Originally posted by Interflug62M
I was told by a Cubana IL62M Capt. that the two reasons for pre-touchdown thrust reverser deployment on the 62 was to enable faster “spool up” time in case of a go around situation
This could very well be. I know the Cessna CitationJet (525/CJ1/CJ2) have small centrifugal flow engines that are slow to spool compared to their axial flow counterparts. For this reason they are equiped with exhaust deflectors (I don’t know the actual name) that are used on approach/landing. With the defectors deployed the engines can be kept at a higher RPM. If a go around situation is encountered the defectors are retracted, requiring less time to achieve GA thrust. Here’s a picture. You can see the deflector aft of the engine.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/422922/M/
Looking at the ILM 62 picture, the reversers aren’t fully deployed which leaves acting as the deflectors on the CitationJet do. I just assumed they were in transition to full reverse in the picture which would be a bad thing.
I would recommend United Airlines Flight 173. A DC-8 ran out of fuel in a holding pattern while the crew troubleshot a gear indication problem. It’s an excellent example of CRM gone bad.
Originally posted by Gaurav
For some bizzare reason, my favourite US city is Detroit.
That is bizzarre! 😀
Lexington, Kentucky for it’s rolling hills and nice people.
New York, New York. The city so nice they named it twice. There’s a lot to do and it has really cleaned up in the last 10-15 years.
Originally posted by Gaurav
For some bizzare reason, my favourite US city is Detroit.
That is bizzarre! 😀
Lexington, Kentucky for it’s rolling hills and nice people.
New York, New York. The city so nice they named it twice. There’s a lot to do and it has really cleaned up in the last 10-15 years.
Here’s the roll from the inside. Does a picture exist of this from the ground?
Originally posted by tenthije
All I know is that it is not necessary for both the main and the nose gear to be on the ground for the trust reversers to be deployed. I have seen this on many planes including the A340 (pic), B767, B737 and more.
Most aircraft will allow you to “pop the buckets” and even spool them up when you have weight on the main wheels. I know the earlier models of the EMB145 aircraft won’t let you spool the engines up unless the nose is on the ground.
That Russian aircraft has no weight on any of the wheels. Perhaps it run through the Radio Altimeter? At 100 feet you can deploy the buckets. 🙂 As wysiwyg said, it’s a sure way to have a rapid decent.
It’s looking more and more like the MD-80 series again. Now if they could derate those engines and get ride of all that flashy glass up in the cockpit then they’d be onto something.
It seems to be a conflict of interest for Boeing to produce this aircraft as it’s starting to encroach on the 737 series and doesn’t have the same type rating. I can think of 1 airline that would purchse a larger version of the 717 here in the US and that would be Airtran. They will soon be an all 717 fleet and could benefit from the type rating commonality. Other than that it’ll be a waste of resources.
That aircraft is landing with the thrust reversers deployed. Isn’t that called an emergency on other aircraft?
For some reason I believe this is the aircraft that Tex Johnson rolled. I could be wrong though.
I have safety cards from the Continental DC-9, MD-80, 737-200, 737-300, 737-500 and Continental Express B-1900D, ATR-42, EMB-120 and EMB-145 as well as tons of other company trinkets from over the last 5 years. There are also aircraft manuals for COEX B1900D, ATR42/72, EMB-120 and EMB-145 on my shelf. The girlfriend has a Continental 737NG manual and Northwest A320 manual too. I also have some posters for the 100th ERJ delivery as well as the poster they used when they were the launch customer.
It was all aquired through legit means. 🙂 A lot of it was being thrown out as the different fleet types were being retired and the other stuff is from knowing the right people.
Because of the placement of the Concorde and Boeing Stratoliner I couldn’t get a clear shot of the 707. It was pretty neat to see all 3 aircraft waiting on the ramp for their final move into the new Air & Space Museum building.
One of the AF Concordes has been donated to the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum in Washington DC. It’s been delivered and is sitting on the ramp waiting to be moved inside.
Congradulations!
I just got off the phone with a friend of mine based in Dulles and all flights were cancelled after 1:00 PM. The winds/rain aren’t too bad yet but I guess the big stuff is suppose to hit by 4:00 PM.
Wow, is that airplane short.