dark light

markp451a

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 78 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hawker Hunter in 2010 #2391135
    markp451a
    Participant

    That’s them EGTE thanks, the Exeter outfit (unsure of name) had Hunters based at Mawgan temporarily aswel at the time and remembered the Northern Lights name.
    There was talk of them becoming two seaters by changing the noses over, I was particularly interested as I fancied a single seat Hunter cockpit at the time!

    The Exeter outfit is Hunter Flying Ltd
    Just a couple of pics from Exeter, there was 8 Hunters there last time i was down plus the 2 Dutch ones and team Viper asway, Think it makes Hunter Flying Ltd the biggest jet operator in the Uk

    and yes the two seater/single seater worked it the one in Canada flying (was done a couple of years ago)

    in reply to: Flight sim help #220557
    markp451a
    Participant

    say microsoflt and up £5K south west

    in reply to: Spotted #1169019
    markp451a
    Participant

    Hunter XE601 heading west over Tiverton with a nice blue note at about 3pm

    in reply to: Lightning Assistance Wanted! #1187346
    markp451a
    Participant

    Just got my Lihgnting airframe course notes out 11 pages on the canopy so what do you what to know ????

    in reply to: Spooling down #2448934
    markp451a
    Participant

    For a Avon its about 68 sec

    in reply to: Spooling down #2449392
    markp451a
    Participant

    For a Avon its about 68 sec

    in reply to: Devon Hawker Hunter? #1202697
    markp451a
    Participant
    in reply to: Lightning High Altitude Flights #1228095
    markp451a
    Participant

    One of my friends (ex Lightning pilot lol), he told me that they use to do U2 intercept when they were out in Cyprus and he’ed bottle out at 79,000 feet !!!!

    in reply to: Lightning Diamond Nine #1162259
    markp451a
    Participant

    yes i see what you mean. All i can suggest is that 693 had no Radar fitted, or weapons pack and never had missiles fitted so was probably a bit light at the nose! Or perhaps Warton inflated the oleo a bit more, hope this helps

    693 had no rader fitted but had test kit fitted in its place (for the tonka work she did at Warton) same with the weapons pack full of test kit, a couple of day after she arrived at Exeter (24th Dec 92 very nice xmas present) BAe came down and removed it all, so lead weights where fitted in the bullet and a proper weapon pack ( for memory redtop)

    in reply to: Gannet XL500 flies #1185426
    markp451a
    Participant

    Back to flying condition?:eek: I love it!:D Everyone seems to think it’s ugly, but I like it! Shame the last flying one is still stuck on the other side of the pond? Anyone have an update on that? Mark, do you have any cockpit pictures of this one? How’s it general condition? Do you have spare engines and other parts?

    Sorry no cockpit pictures 🙁

    general condition is very good and got all the spares (engines etc etc etc :)) needed coming over the next couple of weeks.

    in reply to: Canberra seat removal #1186105
    markp451a
    Participant

    David,

    There is a single latch at the top of the seat with a spring-loaded plunger. The plunger engages into a channel around the top of the seat gun to stop the seat from sliding up the rail until the gun fires.

    To remove the seat the plunger must be withdrawn against the spring pressure.

    First two pictures show the top latch from both sides. The third picture shows the special top latch tool in place. It has two pins on it – one that it pivots on and the other than engages in a hole in the plunger. When the tool is pivoted (to the right in the picture) the plunger is withdrawn. You don’t really need the proper tool though, you can do it with a couple of screwdrivers.

    Incidentally, these photos are of a Hunter seat but the Canberra is exactly the same arrangement.

    Hope that helps.

    one thing MarkG forgot same arrangement for a single seat Hunter !! 2 seater are differant seats

    in reply to: EE Lightning & The CAA)old thread 2008) #1193911
    markp451a
    Participant

    The complexity of reheat?
    The excrutiating tyre wear?
    The poisonous Avpin?
    The ludicrous landing speed?
    The high fuel consumption?
    The fuel leaks?
    The hydraulics that require lots of TLC.
    Probably loads more I couldn’t think of in such a short time.
    In short, it requires an awful lot of maintenance which would make it a poor risk in the eyes of the CAA.
    It is one hell of a kite though.

    All most right it was becasue the Lightning has no back up system to the hydraulics for the controls

    in reply to: EE Lightning Parts Competition #1224473
    markp451a
    Participant

    Spot on radarsdesk, yes the Lightning was an hydraulic unit.

    Here is another relatively easy one for you all……

    http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/7933/ccxr5.jpg

    John.

    Easy one Gun camera just under the radar bullet (in the intake)

    markp451a
    Participant

    For me

    Hunter (T-bird)
    Howard 500

    just two LOL

    in reply to: Hunter Fuselage in Pool, Cornwall #1323598
    markp451a
    Participant

    Its not there anymore
    passed it on the A30 at Bodmin just before Xmas

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 78 total)