Vortilons were developed by Richard S. Shevell at McDonnell Douglas for the DC-9 (I included a picture of the vortilon below). Richard S. Shevell later went on to develop the DC-10. Basically at slow speeds and higher angle of attacks the vortilons shed voritices over the top of the wing to maintain life and controllability. Basically they are a poor mans leading edge device since they require no moving parts and only have a negligable drag at cruise.
Vortilons were also incorporated into the 767-400 wing but I haven’t found a good picture of those.
Great pictures Moondance, I really like that first one.
You’re probably referring to the Vortilons.
Southwest is retiring their 732’s and might already be gone since I haven’t seen one in a year or so. I don’t know what Delta’s plans are though.
Good question about the Stage 4 requirements. If they are required then Delta will be hurting but nothing like Northwest Airlines with their many, many DC-9’s.
They were departing most flights from the parallel runway. Putting us on the runway freed up the taxiways adjacent to the runway we were on for aircraft movement. Not very conventional but it worked for the ground controllers. Still a bit unnerving to sit on a runway that long and not be able to see what’s behind you.
The other morning we arrived at the La Guardia airport to only discover that our aircraft had expired overnight. At midnight the routine 3-day maintenance check was due but the aircraft was now at LGA. Maintenance control caught the error and had to drive 2 mechanics up from EWR to perform the check. Of course this meant they had to drive across Manhattan during the morning rush so it took them almost 3 hours. By the time the check was complete our passengers had already left on later Continental 737 flight. We were left to fly back to Cleveland empty. It feels nice to get up and walk around. 😀
1. I was really hoping to get a picture of the El Al 744 lifting off but even after about 8,000 feet they still didn’t have the nose up. Of course about 1 second after I took this picture they started rotation. 🙂
2. Here’s a picture looking at the JFK ramp. Can you name the airlines and aircraft?
3. Our parking spot wedges us between the terminal and this Delta 757. I’m sure those pilots were jealous. 😉 Of course we had a better view of the ladies on the skybridge on the other side. No I didn’t have my camera out to get pictures of them, sorry.
4. A couple CRJ-700’s parked under the old JFK terminal building. Cool looking structure if you ask me.
Great pictures, that IL-62 sure is in great condition. Suprising that they don’t allow pictures. What’s the point of preserving history if you’re not going to allow others to photograph it?
It seems that aviation has gone full circle. It started with the 100 seat “RJ’s” like the DC-9-10 and 737-100/200 as John stated. Now we have manufacturer’s breaking new ground (?) with the EMB-170/190, CRJ-900 and the recent announcement by Bombardier of a 100 seat aircraft.
As for the differences, I don’t think it matters how many seats they have. Basically John, your asking what’s different between the original jet entries and those that we see now. The technology of those DC-9-10’s were the same as the DC-8’s of the era. The same tech found in the EMB-170/190 can be found in the new Boeings and Airbus’s.
– Fly-by wire
– Glass cockpits
– FMS/GPS navigation
– Numerous automatic/manual safety features (ie automatic thrust increase during an engine failure)
– Less polutants and all around quiter inside and out.
Those are just a few that I could think of off the top of my head.
The Do 228-212 LM variants carry a large assortment of very sophisticated electronics, in order to detect maritime pollution. Systems include SLAR (Side Looking Airborne Radar), Infrared, Laser- and Ultraviolett Sensors, Microwaveradiometers, and a system to take aerial samples while flying. Furthermore, the aircrafts position can be traced on a digitized map. Aircraft’s crew consists of three-man.
I’d agree that the bar seems a bit thin for side looking radar (SLAR), perhaps it’s part of their system that collects aerial samples. Just a thought.
Those streaks on the DutchBird A320 are caused by some sort of fluid streaking and drying. I don’t know where they fly but you see it in the US quite frequenty during the late fall, winter and early spring as a result of using de-icing fluid. A lot of times on cool mornings the de-ice fluid is used to remove the morning frost. The fluid will rundown the sides and not dry until the aircraft is airborne. The fluid will dry in patterns showing the airflow around the fuselage in flight.
I don’t know if it would be deice fluid but it’s from some sort of liquid drying. It could even be from flying a dirty aircraft through a small rain shower and as it dries you’ll see something similar to the above picture.
That’s my guess, I don’t know about the other 2.
Nice pictures. I cleaned up that first one for you.
1. A passenger boarding that must inform you that he’s a pilot and routinely flies a ___(GA)____ aircraft so he knows all about our job.
2. Passengers who assume that if you sit in the right seat that you’re not really a pilot but a seat warmer.
3. Passengers who assume flying ability or skill is based on the size of the aircraft.
4. Passengers who must ask “when are you going to fly something bigger” as if a) we all want to fly something bigger or b) it’s just that easy that one day we’ll decide we want to fly a AA 777 and sign up.
5. Passengers who bitch and moan about a flight delayed for weather especially since the sky outside is clear blue never mind that the destination is being hammered with rain. Or when they inform you that they talked to their cousin at the destination and they said it’s clear skies so we should be going.
6. Everyone assuming that every pilot is making $200,000 a year and work 10 days a month.
…..just my bias view.
…and such a pretty plane too. 😉
Suspended? I’m sure they’ll be back flying after a slap on the wrist and a trip back through the simulator.
PFD/MFD/EICAS/etc. are more of a result of the avionics manufacturer than the aircraft manufacturer. It’s not completely far to hold Boeing or Airbus responsible for their Honeywell set up or BendixKing layout.