July 14th
The airline will take scheduled delivery of four 737-800 aircraft in the fourth quarter of 2003 and 12 737-800 aircraft in 2004, marking the completion of Continental’s fleet replacement program, under which the airline has taken delivery of 288 new Boeing aircraft. In addition, Continental is in discussions with The Boeing Company regarding the terms of delivery of the 11 remaining 757-300 aircraft that Continental has on order. Offsetting the deliveries in 2003 and 2004, Continental expects to retire 19 MD-80 and 737- 300 aircraft — four during the fourth quarter of 2003 and 15 in 2004. The remaining MD-80 aircraft in Continental’s fleet are expected to be retired from service in January 2005. The net result will be further reductions in Continental’s fleet.
And the airline is also trying to defer all 11 of the bigger 757-300s it has on order, the newspaper said.
Continental’s plans would drive down production of the 757 to well below one a month, making it difficult for Boeing to continue producing this aircraft profitably, analysts said.
Boeing has just seven 757 orders in place beyond the 11 placed by Continental and has not booked a new order for the model since December 2001
I couldn’t find the specific reference to cancelling the 757 line only the implication discussed in the second article. So it looks like it’s in the hands of CAL whether or not the 757’s will continue to be built.
Originally posted by Hand87_5
I didn’t find anything about this information , maybe just a rumor ?
The only announcement I’d seen along the lines of a 757 discontinuation was a week or so ago. Soon after Continental Airlines announced postponing future aicraft deliveries from Boeing (just 737’s I believe) Boeing said that if CAL postpones the 757 deliveries that they’ll shutdown the line. CAL hasn’t made any announcement to cancel or postpone the remaining 757’s yet.
Disclaimer: This is a loose account of the story. I’m sure some quick research could turn up the real details.
Originally posted by MSE
as i said, or wanted to, show the full thing, have a go and then focus on stopping it happening
That’s the method that I used when approached stalls with students. I just balk at the use of the term Preventative Training since it’s misleading.
still you mentioned an out of balance aircraft – i thought that it should never be out of balance?!
I never mentioned being out of CG but only having CG issues preventing a quick recovery. Hugging the rear of the CG envelope reduces your rudder effectiveness and therefor slows your spin recovery. Being far forward in the CG envelope and your ability to pull out of your resulting dive can be hampered. CG I think is the biggest variable in aircraft performance and it’s also least considered.
Originally posted by Moggy C
… and the marginal engine-out performance of most GA light twins.
That’s putting it politely. I remember being told in my multi-engine training that all the remaining engine will do for you in an emergency is fly to you the scene of the crash.
I don’t think there are too manyaircraft that fall into that catagory thankfully and those that do are used mainly for training as they have docile SE handling. Even though, Light-Twins are my least favorite method of transportation. Give me at least a turbine powered twin and then you have enough power and reliability.
As for the statistics, there are 2 questions one can have with a multi-engine aircraft.
1. The chances of a 1 engine failure? That doesn’t change with additional engines as each engine has the same chance of failing.
2. The chances of a 2 engine failure? When combining 2 engine stats you multiply the failure percentage. So if one engine fails 50% of the time, the chances that both with fail at the same time is 25%.
I think this is what everyone is saying here, I just wanted to spell it out.
Thanks.:)
I’m just curious if “droops” is the common term in Australia or the UK for what we call “slats” in the US.
Originally posted by MSE
So why practice or focus on the spin its self, why not focus of not ‘loosing’ our attention, recovery actions almost before you have started to spin and stopping the spin in its tracks?
I think learning not to lose once focus or attention of the situation is an important part of training because it is what gets people into trouble most of the time. I also think that an important part of stall/spin training is learning to recover from the earliest indications of a spin not just a developed one. I think that is something that a lot of pilots miss out on. They learn all about recovering from a full spin that they lose the opportunity to learn to recover from a more real world situation, the incipid (sp?) spin.
With that being said, as much as I think it’s important to learn to recover from the early spin entry it’s also important to learn to recover from the full thing. Perhaps CG issues prevented you from recovering as early as you like and you find yourself in that full spin. Remember you can stall at any altitude/attitude and indicated airspeed so that would also hold true for spins since the first step of a spin is a stall right? This doesn’t mean that a student should be comfortable taking an airplane both in and out of a spin. If nothing else, the process should be demonstrated, allowing for them to use the memorized recovery procedures at lleast once to see what it really takes.
I’ve covered my thoughts on Preventative learning before. You can’t prevent the unexpected no matter how hard you try. Why do you practice stalls when you never plan on stalling? Why do you practice engine out procedures when you never plan on losing an engine? Why do you practice instrument flying when you never plan on flying in clouds or low visibility? The reason is that aviation is known for being full of unexpected changes and events. Look how many people kill themselves every year due to unexpectly flying into IFR conditions. If they had spent more time under the hood they wouldn’t have gotten disoriented and flown into the ground.
Roger, it looks like the pilot in your picture is taking full advantage of the GA Air Conditioner. 😀
I also want to add that the C152 is a very difficult aircraft to fly in formation due to the light wing loading. Being down low as the summer thermals kick up really played havoc on the flights. I would like to do more formation flying as I found it to be challanging and fun but next time I would like to have a more stable platform to play with.
Anyone have any other pictures or experiences they’d like to share?
Here’s the last of them. I did the formation flight for 1 other event after that and had a blast doing it. The current administration at the field doen’t allow it anymore for what ever reason which is too bad as it was a nice way to showcase the flight school. Oh well, I had my go of it and loved the experience.
Then we practiced a few passes in a different formation. It’s hard to tell but the aircraft numbers (not the N-number) are being flown in order: 11, 12, 13, 14 and we’re in 15. We had the best of the lot in my opinion. 🙂
In this one you can see our airport to the right as we line up to fly down the runway centerline.
These few pictures are of a V- formation so there are 2 other aircraft with us that I didn’t fit into the frame.
Obviously we weren’t in formation for this one.
Originally posted by VLM Flyer
Good photo, but I hate those winglets.
Awe, I love those, big and sweeping. Beautiful.