Loyal Wingman coming along…(and armed)
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/payload-tests-for-xq-58a-set-for-early-2020-460947/
And here’s info on the missile.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/raytheon-unveils-peregrine-new-medium-range-air-t-460891/
F-35 and U-2 working together for early missile launch detection.
QWIP has nothing to do with field of view for a IR sensor. It is simply a method of generating a brightness scale for a pixel. A pixel in the sensor has a certain number of receptive electrons embedded within energy wells – the more photons that interact with it, the larger fraction of electrons are energized out of the energy wells and into the conduction band, the larger your current pulse, the higher brightness value for the pixel. Simple concept.
[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”QWIP_conduction_band_profile.png”,”data-attachmentid”:3873344}[/ATTACH]
As for the field of view that the Su-57 has in the infrared band, we don’t know. But it most certainly does have some capability for imaging in infrared besides the IRST. The DIRCMs are, after all, a type of dazzler. So, their aim has to be very precise – they have to highlight the seeker, not just any point on the missile. And, just like with a laser sight on a rifle where you know your aim is good because you see the dot reflection from the laser, the Su-57’s protective systems has to see the highlighting provided by the laser beam. And you cannot see the reflection from an infrared beam with a UV sensor.
Now how much capability it has is just guestimates at this time.
Interview with UEC Chief on PD-14 , Military and other Engine programs
You make some of the best finds on Russian industry, Austin.
“
There are plans to increase the power of the PD-14 engine by increasing the fan bypass ratio and developing a PD-16 engine with higher characteristics on its basis.”
Yup, seems like the geared version (PD-18R) is postponed for the foreseeable future. They’ll take an easier approach to try to squeeze some more juice out of their design. To me, the PD-16 seems more definite than the PD-9/10, of which I’m skeptical of.
And with all of that helicopter engine development, Ukraine’s MIC is screwed. The competition will kill them.
Another Russian drone under development. I had known about Altair and Orion-E, but I’m not sure if anyone has heard of Sirus before. (The article stupidly claims it is powered by a turbojet when it is clearly a turboprop)
Looks like the Su-57 is off to Syria again…
A few days old…Typhoon is out of Canada’s FFCP.
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2019-08-31/typhoon-pulled-canada-competition
Xijingping: off to bomb Hong Kong!
Every self-styled superpower has to beat up on a Grenada every once in a while to remind people who’s the boss.
From https://www.aex.ru/docs/3/2019/8/26/2950/
First shown at the Beijing Civil Aviation Exhibition in 2011 as a large-scale copy, the CJ-1000A engine, according to local experts, “failed.”
This is the first time I’ve heard this allegation. Have you come across anything else which corroborates it? I know the CJ-1000AX that they ran in May of last year was a de-rated variant. But that de-rating was a program decision (and conservative). The Chinese want to run it for a while at 90% of thrust before they take a second prototype up to full thrust. That’s not a failure of the design.
[USER=”3598″]Austin[/USER] – The wingtip contains the radar warning receiver and the laser detection system. I doubt it is much of a structural element at all. Just a bunch of electronics beneath the shell.
[USER=”3598″]Austin[/USER] – I don’t know if Aviadvigatel has given up on the idea of the geared turbofan. It just seems that they are prioritizing Ceramic Matrix Composites. In the end it may prove to be a useful endeavor. Rolls Royce is taking a shot at it. They are finishing a variant of their new Advance3 engine core that they intend to market in the mid 2020s which will use a planetary geared fan, and which they are branding as UltraFan.
I’ll take a look at the site later.
So a high bypass turbofan engine will turn out to be less expensive to maintain than a GTF one ?
Probably would be the same for LEAP versus GTF
The gear assembly in P&W’s 1400G series was intended to be good for the expected lifetime of the engine – needing only routine inspections (fairly low cost outweighed by fuel savings). It hasn’t worked out that way. So, yes, airlines will probably get better operating costs operating the LEAP series. And you see that – they primarily buy LEAP powered models.
The Russians seem to be expecting CMCs to yield efficiency benefits before a fan gear assembly too. Out of the evolved versions of PD-14, PD-35 and PD-12V are moving ahead (PD-35 for sure will use CMCs and I don’t know about PD-12V). You don’t ever hear of any progress being done on PD-18R.
A glimpse into the future of MiG (as a subcontractor)
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/why-rsk-mig-sees-a-future-in-regional-turboprops-458471/
Boeing gets another contract for A-10 replacement wings.
With the apparent demise of the An-136D program due to the Saudis’ withdrawal, all of Antonov’s hopes are on the An-178. And it’s gotten another (small) order.
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2019-08-20/178-lands-first-export-order