679900
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    The nautical and statute mile are the same length no matter how fast you’re going. 🙂 Now if you’re referring to Indicated Airspeed (or Equivilant Airspeed) than you’re opening up a whole other can of worms. 😉

    in reply to: The fastest EMB-145 pilot out there #680746
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    1.15 is the rough conversion factor to mph. So just add 15% to the GS.

    628 knots

    10% = 62

    half of that (5%) = 31

    add those together = 93

    add that to the GS = 721 mph

    in reply to: The fastest EMB-145 pilot out there #681001
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    Originally posted by Airline owner
    How fast were you going along the ground:cool:

    As it is stated on the website: 628 knots.

    in reply to: The fastest EMB-145 pilot out there #682055
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    37,000 is it so it only be a record that is routinely tied but not broken. 🙂

    in reply to: Christian question by AA pilot alarms flight #686607
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    So, do you like Gladiator movies?

    in reply to: Christian question by AA pilot alarms flight #687067
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    Originally posted by martin_EGTK
    …at the top of the no-no list is inflicting your personal opinions on others.

    Egads, that limits the conversations now doesn’t it.

    Now that CRM has been in place for about 20 years we’re starting to see a backlash from it. It’s initial purpose was to tear down the walls between crew members and open up communications. Now crew members are more than likely to overstep their bounds and are starting to create another set of problems. We joked in our recurrent training that they’ll have to start putting us all through reverse-CRM training. We laughed but the trainers didn’t laugh as hard.

    in reply to: Can Bmused55 do a favor for me please #687068
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    Originally posted by Bmused55
    Do ya’ll realise I’m trying to make a living out if this? LOL I can’t go illustrating willy nilly. Soz folks.

    I can do the odd request, but I can’t take lists.

    Apparently that fell on deaf ear Bmused55. :rolleyes:

    Just curious what program you use for this? I’ve seen a few advertised in some Biz Jet magazines before. How many different aircraft types does it come with? and I assume the data base can be updated.

    in reply to: End in sight for plane-spotters #687261
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    What equipment could they possibily been taking a picture of that isn’t a 3 generation old castoff from some other country? Plus, as long as they were standing on public grounds how can it be a crime? If the government plans on flying their military equipment over me and my buddies as we stand on a nearby road that isn’t my fault, is it?

    in reply to: Amazing Picture #687664
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    Thanks, that worked.

    Ugh, that must have been one heck of a flight.

    in reply to: Amazing Picture #687669
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    All I’m getting when I click the link is an airliners.net banner. Can someone post a new link?

    in reply to: Christian question by AA pilot alarms flight #688407
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    I feel bad for the First Officer that was trapped with that Captain in the cockpit. I would plead an intercom failure and sit in silence. 🙂

    in reply to: Airline video #688460
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    A HUD is an option on the ERJ. We don’t have them and as far as I know no other US carriers do. I believe that only European operators have opted to get them.

    in reply to: Airline video #688631
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    Originally posted by Mark L
    Thanks for the response WD and the links to the videos. The ERJ is a very interesting plane, one that I like flying in FS quite a lot (The closest I’ll ever get 🙁 ) However one thing that I only got a few short looks at was the overhead panel. In FS we only get it portrayed as a very narrow strip, and I was wondering if you could maybe take a few photos of it, as a general overview please?

    Thanks,

    Mark

    Here you go…. not much detail, but this is what I have on my computer right now.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,651 through 1,665 (of 2,215 total)