Can anyone comment if this is how TCAS works, does it purely rely on the Transponder signals? That strikes me as logical.
You are correct, the TCAS system works by “talking” to the other aircraft that are transmitting. By transmitting altitude, speed and climb rate each TCAS can calculate and notify each pilot of the appropriate avoidance climb or decent rate needed. Both the TCAS systems involved also notify each other what they are telling their respective pilots to do to avoid both telling their pilots to climb or descend. By not having their transponder on the Legacy pilots would be invisible to other TCAS systems in the area leaving the pilots to rely on their eyes only.
My only guess would be that 1 or both of the aircraft didn’t have their TCAS on. I’m sure that will be the first thing that he investigators will look at and should be pretty easy to determine. From the article (this or another I read) they mentioned that it was the 737 that was taking evasive action at the time of the accident. Looking at the angle of bank necessary to only hit the winglet and edge of the elevator the 737 must have been in quite a bank. It’ll be interesting to see if it was the striking of the Legacy that brought the 737 down or possible excessive maneuvering.
Here’s the picture from the article as well as 2 others that I found online.
It appears that they suffered some damage to their elevator.
I’ve only flown into Rickenbacker once and that was close to 7 years ago. They had quite a variety of aircraft there even then. I remember there being a DeHavilland Heron there which surely is rare to see in the US. Thanks for the picture. It’s a shorts 330, you were right the first time. 🙂
I can’t recommend “The High and the Mighty” enough starring John Wayne. It’s a film adaptation of a novel by Ernest Gann. If you haven’t he’s novels are a must read for any aspiring commerical pilot. “Fate is the Hunter” is Gann talking about his experiences as a new airline pilot post WWII when commerical aviation as we know it was getting started. What he writes is outstanding since it’s about pilots written by a pilot.
After the retirement of concord the worlds fastest airliner is wait for it……………………. the VC-10 which is Capable of Mach 0.886
not bad for a 40 year old jet that some people consider obsolete!!
Excluding Boeing’s right?
727 = M 0.95
707 = M 0.94
747-100/200 = M 0.92
777 = M 0.89
or McDonald Douglas?
MD-11 = M 0.945
DC-8-60 = M 0.91
or Ilyushin?
Il-86 = M 0.89
or Tupolev?
Tu-154 = M 0.90
I think attempts at giving outsiders a look into the inner workings of the cockpit environment don’t try to justify their mistake but paint a picture where it shows how cascading system/CRM/decision making errors can be masked by routine activities.
Latest reports say that it’s the First Officer that was pulled from the crash site. I hope he recovers.
Looks like the CRJ may have taken off the wrong runway. The primary runway is 7003′ long while the smaller intersecting runway is 3500′. Having flown in and out of the LEX airport I can say that the approach ends of those 2 runways can be confusing when taxiing towards them.

I hope they find more, what a tragedy.
Interesting that they had an unauthorized non-employee on the jumpseat for the whole flight. Oops.
Land the plane, it’s as simple as that.
Also you would have to give pilots extensive firearms training
That’s what the training is for.
wait a sec I thought their job was to fly the plane not to kill intruding terrorists.
What’s a pilot’s job when a terrorist breaches the cockpit, fly the plane? That’s like stopping a bank robbery by counting the money.
Any talk of arming pilots in the EU?
Call the airport and ATC facility, they would no more than anyone on this forum.
The idea isn’t new
No, but actually arming pilots is (with a few acceptions).
it would seem most pilots don’t want it
I think the reality is quite the opposite. There are quite a lot of hoops that must be jumped through until a pilot is authorized to carry so that can be a reason someone isn’t armed. Just getting the time off for training is something not every pilot can do.
because a shootout in a cockpit is always a bad idea
Or so says Hollywood. Airplanes aren’t made of glass and won’t fall out of the sky at the slightest damage, gun related or not.
because the majority of pilots does not have any kind of regular practice with firearms, unlike the marshalls.
Any armed pilot is trained, they aren’t just given a gun and told to show up at work. I believe now that the training is in the same department as the FAM’s. Also the pilot training goes beyond just firearm training and really deals with protecting the flight deck. Why some are against such measures is beyond me.