dark light

Whiskey Delta

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 2,215 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BA 777 Emergency Landing Short of Runway at LHR #562610
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    I don’t know the answer to your question but being that the 777 has a RAT it’s, once again, very odd that this aircraft would have lost so much controlability.

    in reply to: BA 777 Emergency Landing Short of Runway at LHR #562621
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    Wow, thank goodness they made the field. This really is a bizarre occurance for sure. Lost power to both engines AND avionics? Very, very odd. The statements from the passengers that they didn’t know anything was amiss until they landed quite hard is also odd. Even the most nieve passenger would have noticed the engines shutting off, if they had. Perhaps it was truly a power loss and not the engines shutting down.

    Also an electrical failure that only seemed to have struck the cockpit? Very weird. Again, even a passenger with limited flight experience would have noticed lights turning off and the passenger vents stop blowing if the electrical problems had struck the cabin (not to mention the emergency lights would have turned on in such a situation).

    There are so many different systems on an airplane I can’t imagine the calculated odds would be for an avionics failure and engine failure would be. I don’t recall any such catostrophic failure before even in cases where all engines shutdown.

    Looking at the pictures it doesn’t seem that there was any post crash fire. Surely damage would have happened to the fuel tanks but no fire resulted? I would have expected something like the A340 accident in YYZ.

    I haven’t seen in any reports if the crew had time to notify the airport of their emergency or if they had if there had been enough time to get emergency equipment onsite prior to their arrival.

    in reply to: 4 engines at the rear…. #565717
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    Buddy,
    53131 pounds are equal to 53131 times 454 grams or .454 kilograms, so in the end effectively 24121.5 kg, or 24.12 metric tons.

    I didn’t know you were using Metric Tonnes as the distinguisher as the XR is 26.5 tons. I would be surprised if the airframe couldn’t be pushed that last 1900 pounds to exceed your magic 25t number.

    in reply to: 4 engines at the rear…. #565931
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    Less than 25t MTOW.

    Not true, the EMB-145XR has a MTOW of 53,131 lbs.

    in reply to: SAA 738 knocks over a truck! #567131
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    I’m pretty sure the pilots can’t see their wings in the 738 so marshalers are a must in order to assure clearance with passing obstacles. Obviously we don’t know the whole story. Did he have marshalers? Was that truck illegally parked there and not clear of the taxiway? Did the captain try to navigate his way around the truck(s) without proper ground support? At least no one was hurt and just egos were bruised.

    in reply to: Last flight of DC-8? #568268
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    A good number of them are probably with UPS.

    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    I think every jet airliner has that small right side door as it’s used to service the galley, not board passengers.

    in reply to: SIA Says A380 has 20% better fuel burn than B744 #570856
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    I think the big comparison is Operating Cost, not just fuel savings.

    in reply to: Delta stewardess fired for blogging #572586
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    It really does look that way doesn’t it.

    in reply to: Delta stewardess fired for blogging #572797
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    This happened 3 years ago. From what I remember I think there was a little more to the story but nothing that bad that should justify being fired. I’m sure there are some followup stories on the internet somewhere.

    in reply to: WIGS commercial and practical viability #573057
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    It is very weather dependent.

    In what ways different than a normal airplane?

    in reply to: viewing the flight deck #573585
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    Strictly speaking not allowed inflight OR on the ground…..check out the sad (but kind of inevitable) story of Pablo Mason on pprune http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=301882

    I couldn’t find it in the article but what was he officially found to have violated, company or government laws? In the US the rules apply to only Airline ops but the individual companies forbid inflight access during any ops. Just curious if it was just the company going after the pilot.

    in reply to: TSA #576324
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    The biggest problem is the lack of consistency. You can clear 99 airports one way then the 100th airport TSA will have their own way of doing it or some “rule” you’ve never heard of. During each holiday season they really seem to get really quirky too which is the worst time given the huge amount of passengers they need to screen. Unfortunately it isn’t better for those of us that work for the airlines (well…pilots, everyone else doesn’t have to go through).

    in reply to: My silly question thread #578266
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    On the 737 I think the First Class lav is actually worse than those in coach. The lav is so far forward that the fuselage heavily curved which makes the lav rather cramped.

    in reply to: Help figuring out an airline via it's livery #578497
    Whiskey Delta
    Participant

    I’m surprised that you hadn’t heard of it Bill being in the airline industry !!

    Even I am surprised by what I’ve missed over the years. To be fair L’Avion hasn’t been around that long. 😉

    I heard Boeing is going to make a jet airliner, is that true? 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 2,215 total)