of course. 🙂
It’s pretty standard airline policy that no one ever officially dies on board an airplane, they are only seriously ill. Once they reach the airport the “seriously ill passenger” is removed and pronounced dead then (not on the airplane). As you noticed, the official press releases are worded just that way which comes across as a bit odd.
They can continue to add A300’s, MD-11’s, DC-10’s (which NWA just retired their last) or maybe even an old 747 but those supplies will try up while the new 747 freighter comes online. Even if it’s a few years off all companies want is a definitive delivery date for new aircraft. Airbus has proven that they can’t be relied on so waiting a few more years for the new 747F is worth it if it’s delivered on time. How many time lines have UPS or FedEx had to scrap because Airbus keeps pushing the delivery back? After a while it starts to cost the cargo carriers money as they could have been seeking other avenues in the meantime.
With the rapid growth at FedEx and UPS I don’t know if they are willing to wait around for the A380 and why should they.
I think Airbus is being a bit bullheaded and/or in a state of denial by continuing the development of an aircraft that all customers have turned down or canceled orders for. I would think by closing down this avenue they could renew their efforts to get the first A380 online and try to save what they can from the continuing delays.
I think that the truth is, many pilots (not all before some of you scream at me) don’t necessarily have an indepth view of the industry. I’ve spoken to a few who couldn’t really talk around fairly basic industry topics, perhaps such as liberalisation (purely as an example). I think some pilots view their role as finished when they leave the cockpit each day, they just turn up, fly the damn thing and go home, leaving others to consider the ramifications of the industry. Essentially they are in an operational role, and with an “ask the pilot” column you’d expect them to be answering operational questions, and even the Air India colourscheme issue is hardly an indepth issue LOL.
There are others however that are very concious of what is going on, and these tend to be the pilots that eventually move into management at later stages in their careers.
I think it’s quite the opposite, at least from my experience, that most pilots are quite aware of the workings of the industry. Publicly the pilots opinion of the industry isn’t as widely sought or appreciated as it’s bound to be bias towards their interests and there for not of consequence to the average Joe. I find that most that ask for a pilots opinion are only doing so out of curiosity of what someone on the inside believes is really happening.
Pilots tend to follow even the most obscure branch of the industry knowing that every little event has a ripple effect that could very well intersect with their own career, company, equipment, pay, retirement, etc.
Was the C-series killed, then brought back only to be killed again?
I hadn’t heard that a 727 landed at Meigs before. Is there any documentation regarding the event?
talking of 737’s (sorry to hijack thread) recently got off a Virgin Blue 737 -800 and it had a fairing covering something on the top of the rear fuselage about 2m in front of the fin. It was in the shape of a horizontal disk, about 1m in circumference, the height of it was about 20cm above the apex of the fuselage – looked like a radar or something would be inside?
Does it look similar to the bump on this Airbus?

It’s a satellite antenna for radio/tv for passenger entertainment.
The aircraft you linked to does in fact seem to have been modified to eliminate the windows. adamdowley is correct, current production 737’s don’t have the windows. Here’s a picture of another Southwest 737 without the windows.
Its delivery has already been delayed 4 years.
Hmm… Interesting. Surely if it’s the same aircraft just taken in different frames and overlayed, the moving traffic below should appear in a similar way?
Relative to the movement of the 747 and satellite the traffic on the road is at a standstill. Each frame of the 747 shows traffic not seen in the previous frame as the aircrafts 200-300 mph speed left them in its dust.
I haven’t heard this rumor yet but I will admit that I pray that it’s true. Both the current liveries are awful even after all this time. Bring back the widget.
Problem? As Bmused55 said, they are under their advertised weight but they still have another 5000 pounds to go to meet their own goal. I wouldn’t really call that much of a problem. A better headline?
Boeing 787 underweight but Boeing officials still aim to eliminate another 5000 lbs.
Runway 29 has PAPI on the right side of the runway.
No ILS on runway 29. They flew the ILS 22L with a circling approach to runway 29. Also EWR has no taxi lights anywhere at the airport. I have no idea why they are an exception to that standard.